Quantcast
gamrConnect - FloatingWaffles's Wall
FloatingWaffles

    8,722

    L5: Zergling (1,278 until level 6)
    < FloatingWaffles I am VERY intrigued by Google's new Stadia platform, looking forward to when they reveal more during
    • A 21 year old male gamer
    • United States
    • Joined on January 22nd 2015, last online 1 hour ago.
    • Profile Views: 6,650
    • Forum posts: 1,985 times which averages 1 posts per day
    •   VG$ 998.80

    Badges: (view all)

    Quite a Comeback Enter your first Prediction League event.
    Congratulations on Pressing Start! Score your first game in your collection.
    One Piece at a Time Add your first game to your collection.
    Breaking Out Managed to avoid being banned for 1 year.
    A Free Man Managed to avoid being banned for 2 years.
    Ride Into the Sunset Managed to avoid being banned for 3 months.
    Vice Free Managed to avoid being banned for 6 months.
    Escape Artist Managed to avoid being banned for 1 month.
    A Badge Within A Badge Earned 20 badges.
    4 Years Has been a VGChartz member for over 4 years.
    Freezing Logged in on Christmas day.
    Haunted Logged in on Halloween.
    Pata 100 wall post comments made on gamrConnect.
    Hit And Run 15 comments posted on VGChartz news articles.

    FloatingWaffles's Wall

    < 1 - 20 of 25 <
    < FloatingWaffles updated his status:

    I am VERY intrigued by Google's new Stadia platform, looking forward to when they reveal more during the summer and what exclusives/first party stuff it might have.

    < AngryLittleAlchemist posted something on FloatingWaffles's wall:

    Missed you bruh. Be more active!

    Yoooooo, been a while my guy lol. I've still been here but yeah just not as active as much. I'll try!

    on 02 February 2019

    < axumblade posted something on FloatingWaffles's wall:

    I am cowering over the power move of having the Shaggy avatar. Please don't hurt me D:

    just don't, like, get on my bad side man ;)

    on 01 February 2019

    < FloatingWaffles updated his status:

    I offer my full support to shaggy getting into MK11

    < FloatingWaffles updated his status:

    E3 HYPE, we’re so close!

    It's already winter now :(

    on 14 December 2018

    Indeed lol, i've been needing to change this for a while

    on 14 December 2018

    < FloatingWaffles updated his status:

    I'm still excited to eventually play Sea of Thieves, it's just dissapointing to hear it apparently doesn't have much content at the moment considering it's been in development for years. Really hope it's a success for Rare and Microsoft, the foundation that's there looks great to add more to and build upon over time.

    < FloatingWaffles updated his status:

    Bionic Commando from 2009 is such an underrated game. I'm just replaying it on PC after last playing it in 2009-2010 and it's still so great even after all this time.

    Tell me more. I've heard it's a underrated gem.

    on 24 April 2018

    It's definitely underrated imo, I loved it, sadly it didn't sell well when it originally launched. The gameplay with the swinging is still really fun, so was the multiplayer when it was active, only way to play it now on PC at least is through LAN though. Soundtrack is fantastic too, specifically tracks like "The Gauntlet".

    It's available for cheap nowadays with it being only $10 on Steam so I would recommend it to anyone to at least give it a try, especially for that price. Or just look at some videos of it and decide if it's the type of thing you might be interested in trying.

    on 24 April 2018

    Ok. Thanks! Also, I don't know why I got 4 notifications for this one reply. LOL

    on 24 April 2018

    it was because of how it doesn't let you edit your own wall comments after posting them and I kept remembering stuff to mention in my response so I had to keep deleting it then reposting it lol :P

    on 24 April 2018

    < AngryLittleAlchemist posted something on FloatingWaffles's wall:

    Are you gonna get a Switch?

    Yeah I will eventually for sure, just waiting on more games that I would want to be released first like Super Mario Odyssey. I could have pre-ordered back when the pre-orders were open but I decided not to lol.

    on 17 July 2017

    Lol! What is your most hyped 2018 and beyond Switch game?

    on 18 July 2017

    I'm not sure since there aren't many known 2018 Switch games so far lol, or at least i'm not sure if there are? I know there's Kirby, Yoshi, and Metroid Prime 4. I don't really care much for those honestly until I see more gameplay of them to see if those are games I would be interested in. I would say Super Mario Odyssey still though in terms of what's coming in the future even though it's not 2018 lol. What about you?

    on 18 July 2017

    Well we have Kirby, Yoshi, Fire Emblem, Pokemon(most likely delayed though tbh) and Metroid Prime coming out next year. Hm...I'd have to say either Prime or Fire Emblem! I'm not a Yoshi or Kirby guy, never played them, but I kind of hope the next Kirby and Yoshi releases evolve a lot more, kind of like BOTW and Odyssey. I think Nintendo needs to keep evolving, so i'm not really hyped for those games cause they look kind of standard.

    on 19 July 2017

    < BraLoD posted something on FloatingWaffles's wall:

    Which goalpost I ever moved?
    You should try to learn to read or think, before writting back to people.

    "Before writing back to people", lmao you're the one who came to my profile to respond over a thread that was locked then reopened.

    Also, you said in your thread that the above "reasons" that you think Nintendo should go 3rd party are:
    -people won't be tied to their specific hardware
    -you'll have access to their games and other games
    - they'll have better hardware to work with
    -the games will have a bigger reach

    ALL of which are applicable to Sony if someone wanted to argue why they should go 3rd party. (And every other company).
    - not tied to Sony hardware
    - access to Sony games and other games
    - better hardware to work with if they were to work on PC
    - the games will have a bigger reach

    Yet when someone else makes a thread using the EXACT SAME points you made for Nintendo but about Sony instead, THEN you wanna try to say it's not the same thing? Nah, it doesn't work that way.

    How about try to be open minded next time instead of being biased, because that's all it looks like you are right now.

    And you are moving goalposts by claiming those are the reasons that you think Nintendo should go 3rd party for, ALL of which apply to Sony and every other company too, but all of a sudden say that the reasons YOU YOURSELF said don't apply to Sony for some reason all of a sudden even though they do.

    And you can't complain either when you came to my profile to try to tell me to "read or think" about something in a thread that was originally locked. I guess you wanted to keep it going though.

    on 18 April 2017

    Stop with this "lmao" dismissing, that doesn't give ay weight to any point you are trying to make.

    I never moved any goalposts, my thread was about Nintendo, Anfebious thread was about Sony, they both are not the same thing, what I said to Nintendo doesn't apply to Sony, and would apply to Microsoft, or Apple, or any other company, no matter how much you want to push it, that is what doesn't work this way.

    Rol asked me why, I answered him, not "for some reason", I gave him a reasoning to why, which you sound like you didn't even read, because you want to label me as a biased, instead of trying to understand where I'm coming from, on both situations, different situations, and try to make fun of me, which is very childish, really, very childish.

    My reasons on the thread I made are all still the same, what I answered to Rol as well, and the only connection between any of that, which would be gamers being able to play all games anywhere, which is and ideal to gaming not a specific company analysis, I made the same on both threads, be it Nintendo or Sony, that would be the ideal case.

    It's okay to disagree with me, my reasoning or the points I made, but try to actually understand what is going on before, if you come to "lmao" me because that's all you want the biased here is not me.

    Feel free to come back to my thread and read every single answer I gave to people actually asking me about the specific matter, then go to Anfebious thread and try to find any contradiction with it.

    I think those reasons Apply to Nintendo (that's why I made a thread about Nintendo), I don't think the reasons I gave about Nintendo products, business practises, market reach, potential of sales growth by IP, or any of the points I made have anything to do with Sony products, business practises, market reach and potential of sales growth by IP.

    on 18 April 2017

    I'm not writing "lmao" to dismiss anything. I don't even know how that would dismiss anything to you.

    I did read your reply to Rol in the original thread before it got locked and that still doesn't change anything. The above reasons you said why Nintendo should go 3rd party DO work for every other company and yes that does include Sony. Feel free to try tell me how it doesn't somehow, but it does. Would Sony going 3rd party mean not being tied to their hardware? Yes. Would people have access to Sony games and other games? Yes. Would they have better hardware to make games for? Yes. Would the games have a bigger reach? Yes.

    For you to say that those above reasons work for Nintendo, but then when someone uses your same reasons but for Sony instead, which perfectly works as well, for you to just then try to dismiss it only makes you look hypocritical and biased. And it is moving goalposts.

    I'm not even saying I want any of the big 3 to go 3rd party, i'm just pointing out how hypocritical and how biased it looks for you to use those reasons for Nintendo, your reasons you made up which work for Sony and other companies too, but then try to say it doesn't work for Sony all of a sudden.

    So you can't say that I "didn't try to look at where you were coming from" or that I insulted you because that's not what happened. I said based on the way you were acting in that thread you are LOOKING like you are being biased. I like to give people the benefit of the doubt, all i'm pointing out is that is what it looks like.

    Plus you were the one who came onto my profile to tell me to "try to learn to read or think", basically insinuating that i'm dumb. So don't try to tell me that I insulted you or was being childish, which I didn't, when apparently you're no better then according to that.

    on 19 April 2017

    I came to your wall because the thread was locked, and I only treated you back the way you did me, you was rude out of the blue, that's how I got you back.
    About how it's not hypocritical, as you read what I wrote back to Rol, I stated why for Sony business model and as a company, those points I mentioned for Nintendo are not benefitical.
    The problem is not that I said they wouldn't exist for Sony, but that the effect of it would be wildly different.
    Those points where based on Nintendo as a company being able to move to a better position based on the strentgh of their first party games and how could be benefit from making better use of it by opening them to other system, meanwhile Sony has PlayStation as the core of a vein of services where they benefit a lot from and already solid stablished install bases and global reach with it, and opening up wouldn't benefit them nearly the same, and the effect of such move wouldn't be benefitical to the market just as well because of it.
    That's a huge difference and why for Sony those wouldn't work out.

    on 19 April 2017

    I'm not being rude, i'm just pointing out things as I see it. If it seems that way to you then oh well. Seeing as how it seems we're not going to agree on this subject and we're just gonna go around in circles we can just agree to disagree then. You think that it's a different situation for Sony, where as I think think that it's the same thing. You're entitled to your opinion and i'm entitled to mine.



    on 19 April 2017

    Now that's perfectly fine.

    Disagreeing is normal, we are different as well, we see things in different ways, indeed, I have no problem with that.

    You may still think what I said for Nintendo applies perfectly to Sony, that's how you see it, but I wasn't being hypocritical or biased on it because I think both would have different effects as different companies with different business models and different strengths and weaknesses, I hope I have get you to realize that so next time we disagree, which will surely happen, you can reply me back like this, instead of labelling me as biased and when I politely reply you back you start "laughing your ass off" out of the blue and accusating me of moving goalposts, that was the problem here, not disagreeing, which is as I said, perfectly fine.

    on 19 April 2017

    I only said it looked like you were being biased/hypocritical and moving goalposts simply because that's what it looked like to me. You say that you think the situations would be different since both companies work differently, but the 4 reasons you specifically provided in your Nintendo thread apply the same way to Sony (such as wider audience reach, etc), and that is why I said it was hypocritical. I'm not talking about how each company may be organized or whatever(such as how you say you think that Sony wouldn't benefit from it as much as Nintendo, but it does still apply to Sony), i'm just talking specifically about the 4 points you originally mentioned, which apply to all companies. You've said that you see it as a different situation, where as I don't, so we just agree to disagree then.

    on 19 April 2017

    I never said they don't exist to Sony, but the outcome would not the nearly the same.
    Answering Anfebious thread about how it would be good for Sony, I disagreed, because the outcome is different, not that his points (which where my points to Nintendo) where invalid, non-existent or non-reasons, but that the outcome, which again what was the result of those, don't work the same for Sony as a company.
    That's why I told you to try to understand it, you quoted my post to talk about something that was never being disputed, and also why I told you to read what I told back to Rol.

    Apparently we are not even in disagreement (which doesn't mean we are in agreement), we are just in different topics.

    on 19 April 2017

    Ah ok, I see.

    on 19 April 2017

    < FloatingWaffles updated his status:

    I almost preordered a Nintendo Switch the other day. Almost.

    < AngryLittleAlchemist posted something on FloatingWaffles's wall:

    thanks for the request wassup

    What uuuuuuuup.

    on 08 February 2017

    How you doing my boy?

    on 08 February 2017

    Pretty good, what about you?

    on 11 February 2017

    Pretty bad lol. Glad to know you're having a good day tho :)

    on 11 February 2017

    < greencactaur posted something on FloatingWaffles's wall:

    Yes sir, it is a pikashoe :D. Do you like it?

    Lol yeah, it's pretty good. Didn't realize it was supposed to be a shoe until you pointed it out though, I thought you just drew it that way as a design choice lol. I see it now though. :p

    on 02 February 2017

    < Boutros posted something on FloatingWaffles's wall:

    Hey thanks for the add!

    Bit of a late response but you're welcome, thanks for accepting it lol.

    on 08 February 2017

    < FloatingWaffles updated his status:

    I barely use the status update thing. For the past few months i've just had a Spongebob quote in it.

    < hershel_layton posted something on FloatingWaffles's wall:

    You know the character on your profile picture is named Sandals? Scrolling through a thread and felt the need to say that.

    I had no idea what his name was lol. I just remembered him as the fish that says "Great what do I win?" then getting thrown out by Mr. Krabs when he gets his one millionth dollar. Apparently he's the same guy that was making out with his pillow in the episode that had Makeout Reef, according to the wiki page from Spongebob lol.

    on 11 September 2016

    Spongebob did have funny secondary characters. The one-liners always killed me. Too bad spongebob turned to trash after '07

    on 11 September 2016

    More like 05-06. Shame, I also had a spongebob avatar with Patrick's "I love you" scene. Was probably the best avatar I ever had

    on 19 December 2016

    < TomaTito posted something on FloatingWaffles's wall:

    Accepted! It's best to keep people with good sense of humour around :)

    Thanks for accepting it! :)

    on 16 February 2016

    < Wright posted something on FloatingWaffles's wall:

    Thanks for the Friend Request!

    No problem. Thanks for accepting it. :)

    on 19 January 2016

    < fireburn95 posted something on FloatingWaffles's wall:

    Why the f are you buying into this I bash xbox agenda. Show me one, just one, anti-xbox comment on an xbox page. Go on, and screw you if you still believe it.
    Here
    On TR, was the post that started the whole argument me bashing?
    "Europe is usually more open to buying 'non shooters' than usa. I know technically this is a shooter but ya know what i mean"
    No, sounds like a fair reasonable point of view for one to have.

    Was the attack reasonable?
    "@fireburn - A lot of games not shooters do better in the US than Europe. You're just spewing crap as usual.

    Shootere are also popular in Europe but people pretend shooters are just popular in the US for some reason."
    I don't think so, so once again please go ahead and find actual anti xbox posts as you've claimed on multiple boards. Actually let me help you..

    http://www.vgchartz.com/game/85598/fallout-4/Comments/
    My first comment, was that anti-xbox?Puggsly once again came in and brought PS4 into the conversation when I didn't and 'flamed'

    http://www.vgchartz.com/game/85358/call-of-duty-black-ops-3/Comments/
    Was my opening comment here negative? Nope.

    http://www.vgchartz.com/game/85614/fifa-16/Comments/
    Was my opinion here negative or just a point of view? Nope, and look at the saint who comes and trolls once again.

    And literally that is the only pages of 2015 xbox games I found that I commented on. So, either prove me wrong or apologise for your blatant lie and practically getting me banned!

    I didn't "practically get you banned". Re-read your ban message. A mod banned you for insulting Mr. Puggsly. Did someone force you to insult him? No you did that yourself. You decided to call him an asshole in the conversation.

    I came in defense of Mr. Puggsly because I thought it was a bit hypocritical of you to try and call him an xbox fanboy when I see you most on Xbox comment sections.

    If we're talking just 2015 alone here are some others I found you in:

    http://www.vgchartz.com/game/71481/the-witcher-3-wild-hunt/

    http://www.vgchartz.com/game/73075/metal-gear-solid-v-the-phantom-pain/Comments/

    http://www.vgchartz.com/game/85504/assassins-creed-syndicate/Comments/

    Also, I never said you had an anti Xbox agenda. I simply stated that you since you're seen a lot on Xbox comment sections it would make it seem more like either you're the Xbox fanboy rather than Mr. Puggsly or you have something against it, or neither.

    Take for example if you saw me on any Nintendo comment section on this site. After a while of seeing me on there you would probably assume that, depending on whether my comments are negative or positive, that I was either a huge Nintendo fanboy or I had a bias against Nintendo or some sort like that.

    Which is why, like I said in my comment, it sounds hypocritical for you to call Mr. Puggsly the Xbox fanboy when from someone else's POV you would look like it instead. I'm not saying you are, but just think of how it looks on you from someone else's point of view simply.

    on 24 December 2015

    ", it seems as though you are targeting Xbox the most, and most of your comments seem to be negative."
    Are my negative things the facts or opinions I share? I have as much right as anyone to share my opinion or point out a fact.

    Nice finds, Let's see;
    Witcher, I expressed bad sales results for a sku that was bundled and marketed, and had a disproportionate ratio to it's competitive console. That's not negativitiy, it's discussion, this is a sales forum after all, not everyone is here to lick asses.

    MGS - Pointed out the double standards of saying 'Game A sells better because of previous console affiliations but the same situation does not apply to game B'
    Again, not negative, it's discussion. Then I said it won't get to a million in a response... It wont, i'm not here to lick asses.

    on 24 December 2015

    And AC, what's negative about saying
    ''Normally I'd say this was bad but they did launch a week before halo, they should really get out of October and into summer release now''

    It was bad, it was 257k W1, and I gave my opinion as to why. Again, where's the negativity... Shows how bad a liar you are. You saw puggsly make an accusation and practically copied that mentality.
    You found three pages where I posted, I still don't see the 'and for the most part post negative things ' as you say...

    on 24 December 2015

    You're calling me a liar yet the three comment sections I posted with you in them I never said were negative or meant to represent you being negative in any way. I just meant in general showing how you are in fact in a lot of Xbox comment sections. You're desperately trying to look for a reason to call me a liar when I didn't lie about anything.

    I said it SEEMED like most of your comments were negative, not that they ARE mostly negative. Which isn't a lie either, because while some of your comments might not be intended to be negative some of them do come off as negative such as your Wither 3 comments and some of yours made in the Rise of the Tomb Raider section. Do you expect me to go through and find each and every single comment on any single section you've ever made involving Xbox One? No, because just off those 2 alone and the fact that I see you in so many Xbox-related comment sections it's easy to assume, hence the POV that I was talking about earlier from other people and why I said seemed, as in from my point of view, instead of are.

    Let's say you only ever saw 5 comments out of 9 from me on this site, and all of them were negative something about Sony or Nintendo. You would probably say that most of my comments seem negative towards them. It is the same thing.

    I didn't lie about anything.

    on 24 December 2015

    We could keep going on back and forth about this but in the end I had nothing to do with you getting banned. All my comments said was that it was sort of hypocritical from someone else's POV for you to call Mr. Puggsly an Xbox fanboy and that from the "COMMENTS THAT I'VE SEEN YOU MAKE" most of them seemed negative.

    on 24 December 2015

    And yet you can't find one of these so called negative comments where I am targeting xbox. As you wish, this will be my last comment, you refuse to aplogogise and that is your choice, but you lied, or severely took the word of another user as truth thus making you buy into/believe a lie and accuse me of doing something I haven't done.
    You can't find the 'bias against xbox' as your second comment said, It's a bias to discuss bad sales which just so happen to be on xbox platforms? You lied about me being the 'single most seen person in xbox walls' which is obviously wrong as it is puggsly, hell, I didn't even comment on Halo sales, which are probably worthy of discussion moreso than anything. And targetting xbox? Lol are you a child or something, so if I comment about a bunch of wii u games am I targeting wii u/nintendo lol? Grow up.
    "it seems as though you are targeting Xbox the most"
    And if I was targeting xbox as childishly as you put it, would I have praised fallouts xbox sales? I'm guessing not, so once again grow up.

    I called puggsly an extreme xbox fanboy, since that seems to be the only point you can milk up. One that goes out of his way to deceive, such as rating the psx conference 2/5 even though he stated he didn't watch it, and how he declares any good PS sales as because of bundles, and low xbox sales being 'good', not even willing to accept that their is a conversation to be had, and would rather others didn't have it, as evidenced by stalking every comment I make with replies.

    on 24 December 2015

    I didn't lie about anything but i'm sure no matter how many times I say that you'll still keep trying to say it so whatever. Believe what you want to believe.

    If it makes you feel any better I will agree in some sort that I think some of my comments were made a little too quickly and not thought through enough. After thinking about it more now I can see that your comments, for the most part, all seem actually sort of fine. But like I said, I still didn't lie, as I said it SEEMED most of them were negative BASED on the ones that I saw from you that did come off as negative, which is a reasonable thing to assume when I see you so often around Xbox related comment sections. Once again, this is not lying, but i'm sure you will still try to say it is. This also isn't me "buying into a lie" from someone else as you say. I made a reasonable assumption based on the factors, which is normal. It happened to be wrong.

    Also it's ironic you telling me to grow up when the first thing you do after getting banned for insulting Mr. Puggsly is go to my profile and immediately start more shit about this subject.. Were you waiting on this during that whole few days?

    on 24 December 2015

    < FloatingWaffles updated his status:

    Great! What do I win?

    You get nothing!

    on 06 December 2015

    < FloatingWaffles updated his status:

    Nothing really.

    < 1 - 20 of 25 <

    Currently Playing

    Started on 26 February 2019

    Started on 08 April 2016

    Game Stats

    • 6 total number of games
    • 0 games in common
    • 10.0 average game rating
    • PC favourite console (3 games)
    • Shooter favourite genre (3 games)
    • 50% of games completed