1. If Jesus is supposed to be God (trinity), and it the following are God's words or inspired words, Jesus is agaisn't homosexuality.

• Lev. 18:22, "You shall not lie with a male as one lies with a female; it is an abomination."1 
• Lev. 20:13, "If there is a man who lies with a male as those who lie with a woman, both of them have committed a detestable act; they shall surely be put to death. Their bloodguiltness is upon them" 
• 1 Cor. 6:9-10, "Or do you not know that the unrighteous shall not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived; neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor homosexuals, ¹⁰nor thieves, nor the covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor swindlers, shall inherit the kingdom of God." 
• EXODUS 21:20-21 According to God’s law, it was wrong to beat a slave to the point of death. But if the slave survived and got back up within a few days, the beating wasn’t punishable, because the slave was the property of the master. (God endorsed slavery and the beating of slaves.)

 2. Ha. 
Exodus 19:13
13 He shall surely be stoned or shot with arrows; not a hand is to be laid on him. Whether man or animal, he shall not be permitted to live.' Only when the ram's horn sounds a long blast may they go up to the mountain.
Deuteronomy 13:10
10 Stone him to death, because he tried to turn you away from the LORD your God, who brought you out of Egypt, out of the land of slavery.
Deuteronomy 17:5
5 take the man or woman who has done this evil deed to your city gate and stone that person to death.
Deuteronomy 22:21
21 she shall be brought to the door of her father's house and there the men of her town shall stone her to death.

3. Nice apologetics, still doesn't justify a human owning another human and being ALOWED to beat them in the first place. 

4. GENESIS 6 & 7 Unhappy with the wickedness of man, God killed every living thing on the planet except Noah’s family. Men, women, infants and animals drowned in unimaginable terror and agony.

EXODUS 9:5 God killed all of the Egyptian livestock with a plague.

NUMBERS 16:27-33 The men were rebellious, so God caused the earth to open and swallow up the men, wives and children.

NUMBERS 16:35 A fire from God killed 250 men.

NUMBER 16:48 A plague from God killed 14,700

I could go on...

5. Well obviously Noahs ark is a myth xD It's still in a book that's said to be "inspired by God". Ofcourse, I don't believe of lot of the shit in there didn't happen, I'm using it to present to people how disgusting a lot of what is in the bible is.

It's not really arguable, plenty of quotes from the bible I could show you (including new testament). 

Their idealogy partly comes christianity, you can't seriously be saying their aren't parts in the bible that have God endorcing violence and being violent. And no, I don't judge the whole religion based off them, I know most christiants are good hearted, kind people. My mum is catholic, it would be pretty hard to live with her if I really thought that. But thanks for lumping atheists all in the same camp, which is what you accused me of doing with christians. 

I know your post was sarcastic, but it was wrong, it's clear that not only the old testament, but the new testament and mainstream christianity sees homosexuality as wrong. You really think the majority of christians accept homosexuality as ok? I think a big minority do, but not a majority.

I held back from trying to insult you as you did me, but screw it, you came across as a fucking arsehole in the post this is replying too. At least give me the same amount of respect I gave you. 

Regarding your first paragraph, the thing is that protests and riots are generally public things, and you know very well what the beliefs of the group are (as they make it balantly clear).

Regarding your second paragraph:

Moscucci, Ornella. Clitordectomy, Circumcision, and the Politics of Sexual Pleasure in Mid-Victorian Britain. Sexualities in Victorian Britain. Indiana University Press, Bloomington and Indianapolis, 1996.

And a link (go to the sections about masturbation prevention): http://www.circlist.com/considering/masturbate.html

You can also watch the German movie The White Ribbon, directed by Michael Haneke, that shows some ways christians would physically and psychologically abuse children regarding sexuality.

And the ideea that mastubation is sinful is in itself psychological abuse inflicted upon a child/teenager (and I can speak from personal experience regarding this).

Circumcision to prevent masturbation and circumcision as a punishment for masturbation are two very different things, your argument implied that it was a punsihment for masturbation, and (across cultures) the general explaination of reason for circumcision was hygene and reproductive health; and, while you can find "experts" who claim that it was for just about any reason, the hygene explaination makes the most sense.

Beyond that, I don't see how classifying mastubation as sinful is any more abusive than any other corrective belief we inflict upon children; including actions I would expect you to support, like the tolerance police ...

With that said, I still haven't seen a single piece of evidence that suggests religion had anything to do with this case in particular; and the argument connecting this act to christianity could be used to connect homosexuality to paedophilia ...

I don't get you. I provided material that shows circumcision was used both as prevention and punishment for masturbation (e.g. kid would get caught jacking off, kid would be circumcised so he'd stop). You can deny all you want, but the hygene explanation isn't it, especially in christian Europe and North America.

And if you don't see why saying that masturbation is a sin has a traumatic effect on an individual, then I assume you must be some fundementalist or something, case in which I won't even bother.

And if you wanna connect homosexuality to paedophilia, you'd also have to connect heterosexuality to paedophilia, and you'd get nowehere.

Your connection between this incident and christianity is "Some people at some point in time may have perverted the Christian beliefs to justify abuse of children because of Christianity, therefore child-abuse related to sexuality is caused by Christianity" which isn't that different from saying "Some men in the past have had homosexual relationships with boys, therefore homosexuality is the cause of child sexual abuse" ...

As for me being a "fundamentalist" ... I was raised in a non-religious household and became an atheist when I was a teenager, as an adult it became clear that atheism was an illogical belief system (the devout belief in the non-existence of god) and most atheists hold a deep irrational intolerance of people who hold religious values (Christianity and Judaism in particular, and are conveniently cultural relativists when it comes to Islam) and I came to define myself as being agnostic.

I don't get why people think that atheism has to involve a 'devout' belief in the non-existence of a god. Most atheists that I know (including me) think of God in the same way people think of unicorns - not impossible but pretty improbable given the lack of evidence for their existence. I don't know any atheists really who think that it is possible to prove the non-existence of God or that it is completely impossible that a God exists. Also it's quite possible to be both agnostic and atheist =P.

What exactly do you mean by 'this incident'? Are you refering to the case in the OP, or the masturbation thing? In the OP I was just going by probabilities (it was most likely that the abusive parents are christians due to the country's demographics, and since christianity's negative attitude towards sexuality in general, and homosexuality in particular, is well known, it's not hard to deduce why they acted the way they did).

"Some men in the past have had homosexual relationships with boys, therefore homosexuality is the cause of child sexual abuse"

This is quite stupid a stupid statement, first of all because it neglects the fatc that the majority of child abuse victims are girls. As I said, if you're gonna say 'homosexuality is the cause of child abuse', then you also gotta say 'heterosexuality is the cause of child abuse', which leads to the conclusion that 'sexuality is the cause of child abuse'. Such statements are simply absurd, not to mention simplistic. It's obvious why christianity would lead (and does lead) to such abusive behaviour, however saying that (any) sexuality is the cause of child abuse is like saying that hands are the cause of stealing.

And I think it's ridiculous to say that atheism is illogical. As Rath said, for an atheist the ideea of a deity is no different than the ideea of a unicorn. Believing in something you've never seen, neither it or evidence of it's existence, is much more illogical than not believing in it. I also remember that you said you were part of some sort of church group, and worked as a youth minister (and this is not long ago), so when exactly did you become agnostic?