zexen_lowe said:
SciFiBoy said:
darthdevidem01 said: REVENGE OF THE SITH!!!!! (the only amazing prequel)!
________
& ROFL ROFL ROFL @ peopel bashing star wars prequels massively
for our generation they are GREAT films!
Star Wars RULES
there won't ever be & never was before it a phenomenon like it! |
im 21 and I can safely say that the new trilogy is nothing compared to the original films
|
So what, who are to say what we can or cannot like? I don't like you saying I'm "kidding"
|
I'm sorry, but a bad movie is a bad movie. That doesn't mean you can't like them, but episodes I-III just aren't good. The *only* reason those are even remembered is because episodes IV-VI are so good. If Episode I-III were released today or in 1980 and you asked someone what Star Wars was, they probably would have no clue what you're talking about. They would be those obscure movies that movie geeks fantasize about and gush over because they know about it and you don't.
The Phantom Menace is just awful and luckily I think they realized how awful that movie was and episodes II and III were at least better, but that really isn't saying much.
Revenge of the Sith was just a bunch of crap happening at once and a giganticly long fight scene that ended in the dumbest way possible with a couple of horrible references to marquee characters from IV-VI (Chewy, really?). Oh, and Padme dying of a broken heart.
Again, if released today, those movies would be remembered about as well as The Peacemaker.
Of course, at least episodes I-III aren't nearly as bad as the terrible idea of making Greedo shoot first and the blasphemous ending of Return of the Jedi.