no, I like motion control (use it on my Wii, which I play as well as my 360/PS3), I'm looking forward to trying out both Natal and PS Wand, one thing I do think though, is that there should be classic control games for around in the future too, I love PS3/360 controls and I think they work really well with alot of games, I think there is no reason why the industry can't both innovate on controls and by making old control games more and more awesome.

See, now I forgot what I was going to post.  Oh well, at least I got to watch some Scrubs.

I've always liked the thought of motion controls.  And I own both a PS3 and 360 - as well as a Wii.

Although, I can tell you, yea... a lot of people are changing their tune because a console they own is getting motion controls.  That changes everything when you have access to it.  You only bash that, which you don't have.

Isn't the Wii powerful enough for a SD console?

Well, the PSMotion does look like a dildo, but.......

Boom blox would be about 1/10th as fun with a controller.  I suggest you try the marble series of games or super monkey ball or mercury meltdown revolution, then play the latter 2 on a console with dual analog.  Or EA grand slam tennis for wii then play an EA tennis title on another system.  There are times when motion controls make a game that otherwise would have lived in the bargain bin.

IR pointing also makes games.  I have all 3 consoles and a gaming pc and like wiimote aiming best (mouse is more accurate but I love rail shooters so I enjoy wiimote more).  I skipped metroid prime because of dual analog.  I LOVE it on wii.  Guess what I'm playing now despite just buying tekken 6?

What you're essentially claiming is that DDR on a pad is no different or more enjoyable than DDR on a controller.  It's so hysterically wrong that I don't understand how you could say it.

Your suggestion is in vein. I have zero interest for games like that. Including DDR and guitar hero like games. I don't see how a bad game comes better with motion controls. It is still the same game. A better argument would have been PGA 10, which is pretty good with motion plus. Not that it hold my interest for more than hour or so.

IR pointer is not the same as motion controls and it is good in some games. I still prefer mouse and in some cases dual analog. Guess who is not going to bother with rail shooters?

Naturally I have no objections if motion controls add to gameplay for you, it just does not do the same for me. I mean, I am not interested in a game where you push buttons with some rhythm. Does not matter if it is done by a keyboard, control pad, plastic guitar or a dancemat.

I know it's not 100% on point but I'd like to say without sixaxis, flOwer would have sucked.

I gotta laugh at people who actually believe that motion controls on 360 and PS3 are somehow going to be used better than motion controls on Wii, despite Wii being completely centered around motion controls, and the HD consoles just using them as an afterthought. I mean we don't even know any games that are going to utilize Natal yet, and as for the PS3 wand, there have only been a few crappy games announced yet. MS and Sony aren't taking motion controls seriously, and so I really doubt they're motion control systems are going to be near the Wii's in quality.

To be fair, the Wii was aimed at the casual audience, Hardcore PS3 360 gamers saw the whole console as a gimmic, the Sony/MS motion controls are aimed at the casual end of Hardcore.

E.G. We have Resident Evil coming out for Sony's motion controller, when the Wii launched, you had those little cartoon dudes to play tennis with.

I think this is more about presentation than people simply having a bias (though I am sure most people do have a bias, myself included)