Hiku said: So I guess it's upsetting to a number of people that Battlefield V has a woman on the cover.
I guess I shouldn't be surprised. |
I think I've seen two covers, one edition has a man on the front of it....
Hiku said: So I guess it's upsetting to a number of people that Battlefield V has a woman on the cover.
I guess I shouldn't be surprised. |
I think I've seen two covers, one edition has a man on the front of it....
Hiku said: So I guess it's upsetting to a number of people that Battlefield V has a woman on the cover.
I guess I shouldn't be surprised. |
People aren't pissed that their is a women, but that it is probably a result of all of the SJW nonsense.
flashfire926 said: https://kotaku.com/heres-our-first-look-at-battlefield-v-which-goes-back-1826271285 "There won’t be any sort of “premium pass” or season pass in Battlefield V. You won’t have to pay for maps or modes, nor will you be able to buy anything that affects gameplay—as we reported earlier this year, DICE is being cautious after the outrage over last year’s Star Wars Battlefront 2. Shortly after the reveal, EA confirmed to Kotaku that the game will not have any form of randomized loot boxes. Previously, a report had suggested that the next Battlefield would have cosmetic-only loot boxes, but at the time, sources told Kotaku that report was premature and that decisions had not yet been made. “I can confirm that there are no loot boxes,” an EA rep said in an e-mail." Nice to hear. |
Please don't give kotaku clicks.
Mar1217 said:
I mean, if she's from the French Resistance or Soviet Union's side, then there's no problem as far as history accuracy goes. |
She's supposed to be a British fighter, at least that's what they showed in the trailer.
They just want a historically accurate game, there were very few women fighting in WW2. When you put a game showing something like 50% of the soldiers fighting on WW2 were women it clearly upsets people.
Yeah I lost all respect for this game when I saw a partly disabled white british women first thing. That shit didn't happen IRL, it's either she's french resistance, or she doesn't belong in the game. Looks like I can't buy this game if it's going to follow an SJW agenda.
Hiku said:
Oh?
Or finding any excuse they can to complain about female representation, hiding behind "SJW nonsense". |
Well i can't speak for them, but it is a fact that their has been SJW nonsense attacking gaming over the last couple of years.
Ka-pi96 said:
And? I don't care what other people like/want. I'm just saying I'm not interested in a WW2 shooter (and never will be). |
They are cattering FPS fans which at this very moment are kinda tired of modern FPS. If you are not a FPS player then you are not in the list of the target audience anyways.
Eh. The trailer's packed ridiculously full of action, and I'm not exactly a huge fan of that. If it's any indication of the final game, I think I'll pass. I'd play Call of Duty if I wanted stuff like that. That said, I'll reserve final judgement until later.
Another thing I don't exactly like is the amount of female soldiers in the trailer. Perhaps I wasn't perceptive enough, but those didn't seem like forces that were known to have any significant amount of female soldiers. Unrealistic female soldiers are a thing I expect to really kill the immersion for me. I'm not expecting that much immersion from Battlefield anyway, but some things really kill even the remaining immersion. I'm not a huge fan of (sort of) rewriting history just for the sake of inclusiveness...
SJWs only want representation in fiction. I want to know is: if all countries that at this very moment don't force women to enlist, now passed a law forcing all women to go to military the same way men are forced to serve against their will once they hit their legal age for adulthood. Whould they be happy?