pezus said:
|
since i use TP/RedLynx for example,it also can't be Rockstar level
pezus said:
|
since i use TP/RedLynx for example,it also can't be Rockstar level
pezus said:
To be fair you said bigger than them and Rockstar is most certainly bigger. You also used this as an example why MS are trying. I don't see how an indie buy will count as an effort. Unless it's something like Mojang. |
poeple want more,they give you more,core for heart,casual for cash,they got it,they open it,they acquire it,try to mix it,5:5,not 3:7,not 8:2
pezus said:
MS is more like Kinect- 7: 3 Non-kinect right now. So I guess it must be a non-kinect studio then. |
i know it's 7:3,or you can say 8:2
so thats why i said they want 5:5 for future,unless they change again
pezus said:
It's true and even if it wasn't and it was running at 720p the PC versions resolution would still go far higher than that (if you've got the goods for it, that is ;)) |
How in the hell did this thread get so many replies!?
*looks at OP*
Hmmm, CGI made it - might have something to do with it...
*looks at thread*
Aaaah, ok. The old 'exclusive' debate.
pezus said:
yup yup same here. Northern Europe knows how it's done! |
The price you pay for living in a rich country is that you only see the sun 4 months of the year.
I'd rather be poor thank you very much.
hmm.. my PC probably isnt good enough to handle at X360 or better graphics, but well.. considering it has many many instances of "ohh the enemy spawns right behind you" I'm not that interested anyway - I really hated that shit in Doom 3
Too little too late for my part. Great game though!
pezus said:
I'm pretty sure they always knew GFWL sucked, they just didn't want to lose all of the gamers to Steam and now they've given up. |
I still want to get Gears of War PC......just need a PC to play it on, LOL. They stopped selling hard copies of that game, but now it's available on GFWL.
But GFWL does suck. Games on steam are so cheap after 3-4 months
What is with all the hate? Don't read GamrReview Articles. Contact me to ADD games to the Database
Vote for the March Most Wanted / February Results
pezus said:
No, it wasn't. Sure, a lot of the hardcore were pretty confident that it would come out for the PC eventually but as you so elegantly said before, the hardcore/forum goers do not represent the gaming public. Posted on 17-Sep-2007
Exclusively to 360 all the way? Zeschuk: Can't really comment on that aspect yet, it's too far into the future. Thinking a year in to the future is a big challenge these days. The law we can't control is the length of the console cycle. I hope, I hope, I hope that this cycle is longer than the last one. We kind of just got started last cycle and it kind of ended when our second game came out. Downloadable content could also bridge the gap by giving you new little islands of story between the big game releases.
______ Edit: And his comment is actually pretty funny looking back. They clearly made a deal with MS for 6 months of exclusivity
|
LOL. IT didnt come from Bioware.
Demiurge Studios handled the PC version.
An employer let slip that they were workng on a PC version port 2 months before 360 version came out.
IGN posted the article on it.
People knew it was coming. Or those that read the internet anyways.
Bioware went into retract mode in their comments.
It was so funny seeing BIoware try and dodge every PC question before 360 version came out. LOL.
PC ports dont hurt 360 at all apart from the odd 100 sales. LOL.