By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Sales - Can GT5 outsell Halo Reach with a good amount of bundling by 2014?

dsage01 said:
yo_john117 said:
dsage01 said:
enrageorange said:

Just a question, because I quickly looked at the GT5 sales after this post and saw your comment that GT5 is outselling halo reach and black ops without the "mass bundling", yet even before the ps3 black ops bundle, black ops was outselling GT5 weekly, And halo reach is currently outselling it weekly and it has no bundles and has never had any bundles other than limited edition collectors bundles when it first came out which GT5 had as well. Just want to know where this info is coming from?

And if I understand your question correctly, than yes if GT5 gets massively bundled it can outsell halo reach.


No dude there are bundles for Halo Reach. Plenty. Go to futureshop, bestbuy, gamestop, EB games I bet you you'll see some. While GT5 has no bundles. And like I said Halo Reach is only 1 year lifespan

Sorry to say but Halo Reach has virtually no bundles sans the limited edition one (which I believe is sold out) which I don't really count as a true bundle cause it costs more then a normal 360...and GT5 had one of those type of launch bundles as well....and as far as official bundles I haven't seen any in America and you know there aren't any in Europe cause its selling like ass over there.

 

Anyways back to your question: Yes GT5 will outsell Halo Reach if it's heavily bundled...if not then I say no.

there is a slim 250gb bundle. Heck I bought Halo Reach with that a slim bundle. And there is a sale going on for Halo Reach. It's like 51.99 ofr quite some time now. And GT5 has never had any sales or bundles other than the one at launch for Japan which didn't really work out as expected

Yeah that slim 250GB bundle was the special limited edition bundle....but my point is neither Halo Reach nor GT5 had very many bundles. They got the vast majority of their sales from normal buying.

Also your wrong about the GT5 one being only in Japan--http://www.amazon.com/PlayStation-160GB-Gran-Turismo-Bundle-3/dp/B004J6L5RS/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1311440124&sr=8-1



Around the Network
BHR-3 said:

unfortunately i dont think this will ever happen regardless of the amount of bundles as a fan of sony's consoles it kinda hurts to say this but i dont think the lack of bundles is the problem with GT5s sales.  i believe in NA is where GT5 has had the least amount of bundling compared to the rest of the world, adding more bundles to parts other than NA would have little affect since i believe most people wanting to purchase it would have long time ago.  adding more bundles in NA would also have little effect b/c as most can see its sales in this region arent impressive, i believe this is mainly b/c of the product, the lack of american cars (compared to other racers coughs forza) is lacking which is a disappointment to gamers in NA and among a few other things which i wont go into here

for it to happen it would need bundling where the HW bundled with GT5 doesnt bump up the price much or even none, which i dont see happening

 

Seece said:
Yeah possibly, does it matter though? It wouldn't exactly signify anything of importance being ahead of Halo would it. Not if it had to be heavily bundled to get there.

if we all had these types of feelings then we wouldnt be dead serious that KA would sell 20M LT and supporting them or having countdown timers of bundled products in are sigs, luckily we dont all have these feelings

So? It's not the same situation, I'm not comparing it to anything else and saying it signifys being more popular than anything, not surprised you don't get that though.



 

dsage01 said:
Seece said:
Yeah possibly, does it matter though? It wouldn't exactly signify anything of importance being ahead of Halo would it. Not if it had to be heavily bundled to get there.


It sold 6.4 million with pretty much no bundles. Isn't that any achivement already? Halo Reach is more bundleld than GT5 as of now so in that case Halo Reach already has a head start.

I didn't say it wasn't an achievement, where have I downplayed GT5 sales? You're the one highlighting GT5 VS Reach, I'm just saying if it gets heavily bundled it doesn't matter if it beats Reach, it won't mean anything.

Look up a few posts, Reach has hardly been bundled at all.



 

Seece said:
dsage01 said:
Seece said:
Yeah possibly, does it matter though? It wouldn't exactly signify anything of importance being ahead of Halo would it. Not if it had to be heavily bundled to get there.


It sold 6.4 million with pretty much no bundles. Isn't that any achivement already? Halo Reach is more bundleld than GT5 as of now so in that case Halo Reach already has a head start.

I didn't say it wasn't an achievement, where have I downplayed GT5 sales? You're the one highlighting GT5 VS Reach, I'm just saying if it gets heavily bundled it doesn't matter if it beats Reach, it won't mean anything.

Look up a few posts, Reach has hardly been bundled at all.

beating halo isnt really a comparison its more of a measuring stick i did this aswell just b/c we say can gt5 beat reach ect. doesnt mean that we are trying to say its better ect.   we do this b/c halo is a game from a past gens that hasnt fallen off like most expected or how most if not all  believe gt has fallen off this gen, we use halo also b/c its sales this gen are close to what gts where past gen

 

it would signify importance b/c during this gen halo and COD type games are the big sale makers many people believed that there was a shift in gaming prior to past gens and games that were popular before will not be this gen gt being one of them

 



                                                             

                                                                      Play Me

If it does, no one would care, Halo 5 would be out on the nextBox.



Around the Network
dsage01 said:

 Now there is like a new Halo every year which means like COD, Halo has a 1 year life span


Halo: CE-2001

Halo 2-2004

Halo 3-2007

Halo 3: ODST-2009

Halo Wars-2009

Halo Reach-2010

Halo: CE Remake-2011

Halo 4-2012

 

Beside the remakes or off shoots there has not been a main line halo every year.



BHR-3 said:
Seece said:
dsage01 said:
Seece said:
Yeah possibly, does it matter though? It wouldn't exactly signify anything of importance being ahead of Halo would it. Not if it had to be heavily bundled to get there.


It sold 6.4 million with pretty much no bundles. Isn't that any achivement already? Halo Reach is more bundleld than GT5 as of now so in that case Halo Reach already has a head start.

I didn't say it wasn't an achievement, where have I downplayed GT5 sales? You're the one highlighting GT5 VS Reach, I'm just saying if it gets heavily bundled it doesn't matter if it beats Reach, it won't mean anything.

Look up a few posts, Reach has hardly been bundled at all.

beating halo isnt really a comparison its more of a measuring stick i did this aswell just b/c we say can gt5 beat reach ect. doesnt mean that we are trying to say its better ect.   we do this b/c halo is a game from a past gens that hasnt fallen off like most expected or how most if not all  believe gt has fallen off this gen, we use halo also b/c its sales this gen are close to what gts where past gen

 

it would signify importance b/c during this gen halo and COD type games are the big sale makers many people believed that there was a shift in gaming prior to past gens and games that were popular before will not be this gen gt being one of them

 

It's not a measuring stick though if it had to be heavily bundled to get there. At the end you can't say 'GT beat Reach so it's a still a bigger franchise'



 

dsage01 said:
Seece said:
Yeah possibly, does it matter though? It wouldn't exactly signify anything of importance being ahead of Halo would it. Not if it had to be heavily bundled to get there.


It sold 6.4 million with pretty much no bundles. Isn't that any achivement already? Halo Reach is more bundleld than GT5 as of now so in that case Halo Reach already has a head start.


GT as a franchise has been bundled far far more than mario kart XD...

You keep posting halo reach is more bundled than gt5, but aren't giving us any proof to that statement. Saying something wrong a million times doesn't magically make it right.

As for some more GT5 bundles. There are already some posted and here are a few in the uk. =) And these UK GT5 bundles aren't limited edition ones with a higher price than normal. Seems like even with bundling GT5 can't outsell halo reach weekly.

http://ps3.uk.net/ps3slim320gbgranturismo5

Heres one for mainland Europe

http://www.gamestop.ie/36128_PlayStation_3_PS3_320GB_GT5_Bundle.aspx



Seece said:
BHR-3 said:
Seece said:
dsage01 said:
Seece said:
Yeah possibly, does it matter though? It wouldn't exactly signify anything of importance being ahead of Halo would it. Not if it had to be heavily bundled to get there.


It sold 6.4 million with pretty much no bundles. Isn't that any achivement already? Halo Reach is more bundleld than GT5 as of now so in that case Halo Reach already has a head start.

I didn't say it wasn't an achievement, where have I downplayed GT5 sales? You're the one highlighting GT5 VS Reach, I'm just saying if it gets heavily bundled it doesn't matter if it beats Reach, it won't mean anything.

Look up a few posts, Reach has hardly been bundled at all.

beating halo isnt really a comparison its more of a measuring stick i did this aswell just b/c we say can gt5 beat reach ect. doesnt mean that we are trying to say its better ect.   we do this b/c halo is a game from a past gens that hasnt fallen off like most expected or how most if not all  believe gt has fallen off this gen, we use halo also b/c its sales this gen are close to what gts where past gen

 

it would signify importance b/c during this gen halo and COD type games are the big sale makers many people believed that there was a shift in gaming prior to past gens and games that were popular before will not be this gen gt being one of them

 

It's not a measuring stick though if it had to be heavily bundled to get there. At the end you can't say 'GT beat Reach so it's a still a bigger franchise'

No GT is still a bigger franchise than Halo. Both of them are huge franchises but look at it this way. Compare the marketing campaign for GT5 and Halo Reach. Then count how many times GT5 has been delayed causing dissapointed fans. Most gamers didn't even know when GT5 was releasing in North America. Now compare the metascore of both of the games. And think back which one had more competition. The only advantage GT had was it being released in holiday season but that too with plenty of competition killing the NA sales. Despite all that I'm amazed GT5 has crossed 5 million. But within 6 weeks they shipped 6.37 million. Do you think if Halo Reach was delyayed a countless amount of times got a 84 meta, almost no launch hype and got released next to Black Ops would sell over 6.5 million by now?



dsage01 said:

No GT is still a bigger franchise than Halo. Both of them are huge franchises but look at it this way. Compare the marketing campaign for GT5 and Halo Reach. Then count how many times GT5 has been delayed causing dissapointed fans. Most gamers didn't even know when GT5 was releasing in North America. Now compare the metascore of both of the games. And think back which one had more competition. The only advantage GT had was it being released in holiday season but that too with plenty of competition killing the NA sales. Despite all that I'm amazed GT5 has crossed 5 million. But within 6 weeks they shipped 6.37 million. Do you think if Halo Reach was delyayed a countless amount of times got a 84 meta  

That just comes off as your chosen interpretation, metascore ect don't have that much of an impact, not to mention this is the first big GT game of the gen and Reach was the second, as was a prequal .... yet it's what, 2 mill ahead? Halo is bigger than GT as of today.