By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
AWESOM-O said:
Michael-5 said:
AWESOM-O said:
Michael-5 said:
 

The Top Gear US people have reason to be nervous. Top Gear UK has 350 million viewers worldwide. US only has 60 million, but thats a good start. Also they force the show to mimick Top Gear UK, and they know if they mess up they will get fired like hosts in Top Gear Aussie. When the show starts taking off, they will get better. It will never be the same as Top Gear UK, but hey, maybe one day they will review the SSC Ultimate Aero, a Saleen, Corvette Grand Sports, or just cars that don't make it to the UK.

Now I see why you have 400 cars. If I invest all my cash into a bunch of ricers, I could get 400 cars or so in Forza 3 as well. I tend to save up for the ultra rare/luxerious cars. Last big car I bought was an Aston Martin One-77, and I'm saving up for an Enzo now to do this one race.

Well the car im saving up for in gt5 isnt real hahaha its a PD x2010 but it cost 20,000,000 credits..... but its like the fastest car in the game... it goes like almost 300 mph

and top gear uk if you ever seen the first season it wasnt that good either but they built themselves to where there at today.....

Yea, but that looks sick. It's the car which pushes the limits of theoretical real world limitations on cars. It would be fun to drive.

Top Gear UK Season 1 didn't even have Richard Hammond.. I think they got a lot better after they killed the first Stig. So Season 3 was the first good season.

BTW, Top Gear UK is actually 30 years old, and did not originally have Clarkson as the host. Clarkson and Tiff Needel were side cast in the old show, and I believe Vicky from fifth Gear was there for the last bit. Either way, the show was very different, and very serious. They rehauled the show because Jeremy Clarkson started making jokes about how cars behave, and that really boosted ratings. Tiff Needel wanted to keep the original tone, so he branched off and made Fifth Gear, and thats why Fifth Gear still gives real car advice. As you see it was a good decision, but I think now it's becoming a little to planned out. The show is unscripted, but you can tell they plan specific jokes beforehand.

yea i remember that..... its turned into a great show.... It takes three to do that show.... cause there all funny guys.... i wouldnt replace neither richard hammand, james may (captain slow), or jeremy clarkson in that show.... ive only seen one or two episodes of fifth gear.....

Fifth Gear is okay. It's worth watching when they review a car you like, and Tiff Needel used to be a part of Top Gear. He is also the emergency Stig. Top Gear US is better, and thats something.



What is with all the hate? Don't read GamrReview Articles. Contact me to ADD games to the Database
Vote for the March Most Wanted / February Results

Around the Network
Michael-5 said:
AWESOM-O said:
Michael-5 said:
AWESOM-O said:
Michael-5 said:
 

The Top Gear US people have reason to be nervous. Top Gear UK has 350 million viewers worldwide. US only has 60 million, but thats a good start. Also they force the show to mimick Top Gear UK, and they know if they mess up they will get fired like hosts in Top Gear Aussie. When the show starts taking off, they will get better. It will never be the same as Top Gear UK, but hey, maybe one day they will review the SSC Ultimate Aero, a Saleen, Corvette Grand Sports, or just cars that don't make it to the UK.

Now I see why you have 400 cars. If I invest all my cash into a bunch of ricers, I could get 400 cars or so in Forza 3 as well. I tend to save up for the ultra rare/luxerious cars. Last big car I bought was an Aston Martin One-77, and I'm saving up for an Enzo now to do this one race.

Well the car im saving up for in gt5 isnt real hahaha its a PD x2010 but it cost 20,000,000 credits..... but its like the fastest car in the game... it goes like almost 300 mph

and top gear uk if you ever seen the first season it wasnt that good either but they built themselves to where there at today.....

Yea, but that looks sick. It's the car which pushes the limits of theoretical real world limitations on cars. It would be fun to drive.

Top Gear UK Season 1 didn't even have Richard Hammond.. I think they got a lot better after they killed the first Stig. So Season 3 was the first good season.

BTW, Top Gear UK is actually 30 years old, and did not originally have Clarkson as the host. Clarkson and Tiff Needel were side cast in the old show, and I believe Vicky from fifth Gear was there for the last bit. Either way, the show was very different, and very serious. They rehauled the show because Jeremy Clarkson started making jokes about how cars behave, and that really boosted ratings. Tiff Needel wanted to keep the original tone, so he branched off and made Fifth Gear, and thats why Fifth Gear still gives real car advice. As you see it was a good decision, but I think now it's becoming a little to planned out. The show is unscripted, but you can tell they plan specific jokes beforehand.

yea i remember that..... its turned into a great show.... It takes three to do that show.... cause there all funny guys.... i wouldnt replace neither richard hammand, james may (captain slow), or jeremy clarkson in that show.... ive only seen one or two episodes of fifth gear.....

Fifth Gear is okay. It's worth watching when they review a car you like, and Tiff Needel used to be a part of Top Gear. He is also the emergency Stig. Top Gear US is better, and thats something.

hahaha yea no doubt there.... top gear america can grow, hopefully forza 4 can implement it into there game....



Michael-5 said:
Alby_da_Wolf said:
Michael-5 said:
Alby_da_Wolf said:

If KZ3 received reviews biased against it even before the reviewer actually played the game, like it happened with the worst GT5 reviews, I see a fishy pattern against Sony exclusives...

That's definatly true for some reviews. I noticed on IGN, KZ2 got 9.4/10, and KZ3 got 8.5/10, and the only drawback I saw them list was poor story. Even if the story/end boss was not as fun, a full grade score drop?

However at the same time, people expect more out of games. Halo 3 scored 9.8/10, but Reach only got 9.3/10. Reach is a better game then Halo 3 on every front, but because Halo 3 did what it did in 2007, when competing games were just nowhere nearly as polished, it got a higher score.

This is why you should read multiple reviews, and make your own opinion. Just like voting, don't just read one democratic or republican paper. Read one of each and accept what you feel is important to you.

Yes, I agree. Another faster but almost as reliable method, as it's not only about absolute values, but also personal tastes, is knowing a site or magazine enough to trust them. In the past I trusted PCZone, they were very strict, but in an equal way and their tastes were very compatible with mine. If they gave any score above 80, the game had to be very good, any above 90 meant excellent. I liked Charlie Brooker desecrating style and I knew that he liked RPGs generally, but not those with too many classic fantasy and D&D clichéd elements like trolls, goblins, wizards, etc, so, despite liking those elements a lot more than him, I could "weight" his review and get useful infos even when he was ranting. Now I don't trust any source as much as PCZone in its golden years, so I follow your method.

Alas, gamers less assiduous than us and more recently "converted", tend, at least initially, to trust any of the most known reviewer they stumble upon first, so a bad and biased review by one of them may do some damage. Luckily, the most casual ones often don't even know any reviewer and ask friends and relatives that play more than them, so the damage can be limited if the negatively biased sites aren't in a too large number. But undoubtedly they can do damages that only positive word of mouth and other reviews exposing and debunking them can at least partially remedy.

IGN used to be a lot more reliable. Up until 2007, I think they were fine. I liked how Metroid Prime 1 & 3 scored above Halo 1 & 3, but MP2 (one of the worst) scored below Halo 2. Everything fit and was consistant. However now there is so much bias and competition between PS3/360 owners, the reviews just bounce around. It depends on the reviewer.

I just take a bunch of sites, which I know give consistant ratings. Gametrailers is usually spot on with their review IMO, and for different games different websites are accurate. e.g. Nintendo Power is good for Nintendo games, RPG Fan is good for RPG's, etc.

Also some of the more extreme websites (the ones that give 100's too easily and then 80's, but never a 90) like Joystick, Gamestop, GamePro, 1UP, Worth Playing, etc, are just fun to read.

I think word of mouth is the worst way to judge a game. I have friends who tell me "Uncharted 2 is one of the best games I've ever played" and others who tell me "Uncharted 2 is Tomb Raider with a dude, multiplayer, and more cinematics, nothing special." People tend to be very biased, and they always want you to get what they think is best. I never listen to word of mouth, except when people tell me "Killzone 2 has one of the best ending boss fights ever." Then it's worth checking out, but I don't judge the entire game on it.

Yes, unless you know those spreading it generally share your tastes, but in this particular case (I should have specified it, I know) I was just meaning a very narrow use of word of mouth, specifically targeting negatively biased reviews and explaining why those reviews are flawed.

About review sites, as I don't bookmark them all (and even if I did, my bookmarks are a bloody mess) and I always forget some, I like VGC and GameFaqs games databases because they provide handy links to other sites reviews and other useful infos in a neat way. For older games, PCZone's archive online is still useful for me, but it's only one site and magazine, I can't guarantee they can meet someone else's tastes, and they are specialized on PC games.



Stwike him, Centuwion. Stwike him vewy wuffly! (Pontius Pilate, "Life of Brian")
A fart without stink is like a sky without stars.
TGS, Third Grade Shooter: brand new genre invented by Kevin Butler exclusively for Natal WiiToo Kinect. PEW! PEW-PEW-PEW! 
 


kowenicki said:


I was watching top gear before you were probably even born...  "first season"?

It started in 1977, the current "style" has been in play since 2002.

I dont think a US Top gear will work in the same way a UK one does... not sure that the kind of acidic, non PC and irreverent humour works mainstream over there.

 


There has already been a US one, in fact there is also an Australian one and the UK one and the Australian one did a crossover... it was like CSI... without the CSI bit



 

Bet with Conegamer and Doobie_wop 

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=3879752

Alby_da_Wolf said:

Yes, unless you know those spreading it generally share your tastes, but in this particular case (I should have specified it, I know) I was just meaning a very narrow use of word of mouth, specifically targeting negatively biased reviews and explaining why those reviews are flawed.

About review sites, as I don't bookmark them all (and even if I did, my bookmarks are a bloody mess) and I always forget some, I like VGC and GameFaqs games databases because they provide handy links to other sites reviews and other useful infos in a neat way. For older games, PCZone's archive online is still useful for me, but it's only one site and magazine, I can't guarantee they can meet someone else's tastes, and they are specialized on PC games.

For game reviews, I generally go to metacritic and look over reviews from websites I trust, and maybe a few random reviews for views. Most of the time, I just look at Gametrailers and IGN because when I talk to my friends, those two websites have kind of set the standard for us. They are really massive reviewers.



What is with all the hate? Don't read GamrReview Articles. Contact me to ADD games to the Database
Vote for the March Most Wanted / February Results

Around the Network
AussieGecko said:
kowenicki said:


I was watching top gear before you were probably even born...  "first season"?

It started in 1977, the current "style" has been in play since 2002.

I dont think a US Top gear will work in the same way a UK one does... not sure that the kind of acidic, non PC and irreverent humour works mainstream over there.

 


There has already been a US one, in fact there is also an Australian one and the UK one and the Australian one did a crossover... it was like CSI... without the CSI bit

Yup and the UK series used the Aussie clip half a year after Top Gear Aussie used it to make an episode. Also I believe Top Gear Us prior to the most recent season, never aired. They made a pilot, and thats been suppressed by BBC.

Still, good shows.



What is with all the hate? Don't read GamrReview Articles. Contact me to ADD games to the Database
Vote for the March Most Wanted / February Results

Michael-5 said:

Yup and the UK series used the Aussie clip half a year after Top Gear Aussie used it to make an episode. Also I believe Top Gear Us prior to the most recent season, never aired. They made a pilot, and thats been suppressed by BBC.

Still, good shows.


then how the hell does the forza partnership mean anything then? And how do you know about teh aussie clip? haha



 

Bet with Conegamer and Doobie_wop 

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=3879752

CGI-Quality said:
Michael-5 said:

GT5 only matched GT4 sales during the holiday season. If it trails behind now, and only matched GT4 sales when it had it's holiday boost (where GT4 has year to share that benefit), that implies that overall it will sell less.

Thats why I don't get your point, you agree with me, but contest that I don't look at it like you do? I dunno what your trying to prove..

GT5 jumped ahead of GT4 during the holidays, it didn't just match it:

 

Gran Turismo 5 Sales (PS3) Sales History (Launches Aligned)

Summary of weekly unit sales from launch broken down by region (for first 10 weeks of sale)

Week Americas Japan EMEAA Worldwide Running Total
1 587,933 424,737 1,293,458 2,306,128 2,306,128
2 173,931 59,599 495,715 729,245 3,035,373
3 219,306 26,600 416,705 662,611 3,697,984
4 172,393 18,137 384,813 575,343 4,273,327
5 198,424 14,829 311,178 524,431 4,797,758
6 80,029 17,068 181,640 278,737 5,076,495
7 37,805 10,805 97,366 145,976 5,222,471
8 28,798 5,439 62,915 97,152 5,319,623
9 23,187 3,905 46,867 73,959 5,393,582
10 20,053 3,000 37,016 60,069 5,453,651
Ten Week Totals: 1,541,859 584,119 3,327,673 5,453,651

 

 

Gran Turismo 4 Sales (PS2) Sales History (Launches Aligned)

Summary of weekly unit sales from launch broken down by region (for first 10 weeks of sale)

Week Americas Japan EMEAA Worldwide Running Total
1 770,867 673,884 1,078,304 2,523,055 2,523,055
2 299,629 158,470 542,279 1,000,378 3,523,433
3 152,368 67,665 290,143 510,176 4,033,609
4 95,472 38,793 192,343 326,608 4,360,217
5 68,348 24,019 139,295 231,662 4,591,879
6 47,451 21,191 109,402 178,044 4,769,923
7 31,749 15,124 90,388 137,261 4,907,184
8 25,951 12,062 82,976 120,989 5,028,173
9 20,685 7,603 74,480 102,768 5,130,941
10 18,596 6,569 66,924 92,089 5,223,030
Ten Week Totals: 1,531,116 1,025,380 2,666,534 5,223,030

 

 

As you can see, by Week 5 (during the holidays), GT5 was ahead of GT4 in total WW numbers and remained there the rest of the season (being as much ahead as 230k). In America, it was ahead of GT4 and in EMEAA it was WELL ahead (which is significant because that's GT's strongest region). Japan was the only blunder and GT5 still remained ahead. The overall significance is this; GT5's sales remain frontloaded during the holiday period, which is why it stomped GT4 in certain weeks of the first 10 weeks. It may trail it now, but those sales are leveling out, because we're out of the holidays. It's not like GT4's numbers completely destroy GT5's (which has been my point from the beginning).

With those facts out of the way, and me tired of repeating myself, I'll finalize this debate with you permanently (as in no matter how often from now until GT5 crosses 10 million you respond/quote me, I will not respond to you again - it's pointless): I didn't say GT5 would clear GT4 at the end of it's life (which it doesn't have to anyway). It doesn't have to stay ahead of GT4 the during it's market time to cross 10 million (especially when GT4 is WELL over 10 million).

GT5 could sell 250-400k less than GT4 overall, and still sell 10 million. Right now, it's not even close to being that far behind it. Japan would be the problem, but as of now, it's hardly holding GT5 back.

200k over 5.2 million is not that much over, relax buddy.

Also if GT5 continues to sell at 66% volume of GT4 (It's actually holding less, but I'm being optimistic), it will only sell 9 million. So that would be 1.6 million less then GT4, which isn't that much, but neither will the sales ratio between KZ2 and KZ3 and Halo 3 and Reach.

Why are you repeating yourself? Why are you bringing this all back up? I only said GT5 will sell less then GT4, and you agree, but you're still making an arguement. Why? We were talking about Killzone sales, not GT. What are you trying to prove to me? What is so special about 10 million? I just don't understand you...



What is with all the hate? Don't read GamrReview Articles. Contact me to ADD games to the Database
Vote for the March Most Wanted / February Results

AussieGecko said:
Michael-5 said:

Yup and the UK series used the Aussie clip half a year after Top Gear Aussie used it to make an episode. Also I believe Top Gear Us prior to the most recent season, never aired. They made a pilot, and thats been suppressed by BBC.

Still, good shows.


then how the hell does the forza partnership mean anything then? And how do you know about teh aussie clip? haha

I watch a lot of Top Gear.

The partnership between Forza and Top Gear US, is something to satisfy car enthusiasts. Top Gear US has an audience of 60 million people, Top Gear UK has an audience of 350 million peoples. These shows are massive, and I think it's fair to say people who play racing simulators at least know about these shows. Incorporating Top Gear into Forza or GT, is there to satify fans, and incorperate car culture into gaming.

I mean don't you think having the Top Gear Test track exclusive to GT5 helped boost hype? To me, it's the best event in the game. I've always wanted to test drive the track and see how it feels from an in car perspective to race around the track. Top Gear US isn't as big, but it has potential to grow, and it would still be cool to drive around the track.



What is with all the hate? Don't read GamrReview Articles. Contact me to ADD games to the Database
Vote for the March Most Wanted / February Results

Michael-5 said:

I watch a lot of Top Gear.

The partnership between Forza and Top Gear US, is something to satisfy car enthusiasts. Top Gear US has an audience of 60 million people, Top Gear UK has an audience of 350 million peoples. These shows are massive, and I think it's fair to say people who play racing simulators at least know about these shows. Incorporating Top Gear into Forza or GT, is there to satify fans, and incorperate car culture into gaming.

I mean don't you think having the Top Gear Test track exclusive to GT5 helped boost hype? To me, it's the best event in the game. I've always wanted to test drive the track and see how it feels from an in car perspective to race around the track. Top Gear US isn't as big, but it has potential to grow, and it would still be cool to drive around the track.

I think the biggest thing that MS wanted from this was Top Gear. The fact that they can test the tracks helps the credibility of the game maybe... I dunno its a bunch of bollocks. Top Gear shouldnt choose sides. The track should be open to all imo. 



 

Bet with Conegamer and Doobie_wop 

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=3879752