RolStoppable said: And the Dualshock 3 is a refurbished Dualshock 2 which was a refurbished Dualshock. And the 360 is a refurbished... um... 360. |
Lmao...that was good!
RolStoppable said: And the Dualshock 3 is a refurbished Dualshock 2 which was a refurbished Dualshock. And the 360 is a refurbished... um... 360. |
Lmao...that was good!
Metallicube said:
Ok, so then what is quality? See what I mean.. ANYTHING you answer, will be your opinion, which means it is relative. What is it about Resident Evil 5 for instance that makes it so superior to Just Dance? What if a 12 year old girl loves Just Dance but can't stand Resident Evil. Is she right or are you? You both have equal fun when playing your respective games, so who's to say one opinion is more "valid" than the other? Again, I realize we all have our own definition of quality,variety is the spice of life and all that, but what I am saying is the only way something relative like "quality" can truely be MEASURED in a concrete way is to look at what the MOST people like, in other words, SALES. It is the biggest sample size. Think of a politician; if a politician recieves the most votes, they are generally viewed as the best politician suited for office. Sales work in a similar way, as people are voting with their wallets. They are investing their hard earned money in them, and thus saying "this is what I view to be best, and I'm showing my support by spending my money on it." Think of many of the works of art, artists, entertainers, authors, books, games, movies, etc. of the past that we currently consider to be the standard of quality in our society. They are likely people/things/ideas that recieved the most popularity and thus have withstood the test of time in society. The things that weren't as popular faded, and were forgotten, because they weren't as liked. The things that stand the test of time are generally the things that recieve the most acclaim, or sales. And it's these things that are viewed in the grand scheme of things as being of the most quality. The McDonald's comparison is laughable. Much of its food is notoriously BAD for you. Thus it is of less quality (for the human body at least).. Is playing Wii "bad for you?" I doubt you could make a serious argument that it is. In fact, it is actually quite good for you. Just look at Wii Fit :) |
Quality in games is very easy to define- the games with highest quality are those that push the hardware restrictions to the boundaries of what's possible for the system. Therefore SMG1&2 are top quality games even if i don't want to even touch them with 10 foot long pole Just Dance is low quality which happens to be fun for some people.
Also political analogy would be correct if we lived in ancient Athens but since Romans invented populism it's hard to assosiate word quality with politicians. Especially when president election in USA can depend on who looked better in tv debate.
Now you mention books but can you honestly say that Twilight saga is high quality book ? It's written like a crap and yet sells shitload of pieces. Also a lot of what we know as quality authors or painters died in poverty because they had problems with finding buyers for their stuff.
With the current day trend if something sells well it's usually sign it's accesible mainstream product , high quality stuff usually doesn't sell nowhere near it.
PROUD MEMBER OF THE PSP RPG FAN CLUB
guiduc said: I don't know what's the problem this generation, nobody seems able to reach Super Mario Galaxy's 2 graphics but it seems Nintendo can. 3DS should save the relationship between N and 3rd. |
lol, no. 3DS already has an insanely impressive prelaunch lineup (moreso than basically any Nintendo system since SNES), and the most visually stunning titles (MGS3D, RE Revelations) are 3rd party.
3ds already got all the big 3rd party titles.
Wii is an upgraded cube rather than refurbished if anything.Its top looking games beat by a mile Cubes COUNTERPARTS.
Cant imagine how good Rogue would look now.
intro94 said: 3ds already got all the big 3rd party titles. |
At the very least, smoother polygon models and a lot more effects.
A flashy-first game is awesome when it comes out. A great-first game is awesome forever.
Plus, just for the hell of it: Kelly Brook at the 2008 BAFTAs
It is a fact that the Wii is basically a refurbished Gamecube, this has been confirmed many times. Even most components are basically identical, with the major difference being that both the cpu and gpu of the Wii are clocked 50% higher than they were in the Gamecube. This is only logical since the production process hade been improved over the years.
Also the Wii has a total of 88mb compared to the Gamecube's 40mb, but again using the same architecture.
So again yes the Wii is more powerfull than the Gamecube, but it's mostly the same machine. Furthermore in some parts like the cpu even the old Xbox is said to be slightly more powerfull than a Wii.
AnthonyW86 said: It is a fact that the Wii is basically a refurbished Gamecube, this has been confirmed many times. Even most components are basically identical, with the major difference being that both the cpu and gpu of the Wii are clocked 50% higher than they were in the Gamecube. This is only logical since the production process hade been improved over the years. Also the Wii has a total of 88mb compared to the Gamecube's 40mb, but again using the same architecture. So again yes the Wii is more powerfull than the Gamecube, but it's mostly the same machine. Furthermore in some parts like the cpu even the old Xbox is said to be slightly more powerfull than a Wii. |
no, the wii cpu is quite stronger, using Power PC rather than much older pentium III tech of the xbox. Theres only one thing ,and thats the shader unit supporting that older CPU of the Xbox. Wii has to do the shading processes within the GPU itself.
AnthonyW86 said: It is a fact that the Wii is basically a refurbished Gamecube, this has been confirmed many times. Even most components are basically identical, with the major difference being that both the cpu and gpu of the Wii are clocked 50% higher than they were in the Gamecube. This is only logical since the production process hade been improved over the years. Also the Wii has a total of 88mb compared to the Gamecube's 40mb, but again using the same architecture. So again yes the Wii is more powerfull than the Gamecube, but it's mostly the same machine. Furthermore in some parts like the cpu even the old Xbox is said to be slightly more powerfull than a Wii. |
You are wrong though. The Wii's memory isn't the same technology at all. It's not only over twice as much memory, it's also much faster with much lower latencies. And Wii's PowerPC CPU is at least 2 times as powerful as the crappy Xbox's Pentium.
I found this on Wikipedia so I don't know how reliable it is.
Technical specifications
Nintendo has released few technical details regarding the Wii system, but some key facts have leaked through the press. Though none of these reports has been officially confirmed, they generally point to the console as being an extension or advancement of the Nintendo GameCube architecture. More specifically, the reported analyses state that the Wii is roughly 1.5 to 2 times as powerful as its predecessor.[1][111] Based on the leaked specifications, the Wii is the least powerful of the major home consoles in its generation.
Wii specs given by Wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wii#Technical_specifications
Processors:
Memory:
Ports and peripheral capabilities:
Built-in content ratings systems: |
Storage:
Video:
Audio:
Power consumption:
|
Gamecube specs given by Wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nintendo_gamecube#Technical_specifications
Central processing unit: Main article: Gekko (microprocessor)
System memory:
Connectivity:
|
Graphics processing unit:
Storage media: For more details on this topic, see Nintendo optical discs.
|
So if anyone would like they can compare for themselves and realize that the Wii is more powerful. So instead of calling it a "refurbished Gamecube," which would indicate the same hardware, it would be more accurate to call the Wii an "advanced Gamecube" of sorts.
Either way, like I said in a previous post, I am enjoying my "advanced Gamecube" so I really don't care what one developer states. Also, just because one developer states this doesn't mean he/she speaks for all of Ubisoft.
I hope this helps with this debate. If it doesn't then at least I tried :).
RolStoppable said: And the Dualshock 3 is a refurbished Dualshock 2 which was a refurbished Dualshock. And the 360 is a refurbished... um... 360. |
OH the tears! They won't stop flowing! ROFLOL