By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Sales - NGP could outperform 3DS if price, innovation and games are right

jarrod said:
Degausser said:
jarrod said:
Degausser said:
jarrod said:
Degausser said:

 Also my take on third party support is that 3DS will get alot of the Japanese guys behind the device (Who'll put stuff on the NGP too) however the western publishers (Outside of Ubisoft) will just neglect the device pretty much like they did the DS. The NGP fits very well with what EA / Activision do nowadays, in terms of specs and demographic.


This is pretty much what I expect.  Japan's going to move wholesale to 3DS, while the west ports all their HD stuff to NGP.  And honestly, I think there's a decent market there for both.

 I think EA / Activision won't go on port overload to begin with, there'll be a unique Call of Duty, Need for Speed, GTA etc and I guess the sales of those will dictate what sort of support they give from there on. I don't expect Japan to go 'wholesale' to the 3DS either given the PSP's success in the country but I'd look at that on a publisher by publisher basis. 

 The wildcard for Sony is whether they can get studios like Epic, iD, Valve etc behind the device. They typically shied away from handhelds as they're tech based companies, but the NGP looks like it plays well into their interests this time. 

There's never going to be an exclusive COD, NFS, etc, on NGP.  From what developers are telling us, Sony's even selling the system to them as a handheld that can run their PS3 engines... the only way it's going to get any exclusives, rather than ports, of the big western IPs is if Sony bankrolls them directly.  It just doesn't make financial sense for western 3rd parties otherwise, when they're looking at a more limited market than 360/PS3 for the same level of cost.  For COD I could maybe see something like a "Modern Warfare Collection" for launch, essentially an "exclusive" repackaging (that could even be farmed out), but it's not going to get something like an AAA exclusive COD effort.

As far as Japan, PSP's riding on a high right now, but the platform's dead elsewhere.  Games like MGS or KH, games that should easily clear 3-4m worldwide are looking at sales likely half to a third of that... when you combine PSP's western failure with NGP's explosive budget increase, you're looking at a relatively risky platform.  From a Japanese perspective, it's also a platform that more or less hinges entirely on what Capcom decides to do with Monster Hunter, which has to be a bit of a worrying position for any 3rd party deciding now where to invest development for the next few years.  3DS by comparison is a more lateral shift in terms of resources (companies can just bring their PS2/PSP engines over directly, and expect similar budgets going forward), plus Nintendo's now taking a more active role in courting 3rd party content early on... I mean we're already seeing developers and publishers that previously looked to be favoring PSP (SE Osaka, KojiPro, NIS, imageepoch, Namco, Capcom, etc) moving pretty strongly into 3DS.  Honestly, I expect 3DS to get even better Japanese support than DS did, and at a much quicker pace.  It already has really, there's not going to be all that much space left for NGP, and even in Japan I think you'll see a lot of developers simply porting 360/PS3 stuff.

As far as the others you mentioned, Epic's already on board in a big way (UE3 seems pretty central to Sony's NGP strategy) and I could easily see Valve or id join in too.  Epic and id have been big iOS evangelists though, I don't really see NGP support as too big a shift for either since they've been getting into handsets for awhile, it's more a natural inclusion for their multiplatform support.  Valve could be big though, but Valve tends to be a more cautious developer (look how long it took them to start really investing in PS3).

 We'll see. I fully expect to see some sort of exclusive COD (Why else would Sony have lead their NGP software announcement with it?), simply cause Activision are furthering that brand everywhere possible, and they'll make more money off a unique NGP game then just trying to sell more copies of the game already on PS3 / 360.

Sony have absolutely not sold the system as something they want just ports for, and if you've bothered to read any of the developer commentry on the device it's been the complete opposite message. Sony want unique content and that's what they're pushing for (Check the thread from here a few weeks ago... was on the Sony forum though I think).

 And again we've someone who is inflating the NGP's developement cost with no possible source and no possible idea what the thing will cost (Find me a link to say the NGP dev costs the same as a HD console, or as an analogy, that the PSP costs anywhere near the PS2 lol). Sure it'll probably be more then the 3DS's, but the games will probably cost more too, and it'll have a bigger share of games sold via digital distribution, so hell it could end up more profitable for publishers. We can both speculate either way, but truth is, we don't know yet. The one thing we do know, is that every developer who's commented on the device has been positive and that the NGP is extremely accessible for developement and positioned great for anyone who've worked on the PS3 or 360, whether that be ports or just resuing engines / middleware / assets to make new games for less.

 Until E3 we're just speculating on what the NGP will have anyway. Sony's list thing from January had pretty much every publisher on it though, so everyones working on something for the thing. I don't view the NGP having any software trouble near launch, it's whether the thing can sell that software that'll decide if it sustains alot of support. 


Sony led with COD because it's the biggest non-Nintendo franchise in gaming at the moment.  That doesn't mean they have an exclusive lined up, it just means there's getting a game (probably Sledgehammer/Infinity Ward's game for this year).  Financially, unless Sony's paying for it, it just doesn't make sense for Activision to develop a NGP exclusive... they might sell more, but they'd also spend dramatically more.  Why give an exclusive to NGP when it would sell orders of magnitude more on 360/PS3?

And yes, Sony has positioned the system as a handheld that can essentially run PS3 engines.  That's why they showed games like LBP, Killzone and Uncharted, why they made such a big deal out of UE3, why Kojima's talking about his PS3/PSP interoperability "dream game"... it's being sold as a PS3 in your hands (much like PSP was sold as a PS2 in your hands).  I'm also at a bit of a loss as to how you can say I'm "inflating" costs by comparing to HD consoles, when you then go on and essentially say the same thing later on in the same paragraph?

You're right though, we'll have to wait for E3 probably to get any more real insight into software support.  Sony's list of developers was impressive, but there's no guarantee they're all going to end up making games for it.  Back in 1995, Nintendo released a list of over 40 developers who'd singed on as Virtual Boy licensees (including big names like Capcom, Square, Enix, Taito, Konami, Namco, Tecmo, Koei, Bandai and others), and that never exactly amounted to much.

 We'll wait and see on this COD then. I view Activisions strategy as getting as many COD's out there as possible and extending the brand. Having a unique COD for handhelds that can sell lots of copies every year, on top of the console versions, is where they're going with that series, imo. We'll see though at E3 :P.

 Sony, in presentations to developers, have told them they don't want it to just be console ports. Whether this comes to fruition, the current messages is handheld games need to be portable, not just console ports. That's the message anyway, and I guess for every Uncharted shown there was a Little Deviants, or for every Killzone a Reality Fighters.

 I'm just getting perplexed at how people claim to know so much about NGP dev costs despite there being absolutely no article / research on them whatsoever. Handheld games have never cost as much as their console counter parts (For a number of reasons) and we've not yet seen any real source or meaningful research indicate NGP is going into the 8-figure realms of dev cost. My comparison was merely stating that while costs won't be as high as HD console, it'll be driven down even furhter for anyone who works on that type of stuff, as alot of tech can be shared. That could well be wrong, it simply agree with the limited amount of stuff developers have said about the device thus far. 

 There's not alot out there right now about the NGP costs / developement stuff, but the only articles I can find have been skewed towards the positive e.g. http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/2011-02-04-new-ngp-details-emerge-at-private-event . 



Around the Network
darthdevidem01 said:
MARCUSDJACKSON said:
darthdevidem01 said:


Yeah games are definitely important. It really needs that big killer app that can sell systems (DS had Nintendogs as a new IP killer app, then old massive hits like NSMB DS, Pokemon and so on). Basically PSP never did have one of those if we look at its software sales, the closest was the GTA games.

And now in the last two years PSP is just JRPG heaven (thats why I re-bought one after being initially disappointed).

Neither 3DS nor NGP have interested me that much so far, neither are on my to buy list, especially not with the way PS3 and PC (especially PC games line up is so awesome for this year) line up is shaping up this year.

i have to agree with everything you said and more, but theres one thing i left out?

all 20 have to be new IP'S as they will have and atlest 15 have to be published by Sony! i demand alot?

i bought a PS3 knowing Sony would do it for that system and at that time the big3 only needed 8 games (only one manufacture failed at reaching eight), and as we both know Sony well surpassed that!

i'm not as optomistic about NGP reaching this mark as i was about PS3, but they just may do it nad i'll be a handheld gamer and owner for the first time if Sony can do it.

not a fan of 3d so i won't be getting a 3ds.

You are demanding but I guess if that does happen then it proves 2 things:

1. SONY is hell bent upon supporting the product and wants to deliver new experiences 

2. Developers are also willing to support the product and are producing good breakthrough titles instead of PS3 ports etc

I agree SONY really really went all the way with PS3, I think one of the reasons is the high price of the PS3 and initial awful sales (it was selling worse than GBA for its first year!!!!). Who knows if we'll see the same with NGP.

I just hope SONY can divide resources between NGP and PS3 in a fair way. I do not want PS3 line up compromised for NGP.

agreed on all points.

i think Sony can divide resources between NGP and PS3, but i think one will become more like 360 and have a yr or 2 where it's more 3rd party pub/dev then firsty party but i wouldn't put money on it, and PSP still being on the market may not get as much love but only time will tell.

ye first yr 1m less then 360; second yr 16m total. a fire was lit and burnned sony to suprise all.

 i don't doubt Sony for a second (cause we've seen enough egg on faces in th past 5 yr's). all i ask for is dedication from first party, and with 20 or more exclusive games coming out this yr for PS3 alone then it makes you think how could i or why  shouldn't i be demanding right?



The 3DS will be at sale for 250€ AND has very good graphics AND 3D AND the nintendo games AND all the high profile games from third parties.

The NGP will go the way of the PSPgo.



Degausser said:
jarrod said:
Degausser said:
jarrod said:
Degausser said:
jarrod said:
Degausser said:

 Also my take on third party support is that 3DS will get alot of the Japanese guys behind the device (Who'll put stuff on the NGP too) however the western publishers (Outside of Ubisoft) will just neglect the device pretty much like they did the DS. The NGP fits very well with what EA / Activision do nowadays, in terms of specs and demographic.


This is pretty much what I expect.  Japan's going to move wholesale to 3DS, while the west ports all their HD stuff to NGP.  And honestly, I think there's a decent market there for both.

 I think EA / Activision won't go on port overload to begin with, there'll be a unique Call of Duty, Need for Speed, GTA etc and I guess the sales of those will dictate what sort of support they give from there on. I don't expect Japan to go 'wholesale' to the 3DS either given the PSP's success in the country but I'd look at that on a publisher by publisher basis. 

 The wildcard for Sony is whether they can get studios like Epic, iD, Valve etc behind the device. They typically shied away from handhelds as they're tech based companies, but the NGP looks like it plays well into their interests this time. 

There's never going to be an exclusive COD, NFS, etc, on NGP.  From what developers are telling us, Sony's even selling the system to them as a handheld that can run their PS3 engines... the only way it's going to get any exclusives, rather than ports, of the big western IPs is if Sony bankrolls them directly.  It just doesn't make financial sense for western 3rd parties otherwise, when they're looking at a more limited market than 360/PS3 for the same level of cost.  For COD I could maybe see something like a "Modern Warfare Collection" for launch, essentially an "exclusive" repackaging (that could even be farmed out), but it's not going to get something like an AAA exclusive COD effort.

As far as Japan, PSP's riding on a high right now, but the platform's dead elsewhere.  Games like MGS or KH, games that should easily clear 3-4m worldwide are looking at sales likely half to a third of that... when you combine PSP's western failure with NGP's explosive budget increase, you're looking at a relatively risky platform.  From a Japanese perspective, it's also a platform that more or less hinges entirely on what Capcom decides to do with Monster Hunter, which has to be a bit of a worrying position for any 3rd party deciding now where to invest development for the next few years.  3DS by comparison is a more lateral shift in terms of resources (companies can just bring their PS2/PSP engines over directly, and expect similar budgets going forward), plus Nintendo's now taking a more active role in courting 3rd party content early on... I mean we're already seeing developers and publishers that previously looked to be favoring PSP (SE Osaka, KojiPro, NIS, imageepoch, Namco, Capcom, etc) moving pretty strongly into 3DS.  Honestly, I expect 3DS to get even better Japanese support than DS did, and at a much quicker pace.  It already has really, there's not going to be all that much space left for NGP, and even in Japan I think you'll see a lot of developers simply porting 360/PS3 stuff.

As far as the others you mentioned, Epic's already on board in a big way (UE3 seems pretty central to Sony's NGP strategy) and I could easily see Valve or id join in too.  Epic and id have been big iOS evangelists though, I don't really see NGP support as too big a shift for either since they've been getting into handsets for awhile, it's more a natural inclusion for their multiplatform support.  Valve could be big though, but Valve tends to be a more cautious developer (look how long it took them to start really investing in PS3).

 We'll see. I fully expect to see some sort of exclusive COD (Why else would Sony have lead their NGP software announcement with it?), simply cause Activision are furthering that brand everywhere possible, and they'll make more money off a unique NGP game then just trying to sell more copies of the game already on PS3 / 360.

Sony have absolutely not sold the system as something they want just ports for, and if you've bothered to read any of the developer commentry on the device it's been the complete opposite message. Sony want unique content and that's what they're pushing for (Check the thread from here a few weeks ago... was on the Sony forum though I think).

 And again we've someone who is inflating the NGP's developement cost with no possible source and no possible idea what the thing will cost (Find me a link to say the NGP dev costs the same as a HD console, or as an analogy, that the PSP costs anywhere near the PS2 lol). Sure it'll probably be more then the 3DS's, but the games will probably cost more too, and it'll have a bigger share of games sold via digital distribution, so hell it could end up more profitable for publishers. We can both speculate either way, but truth is, we don't know yet. The one thing we do know, is that every developer who's commented on the device has been positive and that the NGP is extremely accessible for developement and positioned great for anyone who've worked on the PS3 or 360, whether that be ports or just resuing engines / middleware / assets to make new games for less.

 Until E3 we're just speculating on what the NGP will have anyway. Sony's list thing from January had pretty much every publisher on it though, so everyones working on something for the thing. I don't view the NGP having any software trouble near launch, it's whether the thing can sell that software that'll decide if it sustains alot of support. 


Sony led with COD because it's the biggest non-Nintendo franchise in gaming at the moment.  That doesn't mean they have an exclusive lined up, it just means there's getting a game (probably Sledgehammer/Infinity Ward's game for this year).  Financially, unless Sony's paying for it, it just doesn't make sense for Activision to develop a NGP exclusive... they might sell more, but they'd also spend dramatically more.  Why give an exclusive to NGP when it would sell orders of magnitude more on 360/PS3?

And yes, Sony has positioned the system as a handheld that can essentially run PS3 engines.  That's why they showed games like LBP, Killzone and Uncharted, why they made such a big deal out of UE3, why Kojima's talking about his PS3/PSP interoperability "dream game"... it's being sold as a PS3 in your hands (much like PSP was sold as a PS2 in your hands).  I'm also at a bit of a loss as to how you can say I'm "inflating" costs by comparing to HD consoles, when you then go on and essentially say the same thing later on in the same paragraph?

You're right though, we'll have to wait for E3 probably to get any more real insight into software support.  Sony's list of developers was impressive, but there's no guarantee they're all going to end up making games for it.  Back in 1995, Nintendo released a list of over 40 developers who'd singed on as Virtual Boy licensees (including big names like Capcom, Square, Enix, Taito, Konami, Namco, Tecmo, Koei, Bandai and others), and that never exactly amounted to much.

 We'll wait and see on this COD then. I view Activisions strategy as getting as many COD's out there as possible and extending the brand. Having a unique COD for handhelds that can sell lots of copies every year, on top of the console versions, is where they're going with that series, imo. We'll see though at E3 :P.

 Sony, in presentations to developers, have told them they don't want it to just be console ports. Whether this comes to fruition, the current messages is handheld games need to be portable, not just console ports. That's the message anyway, and I guess for every Uncharted shown there was a Little Deviants, or for every Killzone a Reality Fighters.

 I'm just getting perplexed at how people claim to know so much about NGP dev costs despite there being absolutely no article / research on them whatsoever. Handheld games have never cost as much as their console counter parts (For a number of reasons) and we've not yet seen any real source or meaningful research indicate NGP is going into the 8-figure realms of dev cost. My comparison was merely stating that while costs won't be as high as HD console, it'll be driven down even furhter for anyone who works on that type of stuff, as alot of tech can be shared. That could well be wrong, it simply agree with the limited amount of stuff developers have said about the device thus far. 

 There's not alot out there right now about the NGP costs / developement stuff, but the only articles I can find have been skewed towards the positive e.g. http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/2011-02-04-new-ngp-details-emerge-at-private-event . 

thats the major part of your post i agree with.

in saying that though i beleive dev cost will be at PS2 level's only becuase its being siad that its easy to dev for although PS2 wasn't easy to dev for, but cost weren't that high.



They're going after different markets... so technically the NGP could sell less then the 3DS and be more successful.



Around the Network
SpartenOmega117 said:

You know what would be interesting for sony to do one day for PS3/NGP. If porting is so easy maybe they can make combo packs, like dvd/blu ray combo pack. You buy a PS3 game for $60-$70 and it also includes a code/memory format to download and play it on NGP. So it will be a really nice incentive so you can play both at home and on the go. It might drive both ps3 and NGP sales. PS3/NGP combo packs could be really interesting. .......Doubt it will happen though

thats the ONLY way i see how people could be excited about the "i can play my ps3 games on the go"

i mean seriously who would buy Uncharted 4 for the PS3 at $60 ad Uncharted 4 for the NGP at ?$50?, just so you can play on the go?  You would get one or the toher, not both. 



silicon said:

They're going after different markets... so technically the NGP could sell less then the 3DS and be more successful.

The NGP will be selling to martian cows?



Above: still the best game of the year.

Beuli2 said:
silicon said:

They're going after different markets... so technically the NGP could sell less then the 3DS and be more successful.

The NGP will be selling to martian cows?

NOOOOOOOOOO!!!  i had a monopoly going on martian cows.  stupid sony, cutting into my demographic market



Beuli2 said:
silicon said:

They're going after different markets... so technically the NGP could sell less then the 3DS and be more successful.

The NGP will be selling to martian cows?


NGP hardcore gaming market off the bat. 3DS mass market consumer product. It's subtle.

There's some cross over etc, but there's a difference.



$350 would be absurdly high, and the 3DS would destroy it at that price point. I'm not saying that it should cost less than that, simply that in the likely scenario that it costs more, it will not sell as well as its Nintendo counterpart, which isn't really a bad thing if you think about it.

As for the name, Sony seems to adore action verbs of late, so I'm going with PS Flow, or something similar. I really don't think the "Portable" will be in there - it's not a very popular brand any more, and it takes away from the fluidity (har) of the name.



(Former) Lead Moderator and (Eternal) VGC Detective