John2290 said: This is a bump in poor taste. |
I don't see why. Bumping old predictions that turned out to be way off is standard practice on VGChartz. It serves to remind us all not to be too sure of ourselves.
Back before the Switch released, I predicted it would sell under 20 million lifetime. I freely admit that was an awful prediction and if anyone were to bump that and laugh at my pessimism, you know what, fair enough.
RaptorChrist said: Right, clearly the Switch has not been a failure for Nintendo.
Will the Switch still be doing well in three years, though? That's what I'm curious to find out. I'm not sure if it will have a long lifespan, and if it follows suit with what the Wii did, then sales of it's competitors will overtake the console in the next couple of years. This is why I still think that a hardware upgrade would give the console added life, and I think the way they would need to do it is by allowing developers to tune their games such that both the regular Switch and Switch Pro can play the same games, but with the Switch Pro playing them at a higher resolution or higher whatever. |
I really don't think a more powerful Switch is needed. People aren't buying it for its graphics. All it needs to stay relevant after the release of PS5 and Scarlet is the same thing that kept 3DS relevant after the release of PS4/Xbone and DS relevant after the release of PS3/360; games.
numberwang said:
Ca. 40 million more units to catch that 3DS... it all depends if Nintendo will release a back-compatible Switch 2 in the coming 2 or 3 years.
|
I don't think Switch needs to be replaced before 2023 honestly, it makes no sense to cut it short when its so successful.
Last edited by curl-6 - on 28 August 2019