Erik Aston said:
oniyide said:
Erik Aston said:
Those are some pretty terrible examples. First of all, we're talking about Nintendo abandoning their customers, and the games I listed were all Nintendo-published. Secondly, calling a 3D flight game or a sports compilation "non-games" is absurd, as is calling Paper Mario a 2D action/platform game, or listing the Sims or Frogger as anything other than 3rd rate, 3rd party schluff that is released for every system. Does 3DS have Madden and Namco Collection too?
Be honest. What is the direction Nintendo is really pushing? Pilotwings, 3D Mario, Ocarina, Kid Icarus, Luigi's Mansion, Star Fox. These games represent the main effort from Nintendo for 3DS' first year. They are sequels or remakes to 3D games which failed to sell SNES, N64 or Gamecube systems. The sequels to Brain Age, NSMB, Animal Crossing, or second tier efforts like Flash Focus, Big Brain Academy or Math Training, were not planned for 3DS' first year. And the first year of 3DS is so far an unmitigated disaster that has required a 1/3rd price drop, giving away 20 free games, and the CEO of the company to take a 50% salary reduction.
|
You said that these kinds of games were not being made, whether they are of "quality" or not is in the eye of the beholder. PilotWings is a flight sim?? Its like an arcady version of the flight games ive played for PC. But whatever, i'll concede to your point.
As for your 2nd paragraph, Ninty is known to play things close to the chest. YOu cannot know for sure that those Brain train etc. games are not coming, for all we know they are shipping them to their online store to compete with the IOS market. But for arguments sake, i'll agree with you. but me personally i dont care. Those games you listed are games i WANT to play. The Big Brain, Flash Math, whatever are things i could give a crap about. If i want to play those i have a smart phone and the games are cheaper. Thats me. If this is the direction Ninty is taking im all for it. If they dont sell as much as the DS?? Oh well, i care about games not stocks
|
The list of games I posted was of Nintendo-published games that sold 1 million copies. Because the games were Nintendo published, that shows that Nintendo viewed those as part of the strategy for the system. The fact that they partnered with Enix to publish Dragon Quest games, and made a bunch of Pokemon brand dungeon crawlers etc., shows that top down RPGs was part of the strategy for the system. The fact that the games sold 1 million copies indicates that customers bought them, and the fact that sequels repeatedly sold 1 million copies indicates that customers liked them. If Nintendo were responding to their customers instead of abandoning them, those would be the types of games they would continue to make for 3DS. You cannot do better than to say that Nintendo might release non-games like Brain Age as downloadable games, some time in the future. You are conceding that Nintendo are not responding to customers, but saying that maybe they aren't abandoning them. Is existing in a nebulous middle ground any better than actual abandonment?
Of course it is totally fine if you like any game to go ahead and play it, and if you like a lot of games on 3DS to play 3DS. You're an individual, and we're talking about harmless entertainment products. Enjoy whatever you enjoy.
But making the comment "But for arguments sake, I'll agree with you" and then proceeding not to make an argument... It made me smile.
I think we're done here, and I will reiterate this: Nintendo are likely to make a 3DS sequel for any DS mega-hit, or any highly profitable DS game, which is why I am also talking about the overall direction of the company and their strategy for the system. It's easy to grab a huge hit like Brain Age and say "of course they will make one for 3DS," but will they make that type of game part of the strategy beyond the flagship titles? 3D Mario and zelda are the flagship 3D action/adventure games, but Pilotwings, Kid Icarus, Luigi's Mansion... These are things that did not appear on Wii or DS.
|