Rafie said:
MohammadBadir said:
It's rather obvious that I didn't, but I've heard enough about it to know that it's not a good game. Rather, it's just another graphically intensive game that doesn't really shine that much anywhere else.
|
No it's not obvious. Also, why are you going by word of mouf from reviewers and such instead of making your own judgement? The game is actually good. Although reviewers do have valid points about the game's flaws, they were also a bit too critical of such attributes that may not be a negative to others (QTE's, MP's, etc) I'm not criticizing you about you not liking the game. Just curious as to why you don't think it's a "good" game. There are plenty of good games that has bad sequels too. I'm sure you know that though.
|
I don't let reviewers dictate what I do and do not play, but unless it's the underrated gem of the century, a Metacritic score of 66 points to it being a bad game.
Maybe it's not a completely bad game, but it's not worth 60$. 7 hours of linear single player gameplay just isn't worth that much in this day and age.