By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Sony - U.K. PS3 sales up 65 percent

kowenicki said:
ethomaz said:

PizzaFaceGamer said:

 ethomaz your logic is dreadfully terrible and abonimable.

nothing you said makes any sense whatsoever.

you just keep repeating the same flawed logic in different ways.

kowenicki and seece broke it down and simplified the UK sales situation beautifully yet you were still unable or unwilling to digest and rationalize the information.

The only thing more embarrassing than your woefully misinformed opinion is the fact that others on here are agreeing with your incoherent mantras.

Think what you want from me... but that does not change the fact that Sony needs to improve PS3 sales in US and UK.


thats a fair point..... but that wasnt the original point was it - you seem to have changed the argument somewhat.

You said it was its weakest market... the stance seems to have now shifted to they need to do better in the UK... I could not disagree with that - its obvious.

But it is also obvious that The UK is not its weakest market.

To summarise in a way that you simply must agree with.... the UK is actually by market penetration (and any other business and accounting measure) the PS3's strongest market, but in comparative terms by market share it isnt, they need to do better.

I didn't change my mind... I said and repeat the PS3 sales in UK are bad, weak... for me it's the weak region for PS3 in Europe... PS3 needs improve there and become strong.



Around the Network
kowenicki said:
ethomaz said:

PizzaFaceGamer said:

 ethomaz your logic is dreadfully terrible and abonimable.

nothing you said makes any sense whatsoever.

you just keep repeating the same flawed logic in different ways.

kowenicki and seece broke it down and simplified the UK sales situation beautifully yet you were still unable or unwilling to digest and rationalize the information.

The only thing more embarrassing than your woefully misinformed opinion is the fact that others on here are agreeing with your incoherent mantras.

Think what you want from me... but that does not change the fact that Sony needs to improve PS3 sales in US and UK.


thats a fair point..... but that wasnt the original point was it - you seem to have changed the argument somewhat.

You said it was its weakest market... the stance seems to have now shifted to they need to do better in the UK... I could not disagree with that - its obvious. 

But it is also obvious that The UK is not its weakest market. 

To summarise in a way that you simply must agree with.... the UK is actually by market penetration (and any other business and accounting measure) the PS3's strongest market, but in comparative terms by market share it isnt, they need to do better.

I rarely comment on threads but this one had me pretty exasperated.

Ethomaz hasn't really changed what he was trying to say - he has only changed how he has gone about saying it.  I find it hard to believe that those commenters who took him to task didn't really have a grasp of the message he was trying to convey.

Kowenicki - earlier in this thread you acknowledged the imperfect medium that text-only communication presents, yet up until the above post you seemed unwilling to take this into account in your assessment of what Ethomaz had to say.

On the other hand I completely agree with your assessment of our 'business analyst' - a market is not defined by the population of a country but by the consumers that are interested in the the products that you (and your competitors) have to offer.  This generation is pretty mature now so it's unrealistic to expect major changes in those markets - thus the UK can be expected to remain by far the biggest market in Europe even though it has a smaller population than France. Therefore the biggest opportunity for Sony is the UK's existing Xbox and Wii customers - Sony has itself identified Wii & Xbox owners as the target for this price cut.

I wonder if it's really asking too much of us all to try to understand what others are trying to say rather than trying to score points over one another.  As has already been said depending on how you interpret strongest/weakest/most important can make either side of this argument seem like the 'right' one.

On the other hand perhaps winding each other up is all that's left in a market with few surprises left up its sleeve!



mjk45 said:

The fact is the UK is Europe's biggest video game market so to be third there is worse than winning in other parts of Europe , It is similar to NA vs the rest of the world yes the rest of the world is important as far as total hardware numbers go but NA is more important as far as game sales go and it's influence.


Somehow that rest of Europe still outsells UK. And that's despite not so small scale of inter-EU exports from UK to other countries.



PROUD MEMBER OF THE PSP RPG FAN CLUB


Hyruken said:
Have to say i do laugh when i read people saying stuff like "Weakest region" when talking about the UK PS3 numbers.

Because it is like saying a country with 5 people who all buy a ps3 = best region! Which is tarded.... That isn't how the real world works.

Some people say France is one of the best regions for PS3. It has a population of 65m. UK has a population of 63m. But yet the UK has sold 4m and in France it has sold 3m. if you look at it in a % terms in the UK 6.3% of the population own a PS3. In France 4.6% own a PS3.
You can do the same for all the other countries.
Japan = 128m population. 6.8m PS3's sold = 5.3% of the population own a ps3.
US = 312m population. 17m PS3's sold = 5.4% of the population own a PS3.
Germany = 82m population. 2.7m PS3's sold. = 3.2% of population own a PS3.
Italy = 62m population. 2.3m PS3's sold = 3.7% of population own a PS3
etc etc etc

In terms of the percentage of population that own a PS3 UK is the highest in the world based on the tracked nations.
Saying it is a "weak region" is pretty laughable when you look at it like that.


yeah cool story bro but great that you, a market analyst doesn't think about the market in itself. you just compare the sold units compared to the population but you don't count how strong the market is for all companies of this industry.

sure it's better for sony to sell 5 million than 2 million consoles but that doesn't change the fact that in the uk there are a lot more gamers and if you sell there 6 million and if you sell 8 million in let's say germany you did fail in gb. sure percentage wise it's the same and you "only" sold 2 million less but the market is much bigger which mean you should sell much more in gb than in germany because germans don't play as much as the brits.

so if they woukld sell 8 million in germany and 6 million in gb that would mean for example that the just sold 500k less than the maximum in germany but they failed to sell like 5 million consoles in the uk market which means that they failed to get a billion of revenue.

 

they make a lot of money in the uk but just half of what they could. in other countries with less sells they couldn't sell much mor so they are "weak" in the uk even if they make more money there. do you think theire shareholders will say:

 

"great job sony you sold so many consoles in uk we are so happy. many more than in germany great work and even with a lower population wow!!"

 

no, they will say:

 

"wtf sony? you sold only 50% more consoles in uk than in germany even with a 300% bigger market for this industry"

 

a real analyst would say it's a big problem and you say it's a good market for sony lol. yes it's a good market but no even close to what it should be.



pezus said:
So to sum this argument up: PS3 fans side with ethomaz and 360 fans with kowenicki.


what if i feel both are right.... becuase they are, as i have said many times its all relative. and this whole thing was much ado about nothing.



Around the Network
McGran said:
kowenicki said:
ethomaz said:

PizzaFaceGamer said:

 ethomaz your logic is dreadfully terrible and abonimable.

nothing you said makes any sense whatsoever.

you just keep repeating the same flawed logic in different ways.

kowenicki and seece broke it down and simplified the UK sales situation beautifully yet you were still unable or unwilling to digest and rationalize the information.

The only thing more embarrassing than your woefully misinformed opinion is the fact that others on here are agreeing with your incoherent mantras.

Think what you want from me... but that does not change the fact that Sony needs to improve PS3 sales in US and UK.


thats a fair point..... but that wasnt the original point was it - you seem to have changed the argument somewhat.

You said it was its weakest market... the stance seems to have now shifted to they need to do better in the UK... I could not disagree with that - its obvious. 

But it is also obvious that The UK is not its weakest market. 

To summarise in a way that you simply must agree with.... the UK is actually by market penetration (and any other business and accounting measure) the PS3's strongest market, but in comparative terms by market share it isnt, they need to do better.

I rarely comment on threads but this one had me pretty exasperated.

Ethomaz hasn't really changed what he was trying to say - he has only changed how he has gone about saying it.  I find it hard to believe that those commenters who took him to task didn't really have a grasp of the message he was trying to convey.

Kowenicki - earlier in this thread you acknowledged the imperfect medium that text-only communication presents, yet up until the above post you seemed unwilling to take this into account in your assessment of what Ethomaz had to say.

On the other hand I completely agree with your assessment of our 'business analyst' - a market is not defined by the population of a country but by the consumers that are interested in the the products that you (and your competitors) have to offer.  This generation is pretty mature now so it's unrealistic to expect major changes in those markets - thus the UK can be expected to remain by far the biggest market in Europe even though it has a smaller population than France. Therefore the biggest opportunity for Sony is the UK's existing Xbox and Wii customers - Sony has itself identified Wii & Xbox owners as the target for this price cut.

I wonder if it's really asking too much of us all to try to understand what others are trying to say rather than trying to score points over one another.  As has already been said depending on how you interpret strongest/weakest/most important can make either side of this argument seem like the 'right' one.

On the other hand perhaps winding each other up is all that's left in a market with few surprises left up its sleeve!



Post of the thread!

If only people like you posted more often....

It didnt sell that much because before price cut it already was selling at 199 in must places. But in next few weeks the price should drop to 160-170 then we will see real increase in sales. Its already at 175 in Amazon.Co.uk

http://www.amazon.co.uk/Sony-Playstation3-160GB-Slim-Console/dp/B005EL3ACK/ref=zg_bs_videogames_26



Darth Tigris said:
Icyedge said:
kowenicki said:
 


I didnt say thats what you do...

But it isnt a meaningless discussion on a site and forum centered on sales.

Facts are hard to dispute so I undertsand they cause consternation, but a healthy debate and good old argument is perfectly fine in my book. 

I dont understand why it has to become personal.

For the record... and I have said this often... I have no issue with sony hardware (its just hardware) and no issue with Sony (thought I think they have really fucked themselves this gen from a business perspective), I have probvably bought more sony hardware in my lifetime than the majorioty here. 

I do have a real problem with people who think Sony (or Nintendo) are some kind of holier than thou corporation that exist solely for the pleasure of their "fans".  It especially bugs me when that is based on some misplaced nonsense about Japanese ethics.  They are businesses and are no different to MS, Apple or anyone else.


Japanese corporation (or german, swiss ect) arent holier then thou but their heads up does behave differently then american corporation. This gen, its even because of their ideals Sony got so much trouble. Dont misread me, they want money, they need money. But they design their products before thinking of money, which is different from the process of most american companies. Product design is just an example out of many. As example, there was a recent news saying Nintendo heads up would cut their salary (not bonus, their salary) because of the drop of Nintendo market value, you dont see that in america. Though, this doesnt justify all fanboy talk out there ; ), american companies are not the devil lol, just different mentality.

Actually you do.   Americans, Japanese, Brazilians, etc are not all nationally programmed replicants (yes, I just watched Blade Runner).

kowen's point is dead on:  this is all about money.  The only reason these businesses exist is to make money.  If they don't, then they can no longer do anything because everything that they do cost (or makes) money.  The sooner people divorce themselves from thinking these companies are something more benevolent the sooner we can all discuss matters in a more balanced (and less emotional) way.

Your right on the fact that companies are not all nationally programmed, my previous post was a generalisation. But the other point is wrong, many business are started and handle not for the sole purpose of doing money. There is heads up with ideals, many actually. I could just use my boss as example, sometime he take costly decision because it helps the local population. Its a very successful business too, its possible to make money as well as respect your ideals. But we see less and less of that in america compare to german or japanese as example. That was my point. Like I said, I dont agree with the holier then thou either, but to say there is no general differences in the way company are handle by country is wrong. Also wrong is saying all heads up only care about money, specifically when we are talking about product design and R&D.

 

P.S.: Microsoft isnt a company I know very well, im not making any kind of judgment about its specific case.



S____M____C____C said:
By the way......

Terms such as 'strongest' and 'weakest' are context-bound. So, it all depends on the context (market share or units sold for example). None of you are factually right.


Correct!  Strong/Weak or whatever can only be judged based on specified criteria.  UK is Sony's best market in Europe in terms of sales volume but is Sony's weakest marketing in Europe in terms of competitive ranking, for example.  Too many people seem to be comparing apples to oranges in this thread by arguing based on their chosen criteria against other's chosen criteria.

As for the sales life, 65% for the price change, time of year and complete lack of any new SW is pretty good.  The baseline sales should settle higher and holiday and demand around big releases will be up as well.

While they have lower volume sales the combined effect over EMEAA should be pretty decent and percentage wise might well be better than 65% in some territories.

I'd imagine Sony will be happy enough with this result.  At the same time I doubt it will make MS feel they have to knee-jerk response and I'm sure they'll wait for a while now to see where the baseline settles and how things look going forward before even considering a price cut themselves.



Try to be reasonable... its easier than you think...

Zlejedi said:
mjk45 said:

The fact is the UK is Europe's biggest video game market so to be third there is worse than winning in other parts of Europe , It is similar to NA vs the rest of the world yes the rest of the world is important as far as total hardware numbers go but NA is more important as far as game sales go and it's influence.


Somehow that rest of Europe still outsells UK. And that's despite not so small scale of inter-EU exports from UK to other countries.

Its not about the fact that the rest of a region  outsells  the UK as a whole it is about the UK being the biggest single market in a very fragmented market  and Sony is no longer dominating the UK market as it once did ,just as the rest of the world beats NA, the fragmentation of those means the NA market is seen as the driver and so is the UK in EU because it is seen as the least fragmented market in Europe and historicaly the centre of EU video gaming.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



Research shows Video games  help make you smarter, so why am I an idiot