Andrespetmonkey said:
Cirio said:
sapphi_snake said:
Cirio said: And once again religion gets shoved into a topic that had nothing to do with religion whatsoever. What if these parents were *gasp* atheists and not "most likely Christian"? I honestly feel embarrassed when I read some peoples' posts on this site; which is precisely the reason I don't post here often. |
There's a 57% chance that they're christians, and a 4% chance that they're atheists.
|
Right... and what does this have to do with religion? They didn't do this to their children because of their religion, so why bring religion into this topic?
|
They most likely DID do it because of their religion, Christianity, which sees homosexuality as disgusting and wrong.
|
Indeed, the Bible and Jesus said to burn off childrens genitals if they caught them fucking other children i just dont remember where tho. Oh yeah, that's right - Christianity is against violence and torture overall, especially against little children. But let's focus on parts I don't like and over exaggerate them as blow them out of propotion. Oh and the parents had to be absolutely christian, because, you know, we're just that fucked up xD. And as we all know, judisam, islam and Hinduism have all absolutely nothing against homosexuality at all.Africa is one of the most gay friendly continents usually and people there aren't very worried the kid might get AIDS, because its so rare in Africa and incest is usually toleratedcin most countries in the world, so it couldn't be that either. The only reason this could have occurred is because of white man' christianity that says hate the sinner, not the sin, and as we all know there's nothing more to person than his sexuality, and since Jesus tought never to forgive a sin no matter how small and insignificant, that all translates to = Christians burn off their childrens genitals if they caught them in ''homosexual'' acts(because,you know, children by age of 7 have their sexuality all figured out).
Perfect logic, there's no arguing about it