By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Nintendo Discussion - Nintendo games: no longer a value in forum dweller eyes

 

The goalposts for judging a console are:

Visual art, music, story,... 67 33.84%
 
Visual art, music, story,... 41 20.71%
 
Cutting-edge graphical power 23 11.62%
 
Just gameplay 38 19.19%
 
Just visual art, music & story 6 3.03%
 
Other 23 11.62%
 
Total:198
padib said:
BeatdownBrigade said:

But it does work that way in the real world of market economics. Its great that you find Nintendo games a better value to you, and its your right as a consumer to target the experience you want. But that does not change the fact the market as a whole has strongly spoke on the fact it prefers more power, access to having 3rd party games besides 1st party games, and robust online options as being more appealing. So seeking niche options is fine and your right, but its not others moving the goal posts at all. Only one moving the goal posts are those defending the value of niche markets as being more valuable than the market has decidely shown.

Games like Mario, Zelda, Pokemon, Animal Crossing are not niche games. We have seen these series capable of selling 25M units and up for one title. With that in mind I invite you to revisit your argument.

Referring to their whole portfolio in comparison to other offers which makes it niche.

Playstation: 105 million
N64: 33 million

Playstation 2: 158 million
Gamecube: 22 million

Playstation 3: 87 million
Wii: 101 million

Playstation 4: 50 million
Wii U: 14 million

Just an example of sales history since Sony and Nintendo have been in direct competition. Overall the market has undoubtedly spoken to its desire for more than just Nintendo games being offered to a system. Sure things like a 3D Mario, Smash, and Mario Kart push a lot of units, but a lot of franchises are over-hyped due to nostalgia and name recognition. Zelda is one such example. The best sellin Zelda is Twilight Princess that sold 8.6 million copies being on two systems the gamecube and Wii in its lifetime 11 years ago. Uncharted 4 sold 8.8 million in 7 months. Uncharted 3 came out around the same time as Skyward sword. Skyward sword on a console with 100m install base sold 3.67 million all-time. Uncharted 3 sold more than that on DAY 1. In a single day on a console that had just over half that install base and its sold 6.8 million all-time. Most Zelda games have only sold 3-4 million copies. Which is respectable, but thats nothing compared to many franchises. Call of Duty does in one day or in one weekend what the cast majority of Nintendo titles do in their lifetime. Thats the part Nintendo as a company and its fans fall to grasp. Most people don't care about most of their franchises more than a lot of franchises that are new today.



Around the Network

The same argument can be made for the ps4 and X1. E.g. The ps4 is a:

1) home console
2) DVD player
3) BR player
4) a Cable box (for those who use Vue)

The reality is that neither the X1, PS4 or the Switch do everything fully, there are compromises. The Switch makes compromises by having last gen specs for being a home console and not coming with a Pro controller for those who prefer traditional controllers (lack of a proper D button on joy cons).

The PS4 makes compromises by not having a BR / DVD remote and having to use a DS4 instead. The issue of not being able to play as many formats of video as many DVD and BR players.

When it comes to consoles, many gamers value the console on its specs. E.g. I won't pay £300 for a Sega Mega Drive anything it has some awesome games. The specs of that console aren't worth £300 nor is the hardware.

Different people will see different reasons to see value or less value for each console. I made a mistake buying the Vita as I realised I don't really game on the go and I prefer home consoles miles above handheld. I would have much rather had the option of getting a switch bundle without the joycons but with a Pro controller. I'm not interested in the waggle games so it would be at no loss. For the sake of the duality, Ninty has had to make compromises even Nintendo fans must come to terms that you will no longer get handheld priced games. Just because it's both, you will no longer 2 variations of games that could hugely differ as one was built from ground up to be played on the go.

I'm not saying these are negative points. I'm a huge fan of the docking concept as I'm always moving my ps4 from room to room, but I understand different gamers will have different genuine reasons to value each one of the consoles and just because a machine does more than one thing, that don't necessarily justify a high price.



padib said:

ONE: You get Nintendo's games

Let's be honest, the first two years are going to be sparse for releases.

TWO: You get 3rd party japanese games that are portable style and that cater to people who buy Nintendo's portables.

Name some coming to the switch that anyone actually cares about.

THREE: You get a portable system. The PS4 doesn't offer that.

And yet, I played The Last Guardian via a PSvita only yesterday..

there you go.

 

Fact of the matter is:

* It's underpowered compared to todays consoles, significantly so.
* It's expensive, especially given the fact it's underpowered.
* Portability takes a hit in the fact that the battery life sucks compared to similar priced tablets on the market, despite the unit being twice to three times as thick as said other tablets.
* Launch lineup is absolutely shocking.
* You now have to pay for online play, with very little incentive beyond free nes games that you only get to keep for one month, and for many services you need to link a cellphone running the switch app to even use them.
* On the much lauded portability front, it's too big and too thick to fit anywhere but the slackest of large pocketed jeans and someones bag/backpack, gone are the days of a little true-portable slipping into your pocket, I don't consider tablets to be true portables, cell phones, DS, non-XL 3ds and to a stretch the original psp and at a very big stretch, the vita, are, but tablets.. have the same portability factor as a laptop.

It's a rough launch, everyone knows it, it's just the diehards trying to smooth over it with excuses.



people buy nintendo consoles for games? so why do they buy microsoft and sony consoles? as paper weights?

dn't mind the fact that the games libraries for ps4 and xbox at launch will be significantly larger than the library for the switch and it will stay that way



You need create room for discussion first. You DON'T do that by having one side say: "I only buy Nintendo games, so PS4 has 0 value" and the other side saying: "I only buy Sony games, so Switch has 0 value".

Of course value is a purely subjective matter but at least TRY to compare them.
Price, games (ALL of them), technical capabilities, additional features (achievements, motion controls), online service, multiplayer userbase, continuous support, etc.

The only REAL advantage for Switch that I see is that Switch is portable.
That it has Nintendo games is a) obvious and b) not really a strong point, because if it hadn't, there wouldn't be many games left. Meaning other consoles also have very strong games that aren't on Switch. So it's basically a tie.



Around the Network

I've realized more and more over my decade plus of (on and off) forum dwelling and most of us forum dwellers hold a very minority view of gaming that is often out of touch and nowhere near represents the view of the gaming community at large, and even smaller in comparison to the masses in gneral, so I wouldn't put much stock in what we say..

I remember in my years here and back at Gamepro (ugh), Wii was litterally the devil in the eyes of many. It was horrible, it was doomed, it was killing gaming, it was only made for "casuals" and simpletons, etc etc.. Meanwhile it went on to sell 100 million units, had a robust library, brought massive profits for Nintendo, and provided some of the most fun and memorable gaming experiences to date. 



 

"We hold these truths to be self-evident - all men and women created by the, go-you know.. you know the thing!" - Joe Biden

padib said:
Ruler said:

Yeah but the PS4 has Sony games so what is your point?

The 3DS launched at 250$ and even that was overpriced to many hence why they doped the price very early.
If this is a handheld and console hybrid why is it priced like a current gen console? Thats the main issue for many people. 

My point is that Nintendo games are the value of a Nintendo system. You can't say Sony's PS4 is the same price and it has Sony games therefore it is a better value. The types of games are so vastly different, their pedigree so different.

It's like as if you bundle all the movies made by one actor, say Leonardo Dicaprio, and all the movies by Steve Carell and say "Hey, they're the same price but Leo has more movies so it's a better value to buy his bundle."

It doesn't work that way.

An established library and power add value to a console just like the hybrid concept adds value to the Switch. How much value depends on your own preference. To me the PS4 (pro) offers more value than the Switch. 



Please excuse my (probally) poor grammar

The goalposts for a console are just how good the games are. Nothing else matters imo.



padib said:
BeatdownBrigade said:

Referring to their whole portfolio in comparison to other offers which makes it niche.

Playstation: 105 million
N64: 33 million

Playstation 2: 158 million
Gamecube: 22 million

Playstation 3: 87 million
Wii: 101 million

Playstation 4: 50 million
Wii U: 14 million

Just an example of sales history since Sony and Nintendo have been in direct competition. Overall the market has undoubtedly spoken to its desire for more than just Nintendo games being offered to a system. Sure things like a 3D Mario, Smash, and Mario Kart push a lot of units, but a lot of franchises are over-hyped due to nostalgia and name recognition. Zelda is one such example. The best sellin Zelda is Twilight Princess that sold 8.6 million copies being on two systems the gamecube and Wii in its lifetime 11 years ago. Uncharted 4 sold 8.8 million in 7 months. Uncharted 3 came out around the same time as Skyward sword. Skyward sword on a console with 100m install base sold 3.67 million all-time. Uncharted 3 sold more than that on DAY 1. In a single day on a console that had just over half that install base and its sold 6.8 million all-time. Most Zelda games have only sold 3-4 million copies. Which is respectable, but thats nothing compared to many franchises. Call of Duty does in one day or in one weekend what the cast majority of Nintendo titles do in their lifetime. Thats the part Nintendo as a company and its fans fall to grasp. Most people don't care about most of their franchises more than a lot of franchises that are new today.

Is this a fair comparison? Do you really believe you can compare that way? The market has shown overwhelming support for Nintendo even during its worst years. But if we compare it your way, it doesn't show the true reality of things, but your reality: the reality where all that matters are home console sales. Yet that doesn't reflect the market and its position towards Nintendo.

Here is the updated report (note that it starts before the existence of playstation, in contrast with your table) based on vgchartz numbers:

Gen Results
3

Home:     61.91M NES   vs       0          PS
Mobile:           0     Nin    vs       0         PS
Total:        61.91M Nin   vs       0          PS
Wins:                  1  Nin   vs       0          Sony

4 Home:     49.10M SNES vs       0          PS
Mobile:           0     Nin   vs        0         PS
Total:       49.10M Nin   vs        0          PS
Wins:                  2  Nin   vs       0          Sony
5

Home:    32.93M N64   vs  104.25M PS1
Mobile:  118.7M GB     vs       0          PS
Total:    147.37M Nin    vs   104.25M PS
Wins:                  3  Nin   vs      0          Sony

6 Home:    21.74M GCN  vs  157.68M PS2
Mobile:  81.51M GBA   vs       0           PS
Total:    103.25M Nin   vs   157.68M  PS
Wins:                  3 Nin   vs       1           Sony
7 Home:  101.18M Wii   vs   86.71M   PS3
Mobile:154.88M DS     vs   80.82M   PSP
Total:    256.06M Nin   vs 167.53M    PS
Wins:                  4 Nin   vs      1           Sony
8 Home:    13.67M WiiU vs   48.96M   PS4
Mobile:  61.98M 3DS   vs   14.73M   PSV
Total:      75.65M Nin    vs   63.69M    PS
Wins:                  5 Nin   vs      1           Sony
9 Probably:           6 Nin   vs      1           Sony

@BraLoD: The market highly disagrees with you.

I love how you include gen 3 and 4 and combine Homeconsoles and Handheld like they are the same thing. You should also look at Software since the PS4 software sales already outsold the 3DS and Wii U sales combined.



Please excuse my (probally) poor grammar

Teeqoz said:
Of course it is a value in anyone's eyes. Nintendo games are great. However as has been proven in the past, having Nintendo 1st party games and "Nintendo-like 3rd party" alone isn't going to get people to buy your console in droves.

Your right. Having a mainline pokemon in your system is what going to get people to buy your console.  Eurogamer's Pokemom Stars better be true and how its coming this year! 



Pocky Lover Boy!