PSP was more of a flop. But even there, for such a low budget game(compared to typical 3d gtas), it was worth quite a profit.
I think it did fantastic, because not all DS owners are the same demographic. To say that , IN ANY gaming demographic, theres 1 million owners willing to buy your top down game, is great.
basically:
there were 1 million DS owners willing to buy a top down 3d GTA.
there were less than 500k psp owners willing to do the same.(for whatever reasons as long as they keep being more hardcore).
True they had GTA SA before and it sold super better.Who tells you it wouldnt have sold as much ore better on the DS? CW at least is a sample of the same age group and its a promising one.
Spin off games tend to sell fractions of the usual franchise(pokemon ranger vs pokemon gold), and nobody says ranger is a flop for selling a fraction of pokemon gold.
Finally, fanboys, the sales of Top down GTAS have never been so good before. Comparing it to 3d gtas is out of the mark.
To put it in perspective, if there was a 3d GTA for DS (or 3ds), the sales would(apparently, from the CW-ds vs psp) be in proportion, really good. Or even greater.
Finally, GT4 costed at least 10 or 20 times more to promote, produce and launch than this tiny game that merely carried the brand name, as good as it was.the profit proportion was the same.I know TK2 expected the PSP version to do fantastic just based on the premise that they would buy A top down GTA as much as a 3d one but i think they saw the errors of their ways instead of blaming(or rushing to blame), the DS demographic.