naruball said:
Barozi said:
You should read much more carefully. In the post I quoted there were three different points why the sales are how they are.
1. marketing 2. price 3. availability
I mentioned marketing and availability. Nowhere did I mention price, so why do you attack me on that?
|
No need to play the victim card. Especially after the tone you displayed with your response to a statement that clearly focused on price and you made it all about marketing and supply.
You should take your own advice and try to read more carefully as well.
|
Jesus Christ. Okay, got another advice for you. Read the thread from beginning to end. Then stop! Take a minute to think. THEN make another post (if you want). Because everything you say about what I said or didn't say is incredibly wrong.
Nowhere did I imply that Sony should've lowered the price, absolutely nowhere. I already accept that price is a big factor for sales. Always have. That's why I "made it all about marketing and supply". Because I accepted the point about price ages ago. No point in discussing that any further.
If it was so "clearly" then why try to diminish the success of Kinect by saying "oh Sony had supply issues" and "oh Microsoft had a far bigger and better marketing push". That's the big fucking irony of the post that I was pointing at.
The two things that Sony really IS accountable for, marketing and supply, are also used as defense why a Sony product is selling so much worse. Again, that's the irony.
Btw. to clarify even more, which I already did in my previous post. These aren't my words. I have no idea about supply issues or how the PSVR was marketed. No opinion about that, because I don't care. I was using that guys own words against him. Nothing more.