jhlennon1 said:
naznatips said:
Dolla Dolla said: Who to believe? Konami or everyone else?
Hard decision! |
To be fair Dolla... Trusting publishers when they claim a game is exclusive in the past has not exactly yielded the best results... |
I don't think that Konami/Square Enix can be compared to Capcom in terms of exclusives and such. Capcom have a long history of them sort of lies, Konami/S-E not so much. |
FF64 comes to mind, though of course Square bailed before it was released due to cartridges. Otherwise, what major exclusives did Square or Konami plan for a losing console? Unlike Capcom they both just rode the Playstation train for the most part so other than FF64 they weren't in a situation like they are today and Capcom was with RE4. Businesses are businesses and most likely will react similarly to a similar situation.
I don't care what the rumors say, I'll believe there will be a 360 MGS4 until this generation is over for simple business reasons. I expect Konami will look at MGS2 selling 5.6 million on the PS2, then MGS3 4 million on the PS2, and realize a game whose total cost will be over $50 million (with marketing) and that needs to make huge profits to cover general expenses/failed games, requires a bigger user base than 15 or so million.
I don't think it's so much business culture that caused Capcom to port RE4 to the PS2 but the reality that a game that Capcom spent so much time and money on needed to sell more than 1.7 million copies. That's a game that had to have cost well below half of what MGS4 is costing Konami. Despite selling some 3.6 million copies Capcom still wasn't happy which is one of the major reasons it was ported to the Wii as well. So I highly doubt the sales that the PS3 can generate will be enough to satisfy Konami.
Then again for simple business reasons I keep expecting 3rd parties to take the Wii seriously, so maybe there is general lack of business sense in the video game industry which is why so many companies go out of business.