Black_Scurge said:
as in could be in an alternate reality, because they aren't good or considered so |
Sales, critics and gamers disagree with you
Black_Scurge said:
as in could be in an alternate reality, because they aren't good or considered so |
Sales, critics and gamers disagree with you
Michael-5 said:
Also Too Human, Record of Agarest War 1, and Star Ocean: The Last Hope. Everything bolded are the games I consider to be the best of the generation. If you're really into JRPG's, I strongly recommend Lost Odyssey as it's the best JRPG this gen to date (even has the best metascore I believe) |
D'oh another one I forgot. And I freakin loved that game.
Star Ocean isn't exlcusive anymore. Record of Agarest War... could be Western exlcusive or something (not sure), but I don't know if I would add that. I mean you can of course :)
@lewisgerm
I accept your opinion, but please don't say that somebody is wrong in thinking that another RPG might be better than Eternal Sonata. It's good and I'd personally put it above Risen, Divinity 2, Infinite Undiscovery, The Last Remnant and maaaaybe MagnaCarta 2, but that's it.
Mass Effect 3 will be released on March 6, 2012 and I can almost guarantee you may like. That is a little ways off so you should play the first two games if you haven't already. That is the only one that is coming out that I can think of.
Barozi said:
|
Risen
Divinity 2
Lost Odyssey
Blue Dragon
MagnaCarta 2
The Last Remnant
Tales of Vesperia
Infinite Undiscovery
all sold and scored fairly poorly, fable is advertised to hell and MS bribes the reviewers, mass effect is the only good game listed, well lost odyssey is okay but it's really dated
Black_Scurge said:
Risen Divinity 2 Lost Odyssey Blue Dragon MagnaCarta 2 The Last Remnant Tales of Vesperia Infinite Undiscovery all sold and scored fairly poorly, fable is advertised to hell and MS bribes the reviewers, mass effect is the only good game listed, well lost odyssey is okay but it's really dated
|
lol your credibility just died with that.
Lost Odyssey sits on metacritic at 78 with majority of reviews 80 or above, didn't know that was considered poor.
Libara said:
Lost Odyssey sits on metacritic at 78 with majority of reviews 80 or above, didn't know that was considered poor. |
lol you trust metacritic, besides any MS exclusive gets bribed scores and like I said it's dated good 5 years ago doesn't mean good now
Black_Scurge said:
Risen Divinity 2 Lost Odyssey Blue Dragon MagnaCarta 2 The Last Remnant Tales of Vesperia Infinite Undiscovery all sold and scored fairly poorly, fable is advertised to hell and MS bribes the reviewers, mass effect is the only good game listed, well lost odyssey is okay but it's really dated
|
And I'll say it again. None of the games I listed are bad. Lost Oddyssey, Tales of Vesperia and Blue Dragon have great review scores. Most of the others are still good. (Good does NOT start with a 8.0, much earlier).
Don't make such accusations about Microsoft without proof or you won't last long.
Barozi said:
And I'll say it again. None of the games I listed are bad. Lost Oddyssey, Tales of Vesperia and Blue Dragon have great review scores. Most of the others are still good. (Good does NOT start with a 8.0, much earlier). Don't make such accusations about Microsoft without proof or you won't last long. |
Good starts with 8 for big name, hyped and MS games, since reviewers are always "nice" and "generous" with their scores and tales of ves isn't even exclusive and way to cut down your 6 good games to 4, things are going in the right direction
Black_Scurge said:
lol you trust metacritic, besides any MS exclusive gets bribed scores and like I said it's dated good 5 years ago doesn't mean good now |
You can't be serious. So if a game is more than 5 years old it must be "dated" and "bad" huh. Well then I guess that means games like
Final Fantasy 1 - 12
Metal Gear Solid 1, 2, and 3
Ico and Shadow of the Colossus
All the Jak and Daxter games
All the old Ratchet games
Halo 1 and 2
All the old Zelda games
All the old Mario games
and thousands of other quality titles must suck now then right? I see what you're doing and that's trying to flame the 360's lineup and that's fine you have a right to I guess but at least try and use quality posts or facts to back up your claims. Saying stuff like MS bribes all reviewers (which there is litteraly ZERO evidence of) and all older games aren't good now is just rediculous.