I spent about 3 hours on the final Labyrinth fight on Chaos! ^^ Is that a new record!?!? Hahahahaha! It felt good when I did it though, but damn, the game was so unfair at times! And the Cestus targeting is still sucky! But the weapon is soooooooooooooooooo cooooool! Love the game, bad targeting or not (L) GOW3 (L)

^yeah I know, but even when they praise it, they complain about it being "too familiar", and other reviews (those who score it less than 9) make it very clear is one of the LOW points of the game, and it's definitely one of their points to knock down the score. Why? it's quite rare to see a sequel where gameplay and style is very different from the previous game. Even MGS4 isn't that different from the 3rd, Uncharted 2 is basically the same as the first one, same thing happens with all GTA games, those games got VERY high scores (I'm not complaining about Gow3 clritical reception) and I don't remember among all those 100s and high 90s (less the rare 80s) complaining because it was "the same".

It's because reviewers are hypocrites.

I have a question though. The first trailer we saw of GOW3, why isn't that in the game. That scene looked soo epic. Oh, and I just spent 5 or 6 hours fighting the Ceberus on Chaos, hehe. I always hated those enemies and that battle was horrible...

Added autoplaying main theme to the first page of the thread !

Whos awesome ?

Don't generalise like that. Just because IGN, GameSpot and Edge can't review to save their lives, doesn't mean that we all suck.

Fuck these reviewers...
Metascore dropped to 92... I don't understand how a perfect game can score 92...

Am I the only one who kept beating Zeus for 5 minutes by the end of the game?? I only stopped due to muscle twitches

oh and for these annoying ass goats, I usually use Hades' claw to summon gorgon soul or just cheap them with the whip's triangle spamming.

1) No game is perfect.

2) 92 is a fantastic score.

3) Why, exactly, do you care what they think?