Forums - Gaming Discussion - Rage graphics disoppointing

badgenome said:

Admittedly I don't know shit about graphics from a technical perspective, but that looks fucking good to me. I want it now!

i watched it in HD and it looked pretty good to me as well, Didn't see all those Crysis 2 type bugs either so that's probably why its not seen as a great engine.



Around the Network

After watching this, it looks better than borderlands, just without the cartoonish flare. Definitely looks better than Singularity and such. I think people are getting spoiled with visuals with Killzone, Crysis, Uncharted, GT, Forza, and Gears of War.



PC gaming is better than console gaming. Always.     We are Anonymous, We are Legion    Kick-ass interview   Great Flash Series Here    Anime Ratings     Make and Play Please
Amazing discussion about being wrong
Official VGChartz Folding@Home Team #109453
 
ZaneWane said:

Rage is running at 60 frames per second.

Still yet to see the final product, but it seems like for consoles at least achieving 60fps may not be worth the compromises required in other visual performance departments.



“The fundamental cause of the trouble is that in the modern world the stupid are cocksure while the intelligent are full of doubt.” - Bertrand Russell

"When the power of love overcomes the love of power, the world will know peace."

Jimi Hendrix

 

it's what happens when Carmack wants to keep his team small and still produce AAA games. I mean the game's development team has been around 30-40 people for most of the development and untill recently working on unfinished tools, the fact that they managed a game that looks as good as it does at 60fps and semi open world with such a small team is frankly mind blowing for a multiplatform game. For comparison games like uncharted 2 had teams of 200 on one platform!!! Not to mention the games you are comparing it to are linear games...



@TheVoxelman on twitter

Check out my hype threads: Cyberpunk, and The Witcher 3!

yea it looks pretty crappy...

I'm going to get it though cuz it looks like a blast! nice guns selections.



“Absolutely, we can do much more with it. I don’t know if we are even close to 50 percent of PlayStation 3’s power at this point,” said Asmussen about God of War 3.

ARE YOU KIDDING ME???

Around the Network

the only FPS this year (besides Brink) that interests me. I hope it has a huge overworld, similar to Far Cry 2. That would be sweet. MAD MAX the Video Game



It isn't up to par, that's for sure.



Wagram said:

That's not the only thing that is disappointing. Look at the enemy movement animations. I seen some of them sliding. I don't like the cheesy walk style of the character either.


And the AI also looks stupid. Enemies just walking into shotguns. Damn everything seems dissapointing after Killzone.



Fufinu said:
Wagram said:

That's not the only thing that is disappointing. Look at the enemy movement animations. I seen some of them sliding. I don't like the cheesy walk style of the character either.


And the AI also looks stupid. Enemies just walking into shotguns. Damn everything seems dissapointing after Killzone.

what do you expect them to do with melee weapons?



Doesn't look dissapointing to me.  I see smooth frame rate, no pop-in and what appears to be a rock solid engine.  I'll take that over titles that overreach graphically and have glitches all over the place.

Also, the AI seems fine for the enemies shown.  Not sure I'd expect albino wasteland mutants to emply advanced flanking techniques myself.

I want to see more of the driving sections, though.

Still want, even if just for old times sake.



Try to be reasonable... its easier than you think...