You people asking me questions do realize I didn't write this, correct? I simply thought it was an amusing read.
You people asking me questions do realize I didn't write this, correct? I simply thought it was an amusing read.
patjuan32 said:
Sorry, but review scores do not equal quality. That's for the gamer to decide. |
I prefer review scores from people who have actually played the game over forum posts that say "isn't that game Blue a mediocre title????" based on absolutely no first hand experience.
...
haha i loled hard at that crash commercial... fanboys took these commercials seriously back then now where just laughing it off, just like what the commercials towards Nintendo today will become in the future lol
Torillian said:
that's the point though, if Bamboleo is never going to play both and compare for himself (which he obviously hasn't done before making this statement) he'll just have to trust other indicators which seem to show the two being similar quality. |
I suppose I have to agree:
mai said:
Well, I can't find either. Damn history and it's double standards =) Got one, this is it? |
Yes! Thats the video ad...there is a print version too.
And I got the other :)
http://66.186.34.59/specials/adspecial4/sports.jpg
And found the final one.
http://66.186.34.59/specials/adspecial4/dkc-hype.jpg
tsk tsk Nintendo.
Torillian said:
I prefer review scores from people who have actually played the game over forum posts that say "isn't that game Blue a mediocre title????" based on absolutely no first hand experience. |
That's your prerogative. However, as I stated before, a review score does not determine the quality of a game, Gamers do.
If Nintendo is successful at the moment, it’s because they are good, and I cannot blame them for that. What we should do is try to be just as good.----Laurent Benadiba
Torillian said:
it has an 83 on meta, which is pretty similar to the last Mario Kart game so I doubt there is a huge difference in quality between the two. |
My bad, but I mean mediocre in the sense of "yay, yet another Burnout wannabe". This Blur game will fail commercially and Activision knows that, so nothing better than mocking a famous racing game to gather some attention.
Imagine HVS eventually making fun of Halo... It's the very same scenario.
mike_intellivision said: You notice that it was only the leader (or recently deposed leader) who gets mocked. There was no need to mock most of the N64 or the GC life. There was a great reason to mock the Gameboy and SNES. And there is again with the Wii. Mike from Morgantown |
Who could ever be so insane to mock the N64?
disolitude said:
Yes! Thats the video ad...there is a print version too. And I got the other :) http://66.186.34.59/specials/adspecial4/sports.jpg And found the final one. http://66.186.34.59/specials/adspecial4/dkc-hype.jpg tsk tsk Nintendo. |
Wow, if you look at the "The Green Flag" excerpt from the first jpg. image, the same situation is occuring with Nintendo now! LOL I don't feel like typing it all manually, but that should go in my sig lol
Leatherhat on July 6th, 2012 3pm. Vita sales:"3 mil for COD 2 mil for AC. Maybe more. " thehusbo on July 6th, 2012 5pm. Vita sales:"5 mil for COD 2.2 mil for AC."
disolitude said: Yes! Thats the video ad...there is a print version too. And I got the other :) http://66.186.34.59/specials/adspecial4/sports.jpg And found the final one. http://66.186.34.59/specials/adspecial4/dkc-hype.jpg tsk tsk Nintendo. |
I liked "no gimmicks" remark in the second ad =)
Well, probably the reason for Nintendo downfall at the time, it began in SNES era. They backfire at the opponents with this stupidity competitors were throwing at them for quite a while, became too focused on teenagers audience and eventually loosing at this ad war. Maybe I'm wrong but do they were more diverse with their ads in late 80s? Like "You could get old if you stop playing" Game Boy ad?