GamechaserBE said:
Yeah it is fun but played it few years ago already on pc =p |
I didnt own a PC a few years ago =P
Seriously my family had a PC when I was like 6-8 and then I didnt get my laptop until this year
| Shortiloe said: PS3 already had A LOT of great AAA Games with PS+, don't see your problem here. Tomb Raider, Bulletpoint and much more. |
That is because I am not talking about the past
|
|
 |
 |
  |
I don't play multiplayer and own only PS4, so I never bothered renewing when it ran out because it was not worth my money.
Free games are not free, now that they are two per month they come out to about $2 per game...
Nit much, but considering I don't care for most of them, to the point that I wouldn't buy them now if they cost $2, it comes out to much much more...
In the end, I have to hope I like 5 of those games per year, which comes out to $10 per game, and most of them cost that much...
So I can just save mh money and buy games I'm interested in, instead of paying in advance for a cat in a sack...
The earliest I see myself subscribing again is Tom Clancy's The Division, but I fear that it is still years away, and that it will disappoint like Destiny...
| CDiablo said: The more subscribers, the worse the games will get. Sony could afford to bring people in with loss leaders on the original PS+ but once it became mandatory for online the losses are likely too big to consistently give out retail games. I wouldnt expect any top tier game other than Sony ones(Knack and KZ will be free soon enough). Keep in mind the service WAS once free games+discounts. Now the service is the ability to play online with bonuses of free games+discounts. |
makes sense to me...
Still, to soon for me to start feeling nolgastic about the good old days of ps+...
|
|
|
|
|
Also how more subscribers how more expensive it will be for sony to give free games..
Resogun
Contrast
Dont Starve
Outlast
Dead Nation
Mercenary Kings
Stick it to the man
Towerfall
Trine 2
Fez
Velocity
Dust
Spelunky
Binding of issac
all for 50$ and thats not including vita games and PS3, how much do you expect honestly
Not surprised.
On the PS3, they needed to intice you buy PS+, on the PS4 you NEED PS+ to play online so your kind of forced to buy it.
| Wii_R2_Hardcore said: Does anybody else feels the same way? |
Not at all.
There have been so many great games offered for free, or discounted through PS+ to make it more than worth it. I would say about half of the games I've played on Vita have been free from PS+.
my issue with alot of gamers is that a game has to bee aaa with amazing graphics to be worthy of playing
honestly indies are games to and can be just as fantastic in gameplay and fun
grateful to ps+ for making me expand my taste
| GamechaserBE said: Also how more subscribers how more expensive it will be for sony to give free games.. |
This doesn't makes sense. The deals would be done based on downloads, not just a set fee. Many developers might be happy to let the games go onto PS+ as retail sales might have all but dried up and used might also be hurting their income. So Sony offer them a certain amount per download, not everyone will download it, but a lot will, it gains some extra income for this developer and then potential of added sales from DLC (if any) from potential games that have already made a profit.
Hmm, pie.
About Us |
Terms of Use |
Privacy Policy |
Advertise |
Staff |
Contact
Display As Desktop
Display As Mobile
© 2006-2024 VGChartz Ltd. All rights reserved.
