this is the best game in 10 years .. its beyond awsome im still in chock how good it is. The story and everything... unreal.
Xbox360 and Ps3 owner
I spit in your mouth at nite
I rate it at a 2/10. I've not seen the game, played the game, and only saw 1 screenshot months ago. But it sucks. ;)
Relax chibiis, SOMEONE had to get the ignorant post out of the way today. My buddy got the game yesterday and has become antisocial since LOL However, he was grumbling about something about dying and not having hit save point in an hour and a half.
Riot Of The Blood said:
No, it isn't realistic -- it's flat out bullshit to give this over hyped game a ten. Anything with the slightest bit of hype nowdays gets a high score; it doesn't even matter what the game actually plays like. Reviewers seem to be reviewing hype rather than the game itself. That's why flawed games like GTAIV and Mario Galaxy are getting these stupid scores. |
Have you even played the game?
rocketpig said:
When Two Worlds pulls a 6.8 and Haze pulls a 4.5, you know something is wrong. They're almost the exact same game once you factor in genre. Two Worlds is a shitty Oblivion ripoff that has moments where it's actually fun mixed between massive game faults. Haze is a shitty Halo ripoff that has moments where it's actually fun mixed between massive game faults. For some reason, Two Worlds slipped through with mediocre reviews, just as it deserved. Haze, on the other hand, was given the "Lair Label of Doom" and all reviewers jumped on it for some reason.
|
Nice analogy, but perhaps Two Worlds got a higher score than Haze, because Oblivion is a much better game than Halo 3?
Both games are clones, but Two Worlds is a clone of a 10/10 game, while Haze is a clone of a 8/10 game. =)
Or maybe Two Worlds got a decent score just because they needed more of their Oblivion fix. ^^
I really don't get how this game can get 10 in all subscores and the total score. I've read quite a few other reviews, and most of the reviews are able to point to some serious flaws and shortcomings; such as some of the cutscenes being pompous and straight out boring, levels being linear, multiple install sessions (yes, it even installs between chapters), etc.
If you give this a 10.0 (that's a 100 point scale), you are not setting the standard high enough. Tho I do not think that a game needs to be "perfect" to get a 10.0, it should be free of major annoyances like I just mentioned.
My main problem is the useless 100 point scale anyway, what exactly is the difference between a 94 and a 95 in terms of something tangible?
In Norway the press uses dice in the review of games/movies/cds/concerts etc. It's very simple.
1 sucks beyond belief, 2 is bad, 3 is mediocre, 4 is ok, 5 is great, 6 is amazing.
What other distincton do you need? It's more than enough to make a buying decision, if you bother to read the review as well. This is a 6 point scale, a 10 point scale would be more than enough, 100 points is just silly.
epsilon72 said:
..but..but.....
....need computer upgrade....haven't played original 3....
|
http://www.bestbuy.com/site/olspage.jsp?skuId=8763714&st=essential&type=product&id=1203815241109
$29.99. That's what I bought last Sunday
rocketpig said:
Jesus, you people act as if Eurogamer gave the game a 4/10. The magazine gave it an 8/10. That's a "B", which is fair. Some people like Kojima's style, some don't. |
8/10 is fine, although I'd argue it's a A rather than a B unless alignment of A/B/C/D scoring to out of 10 scoring has changed since I was in school (which it might have as that was over 20 years ago!)
Try to be reasonable... its easier than you think...
@Rocketpig
there is no way Two Worlds could've been worse than HAZE......also in the end we have LOADS of Shooter but few WRPG's////maybe thats why it got a higher score
| ksv said: I really don't get how this game can get 10 in all subscores and the total score. I've read quite a few other reviews, and most of the reviews are able to point to some serious flaws and shortcomings; such as some of the cutscenes being pompous and straight out boring, levels being linear, multiple install sessions (yes, it even installs between chapters), etc. If you give this a 10.0 (that's a 100 point scale), you are not setting the standard high enough. Tho I do not think that a game needs to be "perfect" to get a 10.0, it should be free of major annoyances like I just mentioned. My main problem is the useless 100 point scale anyway, what exactly is the difference between a 94 and a 95 in terms of something tangible? In Norway the press uses dice in the review of games/movies/cds/concerts etc. It's very simple. 1 sucks beyond belief, 2 is bad, 3 is mediocre, 4 is ok, 5 is great, 6 is amazing. What other distincton do you need? It's more than enough to make a buying decision, if you bother to read the review as well. This is a 6 point scale, a 10 point scale would be more than enough, 100 points is just silly. |
play the freaking game before saying anything. This game is epic both graphic wise on the ps3 and the story is mind blowing. Yeah it doe have 2-3 minuttes installs between loads but u know what... u get an ex freaking plosion afterwards of awsome graphics no load times(exepct 3 sec minimal load times) between big changes in the area u are in. Fx the first install(4 min) lasted 4 hours before i had to install 2 more mins of data.... ohh horror how can i possible wait 2 minuttes to be delivered awsome gameplay and graphics... Heck i even watched those 3 min of snakes smoking and the flashing warnings about smoking.
Epic game and i barely even know the mgs story... only played 1 and 3(only one i remember the story in).
Xbox360 and Ps3 owner
I spit in your mouth at nite
About Us |
Terms of Use |
Privacy Policy |
Advertise |
Staff |
Contact
Display As Desktop
Display As Mobile
© 2006-2024 VGChartz Ltd. All rights reserved.
