superchunk said:
|
Maybe they should sell it for 39.99 and cut the SP out all together...
superchunk said:
|
Maybe they should sell it for 39.99 and cut the SP out all together...
disolitude said:
Maybe they should sell it for 39.99 and cut the SP out all together... |
I'm personally upset they're sticking with the the bc2 class set up which is hardly a class set up
Barozi said:
Hated by pretty much everyone including myself. Exactly the game I was thinking of when I wrote my post. |
Borderlands?
ssj12 said:
|
half RPG and alone not nearly as good as with friends.
I completed the game alone btw.
Now imagine it as a normal first person shooter without the countless weapons (of course the basic types would stay), always same leveled enemies and no way to level up. Probably the most boring game of all time.
Barozi said:
half RPG and alone not nearly as good as with friends. |
wolfenstein?
disolitude said:
Maybe they should sell it for 39.99 and cut the SP out all together... |
That would be a good idea but EA would never go for it
Time for hype
superchunk said: Who cares? I play BF for multiplayer only. |
THIS!
Pff, who gives a rat ass, as long as the multiplayer is good they could add bots to the multiplayer map and call it single player and it will still sell... oh wait.
dissapointing, I rather have an semi-linear game from BF which Bad Company 2 was. Semi-linear. Were you are going from point a to c but you can reach that location in an variety of ways.
I am dissapointed because why have an linear game with there ability for destruction. You would think the levels would be large and open to an range of destruction to get though it.
oh well, its an first day, i bought BF2 very late and really liked it, hopefully dice dont have there head up there ass and thinks call of duty is good and destroy the series.
Of Course That's Just My Opinion, I Could Be Wrong
It doesn't matter to me,as I love it for the multiplayer. The single player in battlefield has always been average at best,for me.