By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - PC - (Video) case you are wondering, this is what Skyrim looks like on PC in Max Settings

!!!!!!!!!!WATCH IN 1080P!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

i think screenshots don't do the game justice really, its because there is a lot of animations going on, especially at the last part of the video you can see how beautiful the snow and water looks like.

 

one of the reasons i've did this is because some people say that it looks crap on PC because its a console port or what not so there is no difference. most of the screenshots i've seen focused on the outside vista view, you can't really see the details of stuff that is 50 kilometers from you right?

here is a typical Skyrim Screenshot that everyone likes to take

seriously you can't see any difference when you want to see stuff that is far like this xD , oh and videos >>>>> Screenshots, even though Youtube opress videos like it was the us Marshall and his three daughters (i bet no one will get this joke) , and also lower the FPS to 30 i think ?



Around the Network

Looks great. I'm more than pleased with how the game looks on High settings though.



forest-spirit said:
Looks great. I'm more than pleased with how the game looks on High settings though.


i think the difference between high and ultra is just some fire and water effects, i could be wrong though.

edit: and i also noticed that on the console versions that last area doesn't have snow for some reason , its just a brown bridge with no snow falling down.



Can't see much of a difference.



I'm just happy thanks to consoles I can play it on "High".

Can't comment on the highest end settings, but I can say that thanks to consoles crappy graphical ability there probably was much more focus on performance for those of us with PC's that are 3-4 years old.

Which is why the "You have to upgrade your PC every year" argument makes me laugh.



Around the Network

not much of a difference anyway, but water really seems so real!!



don't mind my username, that was more than 10 years ago, I'm a different person now, amazing how people change ^_^

Kasz216 said:
I'm just happy thanks to consoles I can play it on "High".

Can't comment on the highest end settings, but I can say that thanks to consoles crappy graphical ability there probably was much more focus on performance for those of us with PC's that are 3-4 years old.

Which is why the "You have to upgrade your PC every year" argument makes me laugh.

''Consoles crappy graphical ability''?

That's just trolling..



I am satisfied with PS3 graphics playing on my 55" TV I I am just concern about the lag as soon I reached 8mb saved file.



Boutros said:
Kasz216 said:
I'm just happy thanks to consoles I can play it on "High".

Can't comment on the highest end settings, but I can say that thanks to consoles crappy graphical ability there probably was much more focus on performance for those of us with PC's that are 3-4 years old.

Which is why the "You have to upgrade your PC every year" argument makes me laugh.

''Consoles crappy graphical ability''?

That's just trolling..

I am fairly sure that you can objectively count the polygons and resolutions of textures as well as distance downgrading to show that consoles have a crappy graphical ability.



Tag(thx fkusumot) - "Yet again I completely fail to see your point..."

HD vs Wii, PC vs HD: http://www.vgchartz.com/forum/thread.php?id=93374

Why Regenerating Health is a crap game mechanic: http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=3986420

gamrReview's broken review scores: http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=4170835

 

Boutros said:
Can't see much of a difference.


it goes without saying that... You should watch it on 1080P