The question I have for you all that have been voting or will vote in the future is also in the OP, please comment below:
I am considering moving the voting to survey monkey for future polls because it will allow a lot more options than 10 so people can truly vote for their favorite, but I've discovered an even more accurate way (ranked voting). My question to you all is, of the three options below, which kind of poll would you prefer? I want the most accurate polling possible, but not at the expense of votes because of it being too complex:
1) Voting as it is now with 10 choices and comment votes beyond that.
2) Voting on Survey Monkey with every independent developer/owner of developers as an option that presented games at E3.
3) The above, except instead of traditional voting we do ranked voting where you have to literally rank every presenter.
------------------- (details below) ------------------
Hello, I enjoy, like many of you, voting on who I thought won each E3. I also think it would be fun to have an ongoing leaderboard thread for E3’s (this one and all the past ones). To that end, I’m going to be updating this thread regularly by having votes on various E3’s from the past. I will start with the very first one, outlying games shown by each company. If you’d like to vote that would be great! I will plan on changing out which E3 we are voting on every so often after enough people have voted.
I am starting with the first and will work my way towards the more modern ones. I’ll be including every major presenter, not just the big three. For simplicity and speed, I will be using other resources, such as WIKI, in order to list off things that were shown/unveiled/announced. Also, since the poll limits me to 10 choices, I will have to cut out some presentations. I will try to focus on studios that announced games that were less significant, historically, or on systems that were short-lived.
This is now the main hub/thread for tracking total results.