riderz13371 said:
man-bear-pig said: OT: No business is 'moral', unless being moral equates to higher profits (like Innocent smoothies or something). What Microsoft are doing is what EVERY BUSINESS would do - make WONGA! |
Yes I completely understand that but you have to remember this isn't 2005. Sony and Nintendo are arguably on par with Xbox when it comes to console features and social experiences and they are both offering it for free.
|
and now? if they ask for 500 dollars per month it's their good right, just because others have other strategies to make a profit with their consoles doesn't mean microsoft has to have the same strategy and like we saw this gen with ps3 and 360, you have to do something to make profit over the years with those machines, it's not enough to hope to sell enough games if you sell your console for a huge loss the first years. nintendo has the strategy to make profit with a console which is sold for only a very small loss and then for profit after maybe a year, microsofts is to make profit with live, royalties and whatever and sony's is also little bit different.
so i could also complain that nintendo isn't selling the console for a huge loss because both others do it and because of that it's unfair that they don't do it.
every company can have the startegy they think is the best for them, if you like it or not. as long as nobody forces you to buy a 360 and pay for live everything should be fine...
and why a new thread for that? it's not as if exactly what you said isn't already in hundred other threads about live where you could just make a comment.