lordmandeep said: remember this is the US, you have to go quite far to be accused of excessive self defense. Remember the case of the guy shooting and killing 3 guys who he say robbing his neighbours house and was seen as a hero. It was quite a sad and controversial affair, as most Canadians saw the whole court case as pointless. The problem is elites in Canada want people to have no individual right to defend themselves and to rely and have full faith and confidence in the authorities. No one is asking for the Castle doctrine, but the rules need to be changed and they are.
Another famous case was a drug store owner who shot a thief and was vilifed as a murderer and a jury said he was no guilty. However in Alberta guys were trying to blow up a firebomb at a house and the farmer started shooting in the air to scare them away and was charged. |
Sounds like another area to pile on the heap of things US does far better than Canada. In every example you listed, the person defending themselves or their property would have been perfectly safe.
lestatdark said: I ask you this: Do you have any right to take the life of someone else's son or daughter? |
As for the question about the killed kids family... who cares? They should have taught their kid to be good people instead of an asshole. Its their fault, not the kid who DEFENDED HIMSELF AND POTENTIALLY HIS LIFE. So, yes I absolutely have the right to take anyone's life when they are threatening my life.
You have to consider the larger area here. This wasn't a one time issue, this was a continuous attack from a bully and potentially his friends over and over again. The bullied kid even went so far to avoid them by taking different routes home. They sought him out to do harm and eventually it very well could have moved on to his own severe injury or death.