his game collection says otherwise

as well as his posts

but like you said he is entitled to his opinion, however ridiculous.

He's a "PS3 fanboy" on Youtube, he's pretty funny, but I think he was just trollin'.

He dissapeared a year ago though, haven't seen any videos from him since.

lol? I'm looking at my game collection right now and it says I have 13 PS3 games, and 3 PSN games

Gamasutra seems to think it is. 

http://www.gamasutra.com/view/news/34544/Source_Layoffs_At_Crytek_Budapest_Kinect_Game_Moves_Foward.php?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed: GamasutraNews (Gamasutra News)&utm_content=Google UK 

Which is awesome. That made me excited for it! 

I believe there is some overlap, but again they are catering to what currently is around only 20% of their market.  You have to imagine that more of the 'core' sits without Kinect, than sits with it.  

Additionally,  many games released for the Kinect to date are definitively for the  'non-core'.    What makes anyone confident that this pattern is going to change without some evidence is beyond me.

I was joking with those comments, sorry, I didn't make it very obvious.

I have to admit, I did think it was a little bit harsh (and rediculous) when he said that the PS3 has no interesting games, even in 2011 / 2012. I mean, I own both consoles but I still have more exclusives for the PS3, mainly because I have no interest in shooters. "uninteresting" was the wrong terminology I think, it's more about preference, like in my case.

I'm new to this website so I don't know all the fanboys yet, but if there are any, I'LL CRUSH 'EM.

No, they're catering to 100% as they continue to make products for both, you're just choosing to ignore the Halos, Forza and Gears. If I were to ignore LBP, Uncharted 3 and KZ3 Sony has a very underwhelming lineup this year.

Four games I would say is far too few.

I will comment on this later

No. They could be the best games ever made or the worse, the nature of the games draw remains the same which is why there are 10 million copies of Kinect Adventures and 30 Million balance boards in peoples homes.

Except the Wii was never a hub for hardcore games this generation, so when Nintendo lets you down -that's it, even if you don't like a single Xbox 360 game this generation, the system is worth it for multiplatform games alone.  The Xbox 360 was born for hardcore games and that's never going to change.

ITS A MOTION CONTROLLER!

Shovelware is implied and ingrained in it's nature, every game should be assumed as such, although there will be exceptions. It was supposed to be like this. Nintendo and Microsoft were never genuinely wanting to create new and interesting ways to control games, that's just PR. Nintendo thought "What gimmick can make the Revolution like the DS was for handhelds". Microsoft thought "How can we copy Nintendo, without copying them and undercut them"

Motion controls are a marketing exercise, they do however have some funny side effects.

Jaffe said so. Somehow making it retail, didn't magically add a Campaign mode. '

Then Kinect games are 'upgraded' XBLA games. So why the concern on value and content for Xbox 360 games but not PS3 games.

I am unsurprised you had to refer to a multiplatform 3rd party game to state that.  Plus you realise this also goes for Sony as well, since CoD has usurped every first party PS3 game, that generally makes their first party "trump" card redundant.

I'd put that difference down to the Halo 3 Elite bundle of 2009, just do the same again with Reach if they were so inclined, it's redundant either way as a bundled sales is no measure of demand.

I agree, hence as big as ever. Although I would say, despite not launching in a holiday, Gears 3 will do better thanks to the incredible Beta.

4 including upcoming the PSP game and Gears of War Exile. I see no reason to segregate platforms if your concern is franchise milking.

It cannot be helped, Uncharted 1 had no multiplayer and Uncharted 2s was tacked on. You can't blame Epic for making a game with a richer feature set and spin it to make another game look better. I'd argue Gears of War has a greater emphasis on the single player game because whereas Uncharteds plots are self-contained, Gears of War has a continuing and unresolved number of plot arcs that carry on and continue into sequels.

This is awful. You're really suggesting that franchises that offer less replayability and value are more deserving of sequels for franchises that do? That is truly a terribly justification.

So to reconfirm, you think that games with more replayability should delay their followups moreso than if they had less replayability.

What makes you think Gears of War will not continue into next generation anyway? Also it is interesting that you think 3 games a generation is too much, but play up franchises on PS3 that are well past their 3rd iteration

I could apply this to any sequel I please and be just as correct as you.

Well, 3 including GoW Collection. 

We are looking at milking franchises/ips. It's global.

Or fifth title.

Or 4 including the PSP and GTHD.

 And forth.

And one on PSP and another already shown on NGP.

As is Halo for Microsoft, it just happens to be the second biggest.

I don't think you could count any of the Sony IP's as game changers, unless you mean it changed Sonys position from first place to last place.

And Microsoft is giving the market what it wants on a fairly regular basis.

Well 2/2 then, both Xbox's have always had good launch titles.

They cut the programmers who didn't want to work on Halo and hired the ones that did to make more Halo. It's either that or the Bungie MMO.

Similary Killzone, Resistance and Socom, Need for Speed also outsells Gran Turismo and Assassins Creed outsells Uncharted. Clearly Sonys first party are worthless.

Because no-one makes platformers anymore.

Nope, but it is covered for blockbusters for 3 of the biggest franchises in gaming and this is classed as abandoning the hardcore. If Gears Forza and Halo are not a hardcore year for Xbox, when is?  Likewise i'd ask if you think 2x 90 scoring games plus a dozen mediocre games is any different from Gears 3, Forza 4 and several dozen mediocre Kinect games.

2/3 confirmed. Given the numerous rumors and 10th anniversary, no Halo Remake would be more surprising.  

 I'm not seeing the distinction. You seem to be forgetting the only reason Sony has a lot of games the first half of 2011, is because of the barely there lineup from March 2010 to late January 2011

So between Halo,Forza,Gears and Kinect we've covered all tastes of everyone who owns a 360.  Gotcha.

I'd mention Fable if not for the not-even-as-good-as-a-spinoff Fable 3. I foresee a new Fable being announced. I'm very wary of it, in any case.

On the bright side, if Codename: Kingdoms ends up being an RPG (As many first-person melee games are) that could be collected as a title into that ever ambiguous web under the denomination "core" games. I seriously hope it is, with one hand on the controller stick.

my mistake, i didnt show up on the first page of ur profile.

but your posts still indicate, that you dont care about it at all.

but i dont care, u can like or dislike whatever