That's a ton, granted, but not a megaton. A megaton would be like, a Metroid game by Team Ninja, developed exclusively for the Playstation 3. It would be a megaton because it would mean a partnership between Sony and Nintendo, and everyone involved in gaming would care, sites would crash, fanboys would cry, ect..

A new metroid game is not a megaton. The only new games that I can think of that are ever really megatons are Final Fantasy(not that MMO bullshit they call final fantasy) and Zelda. Considering we already know about zelda and 3DS, nintendo needs a hardware upgrade or a huge partnership deal to win E3. Same for everyone. The last megaton game announcement was at the MS press conference 2 years ago, in that twilit grotto where all became clear.

I don't say it to get under peoples' skin, it's just my opinion.

no i dont think so i think that Sony playstation will take it again with killzone3,littlebigplanet2,resistance3,Agent,Infamous2,Socom 4 and many more

There is no opinion about something being a game or a tech demo, a tech demo is something like Sony showed off last year with the Move, where there's no real game built around it, everything was there only to show off the technology.

It's just like if I said "The sun is green" because it's my "opinion" it's not opinion cause the sun is clearly yellow, there comes a point you can't hide behind "opinions" cause that seems to be happening a lot on the forums where trying to bash something is now all "opinion" when all anyone has ever asked for is something constructive if you don't like something state legit reasons not to like it with examples and not "these games are rubbish and don't appeal to me, it's my opinion and you can't say it isnt!" it's really frustrating and it also breaks the content rule...

Is it 2006 again or something?

Lol.

Nice comparison there. While Wii Sports is simply very barebones and is considered a tech demo by some, not only me, you just say something that is as random as the sun being green according to opinion, while its color is clearly non-debatable, unlike WS's existence as a game or a tech demo.

 So what if it has some games built around it? They're all very simple and do not much beyond showing off the wiimote tech in a fun way. Sony's demo at E3 09 was also with a sort of an extremely barebones archery show. Is it a game? No. It's too barebones to be one.

You've asked for constructive, well, here it is.

There isn't a lack of games on the Wii.. Nor is there a lack of good games. I can name at least a dozen must have AAA games, and dozens more that are good/great games.

Really? You couldn't go 2 paragraphs without completely contradicting yourself? If you want to hate Nintendo for no real reason it is fine. Just don't try to justify it here with crap like this. You cannot praise one company for sequels, and then turn around to bash another for the exact same damn thing.

Since you don't seem to know the definition of a game

From websters:

"a physical or mental competition conducted according to rules with the participants in direct opposition to each other" 

Wii Sports fits the definition, a tech demo lacks rules or an end to the game, it simply shows off the tech.  It is something that is defined, just like color, therefore my analogy fits, just because other people don't seem to understand the difference between a game and a tech demo doesn't mean you're anymore in the right, just means there's more people in the wrong, it's just like a crap load of people can't seem to use irony right.  It's not that hard to understand...

I don't consider any of the PS3 games to be real games. I shall now go about saying that the PS3 has no games, and that will be fine right? I can rag on it for being a waste of a console space because as we just established, it has no games. Further I am going to say that anything that costs more than $298 is a worthless piece of crap designed to trick idiots into buying it. I can now safely call all PS3 owners idiots for buying a worthless piece of crap with no games. See how fun the opinion game gets?

In reality the above is a load of shit. Poisoning the well of discussion with vitriol is counter-productive, and annoying. If you hate the game, then ignore it. State you can't stand it. State you can't possibly see how it would be fun. But to call a game that has been reviewed by every major publication, and is sold stand-alone in certain regions not a game because of your opinion? That is just trying to piss people off for the sake of pissing them off.