NotStan said:
Alby_da_Wolf said:
NotStan said:
Your comparison of the modern advertising methods to the previously used soviet propaganda are amusing. You're right, I am sure MS goes off to kidnap a family in order to blackmail opposition, or it opresses any religion or open mindness amongst it's consumers, or claim that the world revolves around MS products. Really the comparison is laughable, what you're doing is reading too much into the events that occur, not everything has a hidden message like it used to in the time of Soviet development. Yeah I may be young, but History is an interesting aspect for me, Soviet Russia in particular so I did pay great attention, as they say "In Soviet Russia, party finds you!".
|
I already answered you in a previous post that these are the techniques communist parties used in western and neutral countries, where they didn't hold absolute power and people were free to express not communist opinions and counter propaganda. In Soviet Russia methods were very different, although also there Stalin always started a smear campaign against his future victims before eliminating them, for example like he did with Yagoda, Bukharin, and most notably Trotsky.
And there is really nothing strange in a western corporation using soviet propaganda techniques, some of them worked quite well to persuade million simpletons people.
BTW, I always clearly wrote "propaganda", pure words and nothing else, not violent methods.
|
So going by your assumption, MS is currently spreading propaganda about Sony and Nintendo in an attempt to bring them down in the eyes of the public? Before attempting to go for the undercut? That sound insane if you thinkg about it.
And I think such methods existed even before Stalin, it is always the norm to bring down the opposition in the eyes of the public before making a move that may end them.
If anything, the attacks in regards to Kinect needing a controller in order to work properly by Sony or several articles that were posted before, slating Kinect could fall into that category. If it is a practice a you are suggesting, it's a common one, every company does it, so I don't see the reason to single out MS in this case.
Just to clarify, I do not like MS, I like 360 and PS3 to some extent, but when people making assumptions like that it's only logical to correct them in a sense that everyone does it.
|
As I wrote answering other people, I know these methods existed before Lenin and Stalin, but Soviet Union, together with Mussolini, were the first to apply a scientific, systematic approach to the matter, and all the even barely acceptable amongst their methods were quickly recognized as highly effective and adopted by both not marxist politicians and, outside of politics, publicists and marketing experts.
About MS, I'm sure it will never directly smear competitors, and it's also cautious just attacking them, the most direct things I could see up until now are Greenberg's rants, Turn 10's attacks and trash talk against GT5, and, many years ago, Ballmer's mafia-style vague, impersonal, indirect threats against Marc Andreessen and Netscape, throwing chairs to Google and ridiculous attacks against Linux and GPL ("Get the Facts" campaign, "cancer" and similar BS).
As I wrote elsewhere, I also know that other companies use these methods, but when trolling and astroturfing, Sony minions are never as subtle and stealthy as MS ones, you can bust them easily.
Nintendo fans and also its official propaganda are a lot more direct. Nintendo's typical trait is ignoring competitors with understated superiority, while its most enthusiastic fans shift from superiority when Ninty crushes competitors to anger and whining when things don't go so well. But Ninty is also as good as MS or even more to create buzz and hype. Who could have been Nintendo's strongest astroturfer, Malstrom, suddenly went off his head and began believing he's God, and now he's liked only by a small inner circle, while he managed to get almost everybody else angered with his attitude, not good astroturfing by any means.