Should Xbox End their Generation Early?

[Mnementh]

Hardstuck-Platinum said:

Mnementh said:

You can *objectively* say Starfield is a bad game? I don't think anyone can. The factor is more: is it fun for some people. And indeed it is. And the more objective factors you call upon with your comparison to turkey twizzlers are for example microtransactions and loot boxes. I would agree that would be bad - but they aren't present in Starfield. So your comparison really falls flat. It is about subjective factors, and as I already told: by subjective factors I didn't even like Starfield. But concluding on personal tastes it is a bad game, if clearly some people like it would be very bad of me, as I cannot dictate my personal tastes over that of others.

By personal tastes I dislike the Tomb Raider Reboot, God of War and GTA V. But I cannot in all seriousness conclude these are bad games, just not my cup of tea.

I just watched a video of a youtuber apologising for giving starfield a good review. He was saying he was blinded by hype and that the game is not just bad, but a slap in the face to all Bethesda fans. Would that happen to a game that isn't objectively bad? Have you ever seen that happen with any other game? People apologising for a positive review? With all the numerous loading screens how could you not say the game is objectively bad? 

Oh sure, another Youtuber realizing drama brings in more views than honest opinions is the epitome of objective. I guess Forspoken and Immortals of Aveum are objectively better games, as not as much Youtubers make drama videos about them. I guess all the reviewers that put Starfield into 80+ Meta and Forspoken and Immortals in the 60s are just paid shills.

And I already said: grat and much praised games have loading screens.