Dude, half of your post references a site specifically created to prove something that is considered fiction in the world of science. You are in no position to be criticizing Wikipedia.

Wikipedia has far better, much more scientific sources, that article included. 

The issue here is that we have no idea where most these stones came from, we can't date them, we can't even confirm their origin. 

These things are CRITICAL in archeology. Archeology requires context in order to be beneficial scientifically. Without that context, these are just stones that science can't take seriously.

And it doesn't, because these stones have no context, and there is nothing else in South American archeology that DOES have context that at all supports these stones.

Keeo in mind, these stones aren't just being used by creationists, they are also being used by ancient astronaut theorists. That's not particularly good company.

So then where are the dinos now

Apparently you haven't done your homework.

The stones have been tested multiple times.

The National University of Engineering of Peru. The tests’ conclusions lead unmistakably to the conclusion that the stones were indeed of Pre-Hispanic origin.

Joseph F. Blumrich, a NASA scientists,ran lab tests on it and said they were authentic.

Tests have also been done by Ryan Drum, an Biologist who said the stones weren't done in our time. Tests were reportedly done other times as well.

What do you mean there is no context?
There are Moche vases in Peruvian museums dating from 70 A.D. to 900 A.D. with dinosaurs on them. There are also azcan textile depicting figures that are dated hundreds of years old.


In the Larco Herrera Museum in Peru there are vases that clearly depict dinosaurs. Some of these same types of dinosaurs are shown on the Ica stones.

Around Acambaro, Mexico, over 33,000 ceramic figurines were found in the area and identified with the Pre-classical Chupicuaro Culture and some of them were dinosaurs. And they were discovered in the 1940s long before the west's fascination with and mass exposure to dinosaurs.

There have been artifacts from Tiwanaku in Bolivia that look like dinosaurs.

The native American Coclé culture of Panama, which existed hundreds of years ago ,there was discovered a pottery of a pterodactyle according to A. Hyatt Verrill.
And there are many more "anomalous" artifacts in central and south america like these that you won't find in your history or science textbooks. These findings contradict the evolution story they have been indoctrinating the masses with so I doubt things will change.

If you want to base your beliefs on a bunch of "scientists" worldview without critically analysing and challenging it then that's on you. But please do some actual homework instead of making ill informed posts. And that goes for everybody else.

prolly hunted to extinction by humans and turned into food as usual.

nah, I think we are dinosaurs and humans went extinct

the dinosaur and humans living together time is probably before Noah's ark and Noah obviously was advised not to take any dinosaurs on board, becaus they(we) are evil, yet some of our species managed to get on the ark, eat the humans and pose as them

I think if you ever see a "human" embryo you will agree with my theory

Complete and utter bullshit.

Don't you even realise that people can actually check your nonsense by going to the museum and SEE the pottery (which in the Moche's case is mostly erotic in nature). You can actually ask archeologists what your "dinosaurs" really are if you cared. But you just don't want to learn...

Good alternative theory my man! Always good to see people with the ability to think themselves:)

Did you know that there are tiny little men living in our bodies that make the world go round? There's tons of evidence to prove it.
SOURCE: Spongebob Squarepants Season 3 Episode 1: Mermaid Man and Barnacle Boy IV

Funny how he uses dating methods only when they support his theories.

I mean I guess that whole fossilization process just doesn't mean anything at all, right? And it's all just a global conspiracy theory to uphold Darwin and Wallace's theories....to say nothing of the thousands of people before them that also proposed evolutionary concepts. Many going all the way back to the ancient Greeks, Romans and Chinese.

I dont understand...you critizise the op when he uses the term evolutionist in  a bad way. And immediately call him into question.

But if he was mocking the religious then its fine?

Thats one seriously messed up post Runa. I respect you for your reviews and gaming posts but this is messed up.

I mean i get the whole thing where evolution is proven and religion is hogwash...but i mean come on? Most religious people reading your post are decent people and are simply following a way of live prescribed through scripture. Why is it okay for them to be mocked? 

If i misread your post then sorry but i dont think i did? (ie. the first paragraph could be completely unrelated to the second).