Chairman-Mao said:
I'm not trying to diss move here, I just hate motion controls in general unless its a sports game. |
Ummm have you seen the trailers...? Move would be amazing for the sword mechanic......
Chairman-Mao said:
I'm not trying to diss move here, I just hate motion controls in general unless its a sports game. |
Ummm have you seen the trailers...? Move would be amazing for the sword mechanic......
antfromtashkent said:
|
Yeah I already admitted my mistake. I thought it was a game like MGS4 I didn't know it was so different.
this game will be asume.
i'm finding it hard to beleive the PS3 version is better then the PC version, but not imposible to beleive.
well ill buy which ever version i needs the points for a slight graphical bump aint gone do me.
fps_d0minat0r said:
if you assume everyone has a high end PC then no, ps3 is not poweful. credit to him for being realistic and not assuming every pc owner can get graphics like: http://img168.imageshack.us/img168/2342/crysis2008012322194198td3.jpg Exclude crysis and how many devs actually beat graphics of games like killzone, uncharted, gran turismo on the average gaming pc? this game will probably get flamed by PC gamers who spent £3000 on their machines but on the bright side, more people will be able to play it than crysis (assuming ps3 is the best version for MGS rising). if its a port, maybe even low end PC's will be able to play it. |
Good point, but if someone wears MS glasses they probably won't see what you are saying.
There was an interesting article concerning what you said written by PC game developers, if I find it I'll post it.
It involved working at the lowest possible PC spec to ensure a larger user base and other stuff.
lets compair past MGS titles that had both PC and playstation versions
aparently the PC version is almost unplayable tho...
@TheVoxelman on twitter
justinian said: Good point, but if someone wears MS glasses they probably won't see what you are saying. There was an interesting article concerning what you said written by PC game developers, if I find it I'll post it. It involved working at the lowest possible PC spec to ensure a larger user base and other stuff. |
saying someone wears a companies glasses is the same as calling them a fanboy... dont
I had a lengthy conversation with a couple of people saying that PC is clearly a different format, and they disagreed saying they had to compared with whatever is out. So in all intense and purposes all games can be seen at the better graphics. The fact that it is being argued against that point in this thread is laughable.
It shows severe inconsistencies by communities.
The only reason why they probably put it on the 360 was to make some extra money in the process. it will sell 4 million on ps3 and maybe 1.5-2.0 million on the 360.
@aussiegecko only if you have a PC that can run a game the way it was meant to be run. Alot of people dont have the things they need to take full advantage of the "superior" PC graphics. If i was to get COD BOs for my PC it would not look better than my PS3, because i only have the minimum requirements. Hell I dont even think my PC can run that game period
oniyide said: @aussiegecko only if you have a PC that can run a game the way it was meant to be run. Alot of people dont have the things they need to take full advantage of the "superior" PC graphics. If i was to get COD BOs for my PC it would not look better than my PS3, because i only have the minimum requirements. Hell I dont even think my PC can run that game period |
eh dun worry there are certain convos that I think I shouldnt have on this site. It has taken me a while to learn haha