By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Sony Discussion - BREAKING NEWS! New VIDEO Footage! The Order Sequel?

Teeqoz on 25 February 2015
Acevil said:
Teeqoz said:
The Sydney one looks so good. I hope we get some openworld game in a setting like that sometime.


Assassin Creed will try to be like this without the TESLA part? So you might get a sandbox based in Industrial London. Assuming they don't mess it up. 


But I said Sydney...



Around the Network
Proxy-Pie on 25 February 2015
Rafie said:
MohammadBadir said:

It's rather obvious that I didn't, but I've heard enough about it to know that it's not a good game. Rather, it's just another graphically intensive game that doesn't really shine that much anywhere else.


No it's not obvious. Also, why are you going by word of mouf from reviewers and such instead of making your own judgement? The game is actually good. Although reviewers do have valid points about the game's flaws, they were also a bit too critical of such attributes that may not be a negative to others (QTE's, MP's, etc) I'm not criticizing you about you not liking the game. Just curious as to why you don't think it's a "good" game. There are plenty of good games that has bad sequels too. I'm sure you know that though.

I don't let reviewers dictate what I do and do not play, but unless it's the underrated gem of the century, a Metacritic score of 66 points to it being a bad game.

Maybe it's not a completely bad game, but it's not worth 60$. 7 hours of linear single player gameplay just isn't worth that much in this day and age.



Acevil on 25 February 2015
Teeqoz said:
Acevil said:


Assassin Creed will try to be like this without the TESLA part? So you might get a sandbox based in Industrial London. Assuming they don't mess it up. 


But I said Sydney...


Oh specifically Sydney.....ya sadly I doubt it. I cannot even think of a game with sydney even as a setting (not open world).



 

the_real_dsister44 on 25 February 2015

Breaking News! Developers post concept arts on their facebook.



Dallinor on 25 February 2015
mtachi said:
So... The Order 1887? The Order 1886 2? The Order 1886: The Sequel? Is there any way that the sequel's name is gonna be good?


It would probably be The Order: [insert any year they want to set it].

As a result of having such a unique title and basically an immortal cast of characters, they can avoid just adding a single digits to the sequels.

A change of scenery and a new year would be all that's needed.



 

Around the Network
FrozenXIV on 25 February 2015

I remember seeing somewhere that the order was going to be a trilogy



    PS4 Game Collection

           

                                            

0815user on 25 February 2015

awesome sauce if true



GribbleGrunger on 25 February 2015

I've now read thousands of comments and views and watched the whole game played though twice, so it's now very interesting reading comments in The Order thread to see how many people are still latching on to complete misconceptions.



 

The PS5 Exists. 


Kowan on 25 February 2015
MohammadBadir said:
Rafie said:


Have you even played the game? Judging by your "plenty of GOOD games" comment, you didn't like the game.

It's rather obvious that I didn't, but I've heard enough about it to know that it's not a good game. Rather, it's just another graphically intensive game that doesn't really shine that much anywhere else.


It's unfair and not exactly right to judge a game when you haven't played it yourself. Those scores are the opinions of other people and not yours. Are all the scores tallied by Metacritic bad ones? No, they are numerous good reviews about the game too.

It's like saying the best games are the only ones that sell well. If it flopped, that means it's a horrible game.



Rafie on 25 February 2015
MohammadBadir said:
Rafie said:


No it's not obvious. Also, why are you going by word of mouf from reviewers and such instead of making your own judgement? The game is actually good. Although reviewers do have valid points about the game's flaws, they were also a bit too critical of such attributes that may not be a negative to others (QTE's, MP's, etc) I'm not criticizing you about you not liking the game. Just curious as to why you don't think it's a "good" game. There are plenty of good games that has bad sequels too. I'm sure you know that though.

I don't let reviewers dictate what I do and do not play, but unless it's the underrated gem of the century, a Metacritic score of 66 points to it being a bad game.

Maybe it's not a completely bad game, but it's not worth 60$. 7 hours of linear single player gameplay just isn't worth that much in this day and age.


I mentioned the reviewers because you said that you heard enough about the game to know that it's not good. That's all. I'm glad that you don't let people or interviewer's skew your judgement on certain games. As many people hated on Ryse, it was still a good game. The hate for it was crazy. Also Metacritic is becoming so messed up that I'm not certain anymore if it's good to mention them when judging games.

 

Anyhow, I can agree that this was more like a 40 dollar purchase rather than 60. Thanks for keeping it civil man. I respect your opinion.



PSN ID- RayCrocheron82

XBL Gamertag- RAFIE82

NNID- RAFIE82/ Friend Code: SW-6006-2580-8237

YouTube- Rafie Crocheron