Mnementh on 31 December 2023
Hardstuck-Platinum said:
Mnementh said:
You can *objectively* say Starfield is a bad game? I don't think anyone can. The factor is more: is it fun for some people. And indeed it is. And the more objective factors you call upon with your comparison to turkey twizzlers are for example microtransactions and loot boxes. I would agree that would be bad - but they aren't present in Starfield. So your comparison really falls flat. It is about subjective factors, and as I already told: by subjective factors I didn't even like Starfield. But concluding on personal tastes it is a bad game, if clearly some people like it would be very bad of me, as I cannot dictate my personal tastes over that of others. By personal tastes I dislike the Tomb Raider Reboot, God of War and GTA V. But I cannot in all seriousness conclude these are bad games, just not my cup of tea. |
I just watched a video of a youtuber apologising for giving starfield a good review. He was saying he was blinded by hype and that the game is not just bad, but a slap in the face to all Bethesda fans. Would that happen to a game that isn't objectively bad? Have you ever seen that happen with any other game? People apologising for a positive review? With all the numerous loading screens how could you not say the game is objectively bad? |
Oh sure, another Youtuber realizing drama brings in more views than honest opinions is the epitome of objective. I guess Forspoken and Immortals of Aveum are objectively better games, as not as much Youtubers make drama videos about them. I guess all the reviewers that put Starfield into 80+ Meta and Forspoken and Immortals in the 60s are just paid shills.
And I already said: grat and much praised games have loading screens.
3DS-FC: 4511-1768-7903 (Mii-Name: Mnementh), Nintendo-Network-ID: Mnementh, Switch: SW-7706-3819-9381 (Mnementh)
my greatest games: 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023
10 years greatest game event!
bets: [peak year] [+], [1], [2], [3], [4]