By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - Killzone 2 Has 72% More Head Polygon Count than Halo: Reach

Strategyking92 on 28 February 2010

same difference. Apparently they're both last gen consoles.



And that's the only thing I need is *this*. I don't need this or this. Just this PS4... And this gaming PC. - The PS4 and the Gaming PC and that's all I need... And this Xbox 360. - The PS4, the Gaming PC, and the Xbox 360, and that's all I need... And these PS3's. - The PS4, and these PS3's, and the Gaming PC, and the Xbox 360... And this Nintendo DS. - The PS4, this Xbox 360, and the Gaming PC, and the PS3's, and that's all *I* need. And that's *all* I need too. I don't need one other thing, not one... I need this. - The Gaming PC and PS4, and Xbox 360, and thePS3's . Well what are you looking at? What do you think I'm some kind of a jerk or something! - And this. That's all I need.

Obligatory dick measuring Gaming Laptop Specs: Sager NP8270-GTX: 17.3" FULL HD (1920X1080) LED Matte LC, nVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M, Intel Core i7-4700MQ, 16GB (2x8GB) DDR3, 750GB SATA II 3GB/s 7,200 RPM Hard Drive

Around the Network
Pipedream24 on 28 February 2010

I could be wrong, but hasn't the use of higher quality textures, bump mapping, normal mapping, dynamic lighting/shadows, and higher Anti-Aliasing become just as important (if not more) than cranking up the polygon count to produce realistic looking graphics. Reducing the polygon count reduces the load on the CPU/GPU allowing for more effects to be put in place.



Seece on 28 February 2010
Carl2291 said:
Seece said:
Carl2291 said:
Seece said:
Carl2291 said:
Killzone 2 released a year ago.

Halo Reach isn't releasing for a long time.

That is all.

lol, you're funny sometimes Carl, when it's in favour of Reach you're all "Oh but Killzone is OLD so it's uncomparable" yet when it's in favour of Killzone it's fair play?

You like to flamebait people don't you?

1. I was actually sticking up for Reach. Basicly saying wait until it's released and we have the full game.

2. Yes.

I know I'm going to get those stupid "conspiracy" agenders thrown at me, but I didn't read your post like that at all, more you rubbing in the fact Killzone is old yet still beats out Reach.

Nah, you can see from my other post bringing co-op into it that i'm actually sticking up for Reach. Now stop conspiring against me already.

You backtracked? so what?



 

ameratsu on 28 February 2010

Someone named Killzone2KingFPS inciting system wars? lol...



Demon's Souls Official Thread  | Currently playing: Left 4 Dead 2, LittleBigPlanet 2, Magicka

Seece on 28 February 2010

I kinda agree with Leo, never played Uncharted 2 and Heavy Rain ect, but they look amazing, I think Halo Reach and Alan Wake are the only 2 games that can be worthy of even discussing graphics vs graphics, it doesnt help with selnor making threads about nearly every game under the sun being OMGZ BEST GRAPHICS EVER! Although I enjoy those threads so I'm not bashing you Selnor



 

Around the Network
iLLmaticV3 on 28 February 2010

So....Killzone 2 has more graphics!?



Odd. Future. Wolf. Gang. Kill. Em. All. OFWGKTA Don't give a fuck!

Fuck Steve Harvey. FREE EARL!

Final Fantasy Versus XIII will be the GREATEST game EVER made!!!

I'd take a bullet for Square-Enix! 

 

mosen on 28 February 2010
4k1x3r said:
mosen said:

http://www.bungie.net/images/Games/Reach/images/cutouts/Trooper_left1.jpg

These KZ2 screens are from the PRE ALPHA version, -_- you didn't even play Killzone 2, plus, because of the Post-processing filter, screens can't do justice to the game, and can only be enjoyed in movement. Anyway FOR THE LOVE OF GOD, IF YOU WANT TO COMPARE THESE GAMES WAIT AT LEAST UNTIL REACH IS RELEASED... leave Rach the time to come out. -_-

then explaine me why IGN posted these KZ2 screens in May 20, 2009 and January 29, 2009 ? 

http://ps3.ign.com/dor/objects/748475/killzone-2/images/killzone-2-20090520114541074.html?page=mediaFull

http://ps3.ign.com/dor/objects/748475/killzone-2/images/killzone-2-20090129014112294.html?page=mediaFull

PRE ALPHA version ? the pics from Halo : Reach are from the PRE ALPHA version !! :))

when the title of this topic is about comparison of these Games and the OP can't do justice , then why I'm not allow to compar this games ?

 



Carl on 28 February 2010
Seece said:
Carl2291 said:
Seece said:
Carl2291 said:
Seece said:
Carl2291 said:
Killzone 2 released a year ago.

Halo Reach isn't releasing for a long time.

That is all.

lol, you're funny sometimes Carl, when it's in favour of Reach you're all "Oh but Killzone is OLD so it's uncomparable" yet when it's in favour of Killzone it's fair play?

You like to flamebait people don't you?

1. I was actually sticking up for Reach. Basicly saying wait until it's released and we have the full game.

2. Yes.

I know I'm going to get those stupid "conspiracy" agenders thrown at me, but I didn't read your post like that at all, more you rubbing in the fact Killzone is old yet still beats out Reach.

Nah, you can see from my other post bringing co-op into it that i'm actually sticking up for Reach. Now stop conspiring against me already.

You backtracked? so what?

Stop it with your conspiring.

If i was flamebaiting it would have been much easier to wind up Sony fans and talk about sales.



                            

wholikeswood on 28 February 2010

This whole thread is so stupid because it proves and means nothing.

Still, a cookie to mosen for posting the worst screen of KZ2 that exists on the internet. Nice comparison work there, pal.



ameratsu on 28 February 2010

@mosen: Quoting several photos is extremely obnoxious. At least break the image links before quoting it.



Demon's Souls Official Thread  | Currently playing: Left 4 Dead 2, LittleBigPlanet 2, Magicka