By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Sony Discussion - GT5 graphics aren't that impressive

Lol at my supposed 20 min install time, but it'll be worth it.



Around the Network
-Newcloud- said:

quick question where is the top gear test track? do you have to get to a certain level or something to unlock it?

You unlock it after completing the Special Event related to it, the one with the VW Sambabus.



Current PC Build

CPU - i7 8700K 3.7 GHz (4.7 GHz turbo) 6 cores OC'd to 5.2 GHz with Watercooling (Hydro Series H110i) | MB - Gigabyte Z370 HD3P ATX | Gigabyte GTX 1080ti Gaming OC BLACK 11G (1657 MHz Boost Core / 11010 MHz Memory) | RAM - Corsair DIMM 32GB DDR4, 2400 MHz | PSU - Corsair CX650M (80+ Bronze) 650W | Audio - Asus Essence STX II 7.1 | Monitor - Samsung U28E590D 4K UHD, Freesync, 1 ms, 60 Hz, 28"

jhuff394 said:
deskpro2k3 said:
sieanr said:
 

 

There are several racing sims on PC that are far better simulators then GT5. And I'm not talking about a slightly better physics engine, but a physic engine that simulates the cars frame, the effect of torque on the drive shaft, tyre deformation, ect. GT5 may be the most realistic on consoles (Forza is close if not better), but the most realistic racing sim ever? Not by a long shot.


Ok stop right there. You haven't played the game so please silence yourself. Everything you post is either false evidence to your claims and is irrelevant because you're constantly changing your argument. If you actually played the game I would hold your words to some credibility to your claims. Do you get off by making post like this? lol


I agree.....

secondly... name the simulator that is "far better"...

 

What argument? You must get off by jumping to premature conclusions. I've hardly presented any sort of argument, outside of noting the severe inconsistency with GT5s graphics. But if you want to discuss actually sim racing physics, then lets go.


iRacing

Rfactor

NK Pro

Gran Prix Legends

LFS

All of these games top GT5 in terms of realism. Now you probably think GT created the sim racing genre (it didn't, not by a long shot), or that its the most realistic sim racer around (its never been anywhere close). And those games I listed are doing plenty of physics simulations that GT5 is not, like tire deformation and heat (this is why GT5 doesn't have cold starts, as it lacks this feature), aerodynamic simulations (not just look up tables ala GT), frame warping, suspension simulation, driver physics so the camera will bob around accurately, tires with dynamic wear, dirt and heatspots, clutch overheating, ect, ect. These are all features GT5 lacks, not to mention a proper form of damage modeling. Oh, and don't even try to bring up GTs laughable rally mode.

EDIT: Oh, and GT5s physics run at 60hz, while rfactor runs at 300hz. Does that count as quantitatively demonstrating GTs short comings?

Feel free to disagree, but there is a reason that those games are used in racing schools and by racing teams while GT5 is gets packed in bundles.



Leo-j said: If a dvd for a pc game holds what? Crysis at 3000p or something, why in the world cant a blu-ray disc do the same?

ssj12 said: Player specific decoders are nothing more than specialized GPUs. Gran Turismo is the trust driving simulator of them all. 

"Why do they call it the xbox 360? Because when you see it, you'll turn 360 degrees and walk away" 

kowenicki said:
justinian said:
CGI-Quality said:
jhuff394 said:

To everyone who has commented....

I am assuming you are all on a high quality 1080P hd tv... made by Sony, Samsung, LG, Phillips, or Sharp...

Otherwise.. don't bother commenting...

I saw this on a Sony Bravia 52" 1080P 240HZ display.. and couldn't tell it apart from real life.

I'll be on a 32" 1080p Samsung LCD 60hz (2009)

I saw it on a 42" 1080 200Hz - I think it was 200hz -  LG and it was pretty damn good.

The truth is not many X360 lovers (not saying the OP is) is gonna say it's better than Forza..... It's a fact of life.

Some members are so predictable you already knew what they were gonna say about GT5 (or any PS3 game) long before release.

 


thats just weak...  look at the pics, read the reviews and take it on the chin.

You "saw it" on a 42"... I am playing it right now on a 46" 1080p 120hz...   It is what it is.

Having a bigger screen just makes things look worse, unless your sitting further away of course.

Anyone know if GT5 is running at 1920x1080 or 1280x1080 like Prologue?



-Newcloud- said:

quick question where is the top gear test track? do you have to get to a certain level or something to unlock it?


Its in the Special Events section! You need to be level 3 or something to unlock the Top Gear Test Track beginner mode challenges. I only finished the first of the two, the second one with the Elise and zero driving aids is surprisingly hard!



Around the Network

i heard it was really good for the premium cars you could actually see the bolts and stuff 

didnt actually play it so cant say for sure



CGI-Quality said:

OK, I just had my first race, and do see where some of the visual complaints come from. A tad of aliasing, especially on some of the shadows, but in-game driving graphics look about what I expected, and the replays don't look really much different than the racing portion. If you're concerned that it doesn't look too different than Prologue, don't fret. Aliasing is improved over Prologue, as are textures and car details.

My current grade: 9/10

Best looking racing game thus far, and definitely Gran Turismo.

After playing a few more hours I have to say I think my view (on the visuals) is improving. It was an 8/10 now I think is more in line with your score.

It also seems that the jagged shadows are only for the cars. Environmental shadows still seem crisp (likely due to the fact they're static?). Also, the trees whilst ugly, actually look OK when driving past them at 100 MPH, so I think I can kinda understand why they didn't bother with 3D trees. The city tracks are what have really impressed me with their sheer detail, and the lighting has seen a significant improvement over Prologue.

Comparing the environments with Forza 3 I think part of the differences people notice actually come down to the different dev mentality of East vs West. In Forza (West) they used various shader effects, normal and bump mapping in the environment, whereas GT (East) uses detailed artistry which can clearly be seen in the city tracks with the detailed buildings but less so on some simpler circuits.



Nsanity said:
Scoobes said:

The important stuff (premium cars, track etc.) look good. You've got to remember this game needs to run at 1080P, 60 fps and with up to 16 cars on the track. Some of the background textures could be improved and some anti-alising on the shadows would go a long way, but when racing you really don't notice. Haven't tried out a wet race yet so can't comment on that.


GT5 is 1280X1080P native and can drop well below 60FPS at times.

That res is still very high for a PS3 game. Not sure about FPS as I haven't noticed a dip so I'm assuming remains over 30.



deskpro2k3 said:
sieanr said:
 

 

There are several racing sims on PC that are far better simulators then GT5. And I'm not talking about a slightly better physics engine, but a physic engine that simulates the cars frame, the effect of torque on the drive shaft, tyre deformation, ect. GT5 may be the most realistic on consoles (Forza is close if not better), but the most realistic racing sim ever? Not by a long shot.


Ok stop right there. You haven't played the game so please silence yourself. Everything you post is either false evidence to your claims and is irrelevant because you're constantly changing your argument. If you actually played the game I would hold your words to some credibility to your claims. Do you get off by making post like this? lol


No idea whether sieanr has played GT5 or not, but I'd guess he's talking about something like iRacing on PC. It's considerred a very realistic sim:

http://iracing.com/

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IRacing.com



sieanr said:

What argument? You must get off by jumping to premature conclusions. I've hardly presented any sort of argument, outside of noting the severe inconsistency with GT5s graphics. But if you want to discuss actually sim racing physics, then lets go.


iRacing

Rfactor

NK Pro

Gran Prix Legends

LFS

All of these games top GT5 in terms of realism. Now you probably think GT created the sim racing genre (it didn't, not by a long shot), or that its the most realistic sim racer around (its never been anywhere close). And those games I listed are doing plenty of physics simulations that GT5 is not, like tire deformation and heat (this is why GT5 doesn't have cold starts, as it lacks this feature), aerodynamic simulations (not just look up tables ala GT), frame warping, suspension simulation, driver physics so the camera will bob around accurately, tires with dynamic wear, dirt and heatspots, clutch overheating, ect, ect. These are all features GT5 lacks, not to mention a proper form of damage modeling. Oh, and don't even try to bring up GTs laughable rally mode.

EDIT: Oh, and GT5s physics run at 60hz, while rfactor runs at 300hz. Does that count as quantitatively demonstrating GTs short comings?

Feel free to disagree, but there is a reason that those games are used in racing schools and by racing teams while GT5 is gets packed in bundles.


I would have said any one that lets you change the tire pressure, lol.