Soriku said:
|
O_o
Yet over a million bought the Final Fantasy III remake on DS. And it was a crappy remake!
Soriku said:
|
O_o
Yet over a million bought the Final Fantasy III remake on DS. And it was a crappy remake!
Soriku -
You say the Wii hasn't got any major RPGs unlike the DS had RPGs. I think that is wrong. The Wii has had Monster Hunter 3 which sold very well. I don't see how a system can have the #1 console RPG so far (obviously this changes in a week or two), yet still not have Tales of Graces sell well. You say that Tales are locked to 200-300k, but Vesperia proved that to be very wrong.
As for you saying that DQX will sell 3m on the Wii - I won't argue that it will sell near that. My issue is the fact that on the DS, it would have sold about an extra million copies, so I believe it is a bad business move. I'm not talking about fanboy 'I wish game X was on my console of choice' but the actual business decision of it.
@Khuurta - it is a rhetorical question for those arguing that Tales of Graces either did good, or want to argue why it sold poorly. It seems that some want to have it both ways - MH3 can do good because the Wii sells RPGs, but Tales of Graces does bad because it doesn't have the user base that DQX will bring in - so I am asking them to think about the moving goal posts we're seeming to have here.
Back from the dead, I'm afraid.
What does TOG has to do with FFXIII?
This game was the game you have been hyping for months when it came to big games coming to the Wii,and frankly thank God for NSMB Wii because every other game you guys used to list have really not done their job at all.
Next Gen
| 11/20/09 04:25 | makingmusic476 | Warning | Other (Your avatar is borderline NSFW. Please keep it for as long as possible.) |
According to Famitsu, Abyss had one of the most front-loaded openings, Soriku. 66% of its entire run was on its first week :-p
I thought Dawn of the New World was a very good Tales game, Soriku? Also, how are you defining bad stigma? Because they are on the same console, or any other thing? Isn't arguing DOTNW's stigma affecting Graces like arguing Crystal Bearers will hurt FFXIII?
Back from the dead, I'm afraid.
| mrstickball said: @Khuurta - it is a rhetorical question for those arguing that Tales of Graces either did good, or want to argue why it sold poorly. It seems that some want to have it both ways - MH3 can do good because the Wii sells RPGs, but Tales of Graces does bad because it doesn't have the user base that DQX will bring in - so I am asking them to think about the moving goal posts we're seeming to have here. |
Well let's you and me cut through the bullshit here and get down to the hanky-spanky.
Monster Hunter 3 did very well for an RPG (or any third-party console game) in Japan this generatioin because Monster Hunter fans - the real ones - will follow it regardless of where it goes and assuming they can get past the whole "I have to subscribe to an online service!?" thing. Monster Hunter is enormous, but it's not the kind of game that will draw RPG-playing crowds for other RPGs. It doesn't appeal to the same userbase.
Tales isn't lik that either but Tales is further hampered by the fact that 1. Tales titles are relatively flooding the market and 2. Tales's appeal is at an all-time low. Players just don't want it that damn badly!
Wii does not have an RPG-buying crowd right now because it does not have the library that draws RPG buyers. The DS and (to a much lesser extent, minding the nature of Monster Hunter) the PSP do, but none of the consoles do right now.
The reason people bring up Dragon Quest as a game changer is because Dragon Quest is at least thought to be the game that draws all RPG players in Japan. It's not in tthe same class in Monster Hunter, and it's not even on the same planet as Tales. Granted, though, that the Wii is a unique scenario, because Dragon Quest traditionally comes to consoles that have strong RPG-playing bases already, either because developers flock to that console to anticipate the RPG players or because RPG players follow Dragon Quest. One of those is true, but if it's the former then Dragon Quest X very much will not help other RPGs.
I still expect Dragon Quest X to smash every other console RPG in Japan this gen in terms of sales, because Dragon Quest players will buy Dragon Quest. The only question is if they'll buy anything else.
| Khuutra said: Well let's you and me cut through the bullshit here and get down to the hanky-spanky. Monster Hunter 3 did very well for an RPG (or any third-party console game) in Japan this generatioin because Monster Hunter fans - the real ones - will follow it regardless of where it goes and assuming they can get past the whole "I have to subscribe to an online service!?" thing. Monster Hunter is enormous, but it's not the kind of game that will draw RPG-playing crowds for other RPGs. It doesn't appeal to the same userbase. Tales isn't lik that either but Tales is further hampered by the fact that 1. Tales titles are relatively flooding the market and 2. Tales's appeal is at an all-time low. Players just don't want it that damn badly! See, I would disagree about the Tales series being at an all time low. Vesperia sold >500,000 between both iterations which is stronger than virtually every other Tales game this generation (handhelds included). I agree the series is on the decline compared to the PS2, but I don't see mainline console Tales games being the kind that generate only 200-300k in sales, because we don't have that kind of history. Vesperia did indeed do weak on the 360, but the PS3 version showed that there is still a pretty strong userbase because Famitsu has it at 312k and going - if it had the same legs the 360 version had (which had the best legs of any console Tales this decade), it may continue to sell very well. Wii does not have an RPG-buying crowd right now because it does not have the library that draws RPG buyers. The DS and (to a much lesser extent, minding the nature of Monster Hunter) the PSP do, but none of the consoles do right now. See, I would disagree about the RPG buying crowd not having a base anywhere. It certainly does on the PS3 given the strong sales of Vesperia, WKC, Valkyria, and Demon Souls. I would certainly agree its not at the PS2-level, but it certainly attracts casual buyers given the sales history of the aforementioned titles. The reason people bring up Dragon Quest as a game changer is because Dragon Quest is at least thought to be the game that draws all RPG players in Japan. It's not in tthe same class in Monster Hunter, and it's not even on the same planet as Tales. Granted, though, that the Wii is a unique scenario, because Dragon Quest traditionally comes to consoles that have strong RPG-playing bases already, either because developers flock to that console to anticipate the RPG players or because RPG players follow Dragon Quest. One of those is true, but if it's the former then Dragon Quest X very much will not help other RPGs. I still expect Dragon Quest X to smash every other console RPG in Japan this gen in terms of sales, because Dragon Quest players will buy Dragon Quest. The only question is if they'll buy anything else. I certainly agree with this analysis: We cannot guarentee if a title like DQX will help the actual RPG user base on the Wii. Because of that reason (which we both agree on), we must judge each title based on performance metrics of franchise titles, market comparables, and console comparables. Because of those 3 things, I just feel strongly that Tales did worse than expected, regardless of justification. I do not doubt for a second DQX will be a smash hit on the Wii, but at the same time, I believe it would of been such regardless of system - DS, PSP, PS3, X360. |
Back from the dead, I'm afraid.
Well stickball, you also have to keep in mind that Tales users - there are only so many of them, and many of those game on the HD consoles. Demographic problems can be pretty cut and dry.
We agree on DQX.
Soriku said:
|
Famitsu - 312k 10/19/09
VGC - 312k 10/18/09
Seems pretty good to me. We'll have to wait for the top 500 to see if it was overtracked in subsequent weeks.