By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - PC Discussion - Carzy Zarx’s PC Gaming Emporium - Catch Up on All the Latest PC Gaming Related News

Jizz_Beard_thePirate on 08 July 2020
EricHiggin said:
Captain_Yuri said:

Well the problem with being in AMD's position and competing against Nvidia is that Nvidia will try to match almost every price point. AMD releases 5600 XT, Nvidia responds with 2060 KO. AMD releases 5700, Nvidia responds with 2060 Super price cut. AMD releases 5700 XT, Nvidia sandwiches it by re-releasing 2070 and releasing 2070 Super. AMD releases anything lower than a 5600 XT and Nvidia has a billion iterations of 1650/1660/1660Ti.

The thing with beefing up existing features is that it only really works if the competition sacrificed existing features for those new features therefore having less performance in return. Nvidia stayed relatively the same sure but AMD only caught up. So you have a situation where Nvidia is giving you good-excellent rasterization performance + giving you a taste of the future while having the full feature set ready for next generation vs AMD is giving you good-very good rasterization for the similar price with worse driver support...

There is certainly a market for AMD cards no doubt and the once in a few years crypto boom that seems to happen also helps with AMD's sales. But it's a position of uncertainty as Nvidia is playing in the same space.

I like this analogy but I don't think it's quite works in this comparison. Waiting for AMD drivers doesn't get you a better driver than what Nvidia gives you in day one. Waiting on AMD driver allows you to play the games like the Nvidia people have been playing all this time.

And yea that's true but it is a risky business being in second place as your competitor gets to dedicate how much profit you can have which I would say isn't very good for business.

So if AMD can't beat Nvidia on price point since they will match it or come close, what's AMD's incentive to undercut Nvidia or themselves? Why bother with dedicated (consumer) GPU's at all if you're surrounded?

Could Nvidia have done more with existing (hardware) features if they left out things like RT on the 2000 series? Did they really do the right thing that was best for the consumer? Based on the 3000 series leaks, it seems like the consumers agreed, prices be damned. AMD likes money too just by chance.

I don't just mean drivers. What about waiting for prices to get to a point where they are at the very least, reasonable, top to bottom? If fewer people bought in so early, the prices would flat line and remain there since they won't drop much without serious competition along with a price war. Some people won't wait though, so why offer better pricing? In fact, why not keep increasing?

Second place has it's benefits as well though. You aren't expected to always have the newest features. You aren't expected to have the best tech. You're seen as the underdog, which helps a lot if you ever decide to take a shot at the title. The fall is a lot further from the top.

Cause if they have similar price but worse drivers and less features. What incentive is there to buy AMD?

Nvidia could have certainly had better performance sure but by having these features baked into Turing, they now have experience as to what works and what doesn't. Take DLSS for example, 1.0 was terrible. 2.0, incredible. Now going into 3000 series, they will probably have even more of an improved version. Then you have ray tracing. RDNA 2 will be AMD's first attempt and it might be good but this will be Nvidia's second generation which should mean greater gains. Now one could argue that consumer are the ones getting screwed but since the alternative is not having any of these at all while having lower or similar performance... I think most people would rather have the first generation features + the similar performance even if the first gen features are not fully ready for prime time. Since the prices are similar that is.

Well if AMD wants to price like Nvidia, it won't be reasonable... Personally I don't consider the 5000 prices very reasonable myself as they lack Ray Tracing, Tensor cores and DX12 Ultimate.

That's true.



                  

PC Specs: CPU: 7800X3D || GPU: Strix 4090 || RAM: 32GB DDR5 6000 || Main SSD: WD 2TB SN850

EricHiggin on 08 July 2020
Chazore said:
EricHiggin said:

Second place has it's benefits as well though. You aren't expected to always have the newest features. You aren't expected to have the best tech. You're seen as the underdog, which helps a lot if you ever decide to take a shot at the title. The fall is a lot further from the top.

But that's the thing though, AMD is coming in now with lesser drivers, lesser tech and still going for Nvidia's pricing ideals, which is just going to end with them at a net loss, and hardly anyone will want to bother with them, when Nvidia is already on their 2nd gen RT, while AMD charges the same price and hardly bothering, let alone not adding in tech like DLSS, GFE (still lacking in the AMD dept for many features GFE has) as well as GFN (which was a boon for CDPR showing off Cyberpunk to review outlets during the pandemic, where's AMD's neato extremely helpful feature and pro push for that?).

MS has also been the underdog for years now in the console space. Sony's been pulling ahead time and time again, they've got the money and mind-share, deals made all around, now we've got the sweet spot Epic+Sony buddying up, with MS and no one (Nvidia isn't helping them, AMD, god knows wtf they are pushing that's as worthy as what Nvidia is bringing to PC gaming, to Xbox levels). MS has been playing that title for years now and it's hardly helped them pull a massive, heavy hitting, outta the park hit, that lands them a top spot, which you would naturally and eventually think an underdog would achieve in the end, but they've yet to get to that point, and we both know they won't, because Sony's got next gen in the bag thanks to mind-share and partnerships, just like how Nvidia has an insane amount of mind-share with their GPU's and tech. 

I just don't see how being an underdog-=being the same as top place or it somehow being a good position to stay comfortable in for decades on end. Being 2nd place for years just shows you cannot last forever, and that you're just not good enough. I already look at MS as having lost the console space for some time now. I'm just waiting for them to eventually drop it and move back to PC, because let's face it, that's where they started, that's where they ultimately belong.

They never really belonged or fit in all that well with the console space, and sales, lacking mind-share and memorable content (outside of shooty shooty bang bang titles) just prove this over time. Maybe if they take this upcoming gen by a complete storm, and firmly secure it throughout the new gen, then maybe I'd pay credence to that underdog anology, but right now, I don't see it as being something of a good thing. 
Captain_Yuri said:
EricHiggin said:

So if AMD can't beat Nvidia on price point since they will match it or come close, what's AMD's incentive to undercut Nvidia or themselves? Why bother with dedicated (consumer) GPU's at all if you're surrounded?

Could Nvidia have done more with existing (hardware) features if they left out things like RT on the 2000 series? Did they really do the right thing that was best for the consumer? Based on the 3000 series leaks, it seems like the consumers agreed, prices be damned. AMD likes money too just by chance.

I don't just mean drivers. What about waiting for prices to get to a point where they are at the very least, reasonable, top to bottom? If fewer people bought in so early, the prices would flat line and remain there since they won't drop much without serious competition along with a price war. Some people won't wait though, so why offer better pricing? In fact, why not keep increasing?

Second place has it's benefits as well though. You aren't expected to always have the newest features. You aren't expected to have the best tech. You're seen as the underdog, which helps a lot if you ever decide to take a shot at the title. The fall is a lot further from the top.

Cause if they have similar price but worse drivers and less features. What incentive is there to buy AMD?

Nvidia could have certainly had better performance sure but by having these features baked into Turing, they now have experience as to what works and what doesn't. Take DLSS for example, 1.0 was terrible. 2.0, incredible. Now going into 3000 series, they will probably have even more of an improved version. Then you have ray tracing. RDNA 2 will be AMD's first attempt and it might be good but this will be Nvidia's second generation which should mean greater gains. Now one could argue that consumer are the ones getting screwed but since the alternative is not having any of these at all while having lower or similar performance... I think most people would rather have the first generation features + the similar performance even if the first gen features are not fully ready for prime time. Since the prices are similar that is.

Well if AMD wants to price like Nvidia, it won't be reasonable... Personally I don't consider the 5000 prices very reasonable myself as they lack Ray Tracing, Tensor cores and DX12 Ultimate.

That's true.

So that you don't end up with one GPU company that can do whatever they want (assuming Intel Xe hasn't caught up). Just look at what happened to Intel core CPU's.

If Radeon market share won't increase much no matter what AMD does, then what are they supposed to do? Create worthy consumer GPU's for cheap just for the sake of it? Since it's highly unlikely that AMD can take both the CPU and GPU crown, and since AMD is clearly more focused on CPU's, then they should just keep doing what their doing by milking their GPU's until Nvidia takes the entire market from them regardless? In which case, assuming Intel Xe is still trailing where Radeon was at, and Nvidia has almost the entire market to itself, they won't get absolutely out of control when it comes to pricing, or eventually slack off?

Setting expectations too high and continually buying into the most popular brand could lead to ending up with just Nvidia as the majority discreet GPU manufacturer, which would be the worst possible scenario. Ryzen moments are not the norm and shouldn't be the expectation.

Being the underdog for too long can eventually become a major problem for a company and all consumers of those products, because lack of competition over long periods time leads to even worse problems.

I think MS was initially more so in the console space to keep SNY out of the PC space, and not just gaming. MS losing a few billion to protect it's hundreds of billions from becoming tens of billions makes sense.



vivster on 08 July 2020

@EricHiggin
My issue is here that with AMD adjusting their prices up to Nvidia, they are actually doing the worse thing. Nvidia has raised their prices in the past 5 years considerably, but that coincides with them putting out banger after banger of GPU. Nvidia architectures haven't just been great because the lack of competition, they are great just on their own and compared to their own products. Nvidia has been innovating and not holding back any performance even though they easily could've. Their price hikes may not be completely justified but you know what's even less justified? AMD adjusting their prices up without delivering competitive products.

If you go hard on Nvidia for high prices you should go even harder on AMD if they follow it up. If we want prices to come down due to competition then AMD has to price their chips at the level we would like them to have based on their performance and features. But we already know AMD won't do that.

Nvidia's higher prices are basically just our self imposed tax for them not putting on the breaks when they could've due to a lack of competition.



If you demand respect or gratitude for your volunteer work, you're doing volunteering wrong.

Jizz_Beard_thePirate on 08 July 2020
EricHiggin said:
Captain_Yuri said:

Cause if they have similar price but worse drivers and less features. What incentive is there to buy AMD?

Nvidia could have certainly had better performance sure but by having these features baked into Turing, they now have experience as to what works and what doesn't. Take DLSS for example, 1.0 was terrible. 2.0, incredible. Now going into 3000 series, they will probably have even more of an improved version. Then you have ray tracing. RDNA 2 will be AMD's first attempt and it might be good but this will be Nvidia's second generation which should mean greater gains. Now one could argue that consumer are the ones getting screwed but since the alternative is not having any of these at all while having lower or similar performance... I think most people would rather have the first generation features + the similar performance even if the first gen features are not fully ready for prime time. Since the prices are similar that is.

Well if AMD wants to price like Nvidia, it won't be reasonable... Personally I don't consider the 5000 prices very reasonable myself as they lack Ray Tracing, Tensor cores and DX12 Ultimate.

That's true.

So that you don't end up with one GPU company that can do whatever they want (assuming Intel Xe hasn't caught up). Just look at what happened to Intel core CPU's.

If Radeon market share won't increase much no matter what AMD does, then what are they supposed to do? Create worthy consumer GPU's for cheap just for the sake of it? Since it's highly unlikely that AMD can take both the CPU and GPU crown, and since AMD is clearly more focused on CPU's, then they should just keep doing what their doing by milking their GPU's until Nvidia takes the entire market from them regardless? In which case, assuming Intel Xe is still trailing where Radeon was at, and Nvidia has almost the entire market to itself, they won't get absolutely out of control when it comes to pricing, or eventually slack off?

Setting expectations too high and continually buying into the most popular brand could lead to ending up with just Nvidia as the majority discreet GPU manufacturer, which would be the worst possible scenario. Ryzen moments are not the norm and shouldn't be the expectation.

Being the underdog for too long can eventually become a major problem for a company and all consumers of those products, because lack of competition over long periods time leads to even worse problems.

I think MS was initially more so in the console space to keep SNY out of the PC space, and not just gaming. MS losing a few billion to protect it's hundreds of billions from becoming tens of billions makes sense.

Right but most people won't think like that. People won't throw away 100s of dollars so they can donate to AMD and keep them alive while having a worse experience.

They need to keep trying cause if they don't, they will keep on losing market share until they get axed.

Nvidia is already the majority.

Personally I do like AMD. I really do. I was one of the first gen buyers as I owned a Ryzen 7 1700. Now I have a 3900X. I am a bit salty that I am not getting 4000 series but it wasn't like I was gonna upgrade to it anyway. I don't want an Intel situation although Nvidia's will probably be worse in terms of pricing than intel if they were the only ones left. But that doesn't mean I am going to donate to AMD since I am not a charity. AMD needs to find a way out of the hole they are in with their GPUs. And right now while their CPU's are very popular is the best time to do it as they can afford to take risks. Cause if Intel comes back at full force while they are struggling against Nvidia, it will once again, not be a good outlook for them. It wasn't too long ago they were bleeding money left and right. They fixed a big leak but there's still one left. Before the second Intel ice burg hits, they better have fixed the other leak cause otherwise... Back to the Penny stock they go...

Personally I think RDNA2 could be their ticket if they play their cards right. They don't need to be the performance king, they need to be the value king. Not similar price but less features and less performance cause that's not good value imo.



                  

PC Specs: CPU: 7800X3D || GPU: Strix 4090 || RAM: 32GB DDR5 6000 || Main SSD: WD 2TB SN850

EricHiggin on 08 July 2020
vivster said:

@EricHiggin
My issue is here that with AMD adjusting their prices up to Nvidia, they are actually doing the worse thing. Nvidia has raised their prices in the past 5 years considerably, but that coincides with them putting out banger after banger of GPU. Nvidia architectures haven't just been great because the lack of competition, they are great just on their own and compared to their own products. Nvidia has been innovating and not holding back any performance even though they easily could've. Their price hikes may not be completely justified but you know what's even less justified? AMD adjusting their prices up without delivering competitive products.

If you go hard on Nvidia for high prices you should go even harder on AMD if they follow it up. If we want prices to come down due to competition then AMD has to price their chips at the level we would like them to have based on their performance and features. But we already know AMD won't do that.

Nvidia's higher prices are basically just our self imposed tax for them not putting on the breaks when they could've due to a lack of competition.

That's what people said about Intel before Ryzen showed up. Something is only the best of the best until it's not.

Now I agree that it doesn't seem as though Nvidia slacked off on the same level that Intel had, but when they strategically launch models against the competition with just the right timing, as well as price cuts at times, are they really being all that they can be for the consumer? Could those products and cheaper prices not have come sooner?

AMD likely won't do that because it will probably mean Radeon only sells marginally more and will just end up losing money, or selling more GPU's for the same profit anyway. In that case AMD might as well make as much as they can by doing as little as they can within reason.



EricHiggin on 08 July 2020
Captain_Yuri said:
EricHiggin said:

So that you don't end up with one GPU company that can do whatever they want (assuming Intel Xe hasn't caught up). Just look at what happened to Intel core CPU's.

If Radeon market share won't increase much no matter what AMD does, then what are they supposed to do? Create worthy consumer GPU's for cheap just for the sake of it? Since it's highly unlikely that AMD can take both the CPU and GPU crown, and since AMD is clearly more focused on CPU's, then they should just keep doing what their doing by milking their GPU's until Nvidia takes the entire market from them regardless? In which case, assuming Intel Xe is still trailing where Radeon was at, and Nvidia has almost the entire market to itself, they won't get absolutely out of control when it comes to pricing, or eventually slack off?

Setting expectations too high and continually buying into the most popular brand could lead to ending up with just Nvidia as the majority discreet GPU manufacturer, which would be the worst possible scenario. Ryzen moments are not the norm and shouldn't be the expectation.

Being the underdog for too long can eventually become a major problem for a company and all consumers of those products, because lack of competition over long periods time leads to even worse problems.

I think MS was initially more so in the console space to keep SNY out of the PC space, and not just gaming. MS losing a few billion to protect it's hundreds of billions from becoming tens of billions makes sense.

Right but most people won't think like that. People won't throw away 100s of dollars so they can donate to AMD and keep them alive while having a worse experience.

They need to keep trying cause if they don't, they will keep on losing market share until they get axed.

Nvidia is already the majority.

Personally I do like AMD. I really do. I was one of the first gen buyers as I owned a Ryzen 7 1700. Now I have a 3900X. I am a bit salty that I am not getting 4000 series but it wasn't like I was gonna upgrade to it anyway. I don't want an Intel situation although Nvidia's will probably be worse in terms of pricing than intel if they were the only ones left. But that doesn't mean I am going to donate to AMD since I am not a charity. AMD needs to find a way out of the hole they are in with their GPUs. And right now while their CPU's are very popular is the best time to do it as they can afford to take risks. Cause if Intel comes back at full force while they are struggling against Nvidia, it will once again, not be a good outlook for them. It wasn't too long ago they were bleeding money left and right. They fixed a big leak but there's still one left. Before the second Intel ice burg hits, they better have fixed the other leak cause otherwise... Back to the Penny stock they go...

Personally I think RDNA2 could be their ticket if they play their cards right. They don't need to be the performance king, they need to be the value king. Not similar price but less features and less performance cause that's not good value imo.

Ok but you pointed out that Nvidia will try to price match Radeon or close enough, so unless AMD purposely sells at cost, how can they compete? It seems to me that if Radeon is less performing and cheap or expensive, they lose, the same performance for slightly less or the same, they lose, so the only chance in a situation like this, is to simply be the very best and then there's no reason not to sell the most while charging the most, right?



Jizz_Beard_thePirate on 08 July 2020
EricHiggin said:
Captain_Yuri said:

Right but most people won't think like that. People won't throw away 100s of dollars so they can donate to AMD and keep them alive while having a worse experience.

They need to keep trying cause if they don't, they will keep on losing market share until they get axed.

Nvidia is already the majority.

Personally I do like AMD. I really do. I was one of the first gen buyers as I owned a Ryzen 7 1700. Now I have a 3900X. I am a bit salty that I am not getting 4000 series but it wasn't like I was gonna upgrade to it anyway. I don't want an Intel situation although Nvidia's will probably be worse in terms of pricing than intel if they were the only ones left. But that doesn't mean I am going to donate to AMD since I am not a charity. AMD needs to find a way out of the hole they are in with their GPUs. And right now while their CPU's are very popular is the best time to do it as they can afford to take risks. Cause if Intel comes back at full force while they are struggling against Nvidia, it will once again, not be a good outlook for them. It wasn't too long ago they were bleeding money left and right. They fixed a big leak but there's still one left. Before the second Intel ice burg hits, they better have fixed the other leak cause otherwise... Back to the Penny stock they go...

Personally I think RDNA2 could be their ticket if they play their cards right. They don't need to be the performance king, they need to be the value king. Not similar price but less features and less performance cause that's not good value imo.

Ok but you pointed out that Nvidia will try to price match Radeon or close enough, so unless AMD purposely sells at cost, how can they compete? It seems to me that if Radeon is less performing and cheap or expensive, they lose, the same performance for slightly less or the same, they lose, so the only chance in a situation like this, is to simply be the very best and then there's no reason not to sell the most while charging the most, right?

They essentially need a hail marry architecture that can allow them to do just that. Zen wasn't just a better version of FX or a better version of what Intel was doing with their consumer cpus. It was very different architecture. They need something like it. Whether or not they can do it and whether or not Nvidia is too far ahead is another question entirely. They can try to charge comparable prices sure but that's a very short term strategy that won't go very far as charging similar pricing changes the perspective from underdog value company to Pricey but worse. Why would people want to cheer for AMD if they are gonna do the similar horrible pricing as Nvidia but without the features and drivers? Cause that would mean that if AMD were top, they aren't gonna bring prices down, they would increase it further while giving you less than Nvidia...



                  

PC Specs: CPU: 7800X3D || GPU: Strix 4090 || RAM: 32GB DDR5 6000 || Main SSD: WD 2TB SN850

Jizz_Beard_thePirate on 08 July 2020

Chip size and power supply details leaked – NVIDIA Ampere GA102 in Samsung’s 8 nm increasingly likely. Grain of salt plox.



https://www.igorslab.de/en/chipsize-leaked-vidia-ampere-ga102-in-sams-8-nm-lpp-always-more-likely/

Intel introduces Thunderbolt 4 combining the best of Thunderbolt 3 and USB4 with universal connectivity and enhanced security. This might mean we get to see thunderbolt on Ryzen laptops sometime next year. It does have the same bandwidth as thunderbolt 3 and the improvements are very minor. We probably won't get much of an improvement until Intel fully adopts PCI-E 4.0.

https://www.notebookcheck.net/Intel-introduces-Thunderbolt-4-combining-the-best-of-Thunderbolt-3-and-USB4-with-universal-connectivity-and-enhanced-security.480661.0.html

AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX spotted, could launch next week

https://videocardz.com/newz/amd-ryzen-threadripper-pro-3995wx-spotted-could-launch-next-week

Last edited by Jizz_Beard_thePirate - on 08 July 2020

                  

PC Specs: CPU: 7800X3D || GPU: Strix 4090 || RAM: 32GB DDR5 6000 || Main SSD: WD 2TB SN850

JEMC on 08 July 2020

The news:

SALES /PLAYER COUNT & DEALS

Get a pile of Telltale games plus Oxenfree and Heaven's Vault in the new Humble Bundle
https://www.pcgamer.com/get-a-pile-of-telltale-games-plus-oxenfree-and-heavens-vault-in-the-new-humble-bundle/
Do you like adventure games? Of course you do! Everybody likes adventure games! And with that established, I present to you the new Humble Summer Adventure Games Bundle, a very impressive collection of narrative-focused experiences.

GOG has a new sale and two new releases with ample discounts:

When it comes to Steam, let me remind you that the Summer Sale will end in roughly 26 hours. If you're debating on getting that game or not, you're running out of time to make a decision!

And Fanatical has three new deals:

SOFTWARE & DRIVERS

-empty-

MODS, EMULATORS & FAN PROJECTS

Mortal Kombat Project Revitalized 2 Definitive Edition 2020 announced with new trailer
https://www.dsogaming.com/news/mortal-kombat-project-revitalized-2-definitive-edition-2020-announced-with-new-trailer/
The MKA Team has announced a brand new version of its amazing Mortal Kombat MUGEN game, Mortal Kombat Project Revitalized 2. Mortal Kombat Project Revitalized 2 Definitive Edition 2020 is coming soon, and below you can find a gameplay trailer for it.
Mortal Kombat Project Revitalized 2 Definitive Edition 2020 will feature new fatalities, characters and stages. It will also pack a number of gameplay tweaks and enhancements. You can witness some of these improvements in the following gameplay trailer.

Now you can play Minecraft in Half-Life
https://www.pcgamer.com/now-you-can-play-minecraft-in-half-life/
You can play Minecraft on your console, your phone, on Windows 10 or in Java, but is that really enough? No, of course not. There are still loads of places where you can't play Minecraft. Why can't I build a castle on an ATM? That might be an impossible dream, but at least I can now play it in Half-Life.
Half-Craft is a work-in-progress mod from b4n4n4 that ports Minecraft to the GoldSrc engine, finally letting Gordon Freeman take a break from dodging headcrabs to build himself a lovely cabin, or maybe a giant stone cock—his options are limitless.

GAMING NEWS

Mafia Definitive Edition has been delayed until September 25th
https://www.dsogaming.com/news/mafia-definitive-edition-has-been-delayed-until-september-25th/
2K Games and Hangar 13 have announced a delay for Mafia Definitive Edition. Although the teams were planning to release this upcoming remake on August 28th, they have decided to delay it until September 25th.

SteelRising is the next-gen game from SPIDERS, first teaser trailer
https://www.dsogaming.com/news/steelrising-is-the-next-gen-game-from-spiders/
Nacon has just announced the next major game from SPIDERS, SteelRising. SteelRising will be coming to next-gen platforms exclusively (obviously this also includes the PC). In order to celebrate this announcement, Nacon released a teaser trailer that you can find below.

Nacon officially announces Test Drive Unlimited Solar Crown
https://www.dsogaming.com/news/nacon-officially-announces-test-drive-unlimited-solar-crown/
As promised, Nacon has announced the next part in the Test Drive Unlimited series, Test Drive Unlimited Solar Crown. Test Drive Unlimited Solar Crown is in a really early development stage right now. Thus, we don’t know when it will come out. However, you can find below a teaser trailer for it.
>> If you haven't watched it yet, don't expect much from the teaser.

Werewolf: The Apocalypse – Earthblood releases in 2021, will be exclusive to Epic Games Store
https://www.dsogaming.com/news/werewolf-the-apocalypse-earthblood-releases-in-2021-gets-first-gameplay-trailer/
Nacon has just announced that Werewolf: The Apocalypse – Earthblood will release in 2021. In order to celebrate this announcement, the publisher has also released the first gameplay trailer for it.

Vampire: The Masquerade – Swansong is another Epic Games Store exclusive, gets new trailer
https://www.dsogaming.com/news/vampire-the-masquerade-swansong-is-another-epic-games-store-exclusive-gets-new-trailer/
Following the EGS announcement for Werewolf: The Apocalypse – Earthblood, Nacon has also revealed that Vampire: The Masquerade – Swansong will be coming to the PC via Epic Games Store. This new Vampire: The Masquerade game will be coming to the PC, exclusively on Epic Games Store, in 2021.

New in-game screenshots leaked online from Watch Dogs Legion
https://www.dsogaming.com/screenshot-news/new-in-game-screenshots-leaked-online-from-watch-dogs-legion/
A few slightly blurry screenshots of Ubisoft’s upcoming Watch Dogs Legion have made their way onto Reddit. According to the thread, these particular in-game images were leaked by Chinese Media during their preview of the game earlier today.
>> "Leaked". What an easy way to get some talk about the game before showing more at Ubi's upcoming event.

Nacon announces a new motorcycle racing game, RiMS Racing
https://www.dsogaming.com/news/nacon-announces-a-new-motorcycle-racing-game-rims-racing/
Nacon has just announced a new motorcycle game, RiMS Racing. RiMS Racing is being developed by Race Ward Studio, and uses Kylotonn Games’ engine. This motorcycle game will be friendly to newcomers, though it also promises to set new standards to its genre.

New Tom Clancy’s Ghost Recon Breakpoint Update will add AI Teammates
https://www.dsogaming.com/news/new-tom-clancys-ghost-recon-breakpoint-update-will-add-ai-teammates/
Ubisoft has announced that a new update for Tom Clancy’s Ghost Recon Breakpoint will add support for AI Teammates. This new AI mode will most likely work similar to the one found in Tom Clancy’s Ghost Recon Wildlands. Moreover, the French company has released a teaser trailer for this mode that you can find below.

Here are seven minutes of higher quality & 60fps gameplay footage from Assassin’s Creed Valhalla
https://www.dsogaming.com/pc-performance-analyses/here-are-seven-minutes-of-higher-quality-60fps-gameplay-footage-from-assassins-creed-valhalla/
A couple of days ago, we shared 30 minutes of leaked gameplay footage from Assassin’s Creed Valhalla. And today, a brand new gameplay video has been leaked online. This video features higher quality image, and was captured at 60fps. Thus, and contrary to the previous leak, this new one looks much, much better.

The Dark Pictures: Little Hope releases on October 30th
https://www.dsogaming.com/news/the-dark-pictures-little-hope-releases-on-october-30th/
Bandai Namco has just announced that The Dark Pictures: Little Hope will release on October 30th. In order to celebrate this announcement, the publisher has also released a new trailer that you can find below.



Please excuse my bad English.

Currently gaming on a PC with an i5-4670k@stock (for now), 16Gb RAM 1600 MHz and a GTX 1070

Steam / Live / NNID : jonxiquet    Add me if you want, but I'm a single player gamer.

JEMC on 08 July 2020

The Wednesday news, part two:

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone's 'OK' gesture has been removed
https://www.pcgamer.com/call-of-duty-modern-warfare-and-warzones-ok-gesture-has-been-removed/
It looks like Infinity Ward has removed the "OK" gesture from Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone. Neither the studio nor Activision has officially confirmed the removal at this point, but its absence was noticed last week by players on Twitter and Reddit.

Rocket League players have scored 29 billion goals
https://www.pcgamer.com/rocket-league-players-have-scored-29-billion-goals/
Rocket League released on July 7, 2015, making it exactly five years old today. The news surprised me, because I feel like I've been playing car soccer for decades now. It's just one of those games that instantly felt timeless.
Still, half of a decade is a pretty long time: According to an infographic made by Psyonix, it was long enough for players to score 29 billion goals.

Bungie removes reward cap from old Destiny raids so players can farm them
https://www.pcgamer.com/bungie-removes-reward-cap-from-old-destiny-raids-so-players-can-farm-them/
You won't find Bungie Day on the calendar, but that doesn't mean it's not a real thing. In fact, it's not just real, it's today, and to celebrate the big event Bungie has removed the reward limit from five of Destiny 2's "featured raids," meaning you can farm them as much as you like—until they're gone.

League of Legends' new champion is a 'magical fawn' jungler named Lillia
https://www.pcgamer.com/league-of-legends-new-champion-is-a-magical-fawn-jungler-named-lillia/
The newest addition to the League of Legends roster has been revealed as the magical fawn Lillia, a "shy, clumsy, and self-conscious" jungler who Riot said is also "the bravest champion we've made."

Hollow Knight: Silksong riddles reveal 4 new NPCs
https://www.pcgamer.com/hollow-knight-silksong-riddles-reveal-4-new-npcs/
The creators behind the excellent Hollow Knight have been slowly revealing new characters through coded riddles for their upcoming sequel Hollow Knight: Silksong. Members of the Hollow Knight Discord have been solving them throughout June and into July, revealing four new characters that players will meet in the game's gloomy world.

Cyberpunk 2077 concept art reveals Westbrook, a playground for the rich
https://www.pcgamer.com/cyberpunk-2077-concept-art-reveals-westbrook-a-playground-for-the-rich/
You won't be able to hang out in the streets of Cyberpunk 2077's Night City until November, but you can still get a taste of the mega-city through some lavish concept art CD Projekt Red has been showing off on Twitter.

Pagan Online is going offline
https://www.pcgamer.com/pagan-online-is-going-offline/
Pagan Online, Wargaming and Mad Head Games' action-RPG, is dropping the online part. It launched last year, but it never managed to tempt many players into its grindy lootfest, and keeping it online has apparently become unsustainable.

Modern Warfare concept art shows off the zombie mode that never was
https://www.pcgamer.com/modern-warfare-concept-art-shows-off-the-zombie-mode-that-never-was/
For Call of Duty: Modern Warfare, Infinity Ward decided to ditch the zombie mode that's cropped up in many of its predecessors. The team was making something a bit more grounded than Black Ops or Infinite War, and apparently shambling corpses just aren't authentic or realistic enough. It looks like the no-zombies rule wasn't settled on straight away, however, and some undead concept art has appeared.



Please excuse my bad English.

Currently gaming on a PC with an i5-4670k@stock (for now), 16Gb RAM 1600 MHz and a GTX 1070

Steam / Live / NNID : jonxiquet    Add me if you want, but I'm a single player gamer.