That sounds like your own insecurity and has nothing to do with me. If I wanted to label you a racist and had just cause for doing so, I wouldnt aprehend myself.

I've been advised to watch this, so I did.

He's actually insane, isn't he?

So you admit you made errant generalizations then. Bingo! End of. 

Lol, I was going to say the same thing but you beat me to it.  I guess we do not need to go any further in this topic.

The thing is, I separate Kanye the person from his music or the genre.  I pretty much do this for any celebrity.  Just because I like what they do for work doesn't mean I want to hear their personal opinion on any particular subject.  

To answer your direct question, I can agree the speech was a rambling mess with some decent nuggets but nothing I would share as anything special.

A lot of the music he produces and things he say prove that he's genius. Also his doctor said his IQ is high so yeah.

I have great respect for Kanye West as a musician. My Beautiful Dark Twisted Fantasy is one of my top 20 favorite albums of all time.

When it comes to political comments though, meh....

I think his speech at the white house was completely incoherent. He throws a good point once in a while, but most of it just doesn't make sense.

I mean you are supposed to vote for a politician based on politics, not because of feelings like 'male energy'. You can use that kind of argument for anything, but it just makes you look stupid, as if you don't actually have a reason to vote for that guy.

Another non-argument he is using is when he is bringing up the multiverse theory to justify why he wants Larry Hoover out of jail, because that makes total sense...

Also 'Make America Great' instead of 'Make America Great Again' because time is a myth???

About gun violence he just says the problem is illegal guns not legal. That at the very least require him to elaborate if he wants that point to be taken seriously, since gun violence can and is clearly happening with legal guns as well.

I am sure he was trying to make a point about the 13th amendment, but what he said made zero sense to me. He didn't make that point clear at all, it was something with buildings not having 13 floors.

He does make a few nice statements though, like bringing jobs back to middle america. And that we need to care about all people, not just black people.

But overall, he is even worse than his idol at constructing arguments. Also I hope he gets his bipolar or sleep deficit issues solved before he runs for president, I guess there is no lower bar for who can get elected, it seems some people here are already happy to vote him in office. One can only hope he reclaims some of his sanity before that.

Where did he admit the "errant" part? 

Well it's such an minute percentage of democrats that I don't think it can even be downplayed. These people certainly exist, but not to a significant degree.

Democrats as a whole are indeed better educated than Republicans, which is where the narrative stems from:

http://www.people-press.org/2015/04/07/a-deep-dive-into-party-affiliation/

Doesn't seem that way to me.

• Fiscal 2009: $1.4 trillion (Obama’s first year and in the teeth of the Recession)
• Fiscal 2010: $1.3 trillion
• Fiscal 2011: $1.3 trillion
• Fiscal 2012: $1.1 trillion
• Fiscal 2013: $680 billion
• Fiscal 2014: $485 billion
• Fiscal 2015: $438 billion
• Fiscal 2016: $587 billion
• Fiscal 2017: $666 billion (Trump’s first year of his Presidency)
• Fiscal 2018: $779 billion (EST)

Plenty of "these people" exist. Which is why dems fight for the those votes.

Im not arguing their voters are not more educated. Based on percentages its not a massive disparity, more women tend to go to college, etc. I go to Starbucks, I see plenty of college educated people working there. I imagine these intellectual elites are generally voting democrat.

I don't respect people simply because they have more formal education, especially with so many people and not really utilizing it. That partly why there is massive debt among college educated people. Unsurprisingly dems are the party entertaining erasing that debt, pandering much?

I'm no expert on the subject but I dont think a president controls all the spending. Trump inherited a government with excessive spending and is trying to reduce the size of government, federal employees, etc. Anywho, I dont expect the excessive spending to be addressed until it has to be regardless if its a democrat or republicans in the white house. One of the biggest criticisms of Trump among republicans is he doesn't push back enough when it comes to expensive budget increases requested by democrats, which leads to government shutdowns and what not. Its not really a debate, democrats campaign on high taxes and increased spending.

Also, why do people keep ignoring the rest of my comment?  I said vote for libertarians if you really care about responsible spending.