Forums - General Discussion - Obama approval at 49/46, lowest in December for first-year president

Final-Fan said:
outlawauron said:
supercat said:
Nixon and somebody else. But for obama not to get a 2nd term he'd have to really mess things up.....most get a free ride into a 2nd term.

Bush Sr.

lolwut

Why has no one corrected this before?  Not only did Carter and Ford before him serve single terms after Nixon (and before Bush Sr. obviously), but Nixon was reelected even if he didn't serve his full second term.  AND Nixon's presidency ended well before "3 decades" ago (1979). 

Laziness... I thought someone else would do it... and after a while... eh...

Plus i didn't want to remind someone else of historys greatest monster.

 

 



Around the Network
Final-Fan said:
outlawauron said:
supercat said:
Nixon and somebody else. But for obama not to get a 2nd term he'd have to really mess things up.....most get a free ride into a 2nd term.

Bush Sr.

lolwut

Why has no one corrected this before?  Not only did Carter and Ford before him serve single terms after Nixon (and before Bush Sr. obviously), but Nixon was reelected even if he didn't serve his full second term.  AND Nixon's presidency ended well before "3 decades" ago (1979). 

I just named someone who only served one term recently. Nothing more.



"We'll toss the dice however they fall,
And snuggle the girls be they short or tall,
Then follow young Mat whenever he calls,
To dance with Jak o' the Shadows."

Check out MyAnimeList and my Game Collection. Owner of the 5 millionth post.

outlawauron said:
Final-Fan said:
outlawauron said:
supercat said:
Nixon and somebody else. But for obama not to get a 2nd term he'd have to really mess things up.....most get a free ride into a 2nd term.

Bush Sr.

lolwut

Why has no one corrected this before?  Not only did Carter and Ford before him serve single terms after Nixon (and before Bush Sr. obviously), but Nixon was reelected even if he didn't serve his full second term.  AND Nixon's presidency ended well before "3 decades" ago (1979). 

I just named someone who only served one term recently. Nothing more.

Well, you aren't the person who gave the thrice-wrong answer, as the quote box shows.  But adding "Bush Sr." to that statement without commentary implies endorsement of the answer you added to, making you, technically, wrong by association. 

(i.e. your reply of "Bush Sr." implied that you were clarifying the earlier answer to be "Nixon and Bush Sr.", which would be incorrect.)



Tag (courtesy of fkusumot): "Please feel free -- nay, I encourage you -- to offer rebuttal."
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
My advice to fanboys: Brag about stuff that's true, not about stuff that's false. Predict stuff that's likely, not stuff that's unlikely. You will be happier, and we will be happier.

"Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not his own facts." - Sen. Pat Moynihan
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
The old smileys: ; - ) : - ) : - ( : - P : - D : - # ( c ) ( k ) ( y ) If anyone knows the shortcut for , let me know!
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
I have the most epic death scene ever in VGChartz Mafia.  Thanks WordsofWisdom! 

outlawauron said:
theprof00 said:
*snip*

who's talking about anti-bush?

Why can't this country stop bickering over sides. Let's fucking get our shit together and stop pissing in the pool

Exactly my point. You were saying that all that wasted time and crap was being funded by the right. I said who cares? Both sides are guilty of being stupid and what I said is still the same regardless of the current detractors.

Frankly we need to get rid of the party system. Its worthless and split our country into virtually two sides, with a few smaller collectives, that pretty much aim to destroy one-another over having slightly different views.



PC gaming is better than console gaming. Always.     We are Anonymous, We are Legion    Kick-ass interview   Great Flash Series Here    Anime Ratings     Make and Play Please
Amazing discussion about being wrong
Official VGChartz Folding@Home Team #109453
 

Given the last poll I saw, if there was a 3rd party that was anti-government (Tea Party), they would be larger than the Republicans, and almost as large as the Dems....So there is the ability for it.

Heck, if Perot hadn't backed out of the 92 election for a few months, he would have beaten Clinton.



Back from the dead, I'm afraid.

Around the Network

So long as he can get people back to work, then his approval ratings will go up.



The tea party i though was nothing more then a very small group of people who though power and media make them seem like the majority of the usa though that way. This is the new problem that the small groups can take over the majority due to technology.



Smash ID: Jski - 0559-6620-9873

Add me if you wish but PM me if you do.

Jski - Its more of a frame of mind and political ideology than just a group of people. It is the anti-spending wing of the American people.



Back from the dead, I'm afraid.

I see but what i had said it true they are finding that in California its these small groups that are contorting the reforms that the publican vote on. Its going to be something as the next generation that going to have to be dealt with. Power though technological control. I think this may be happening to a point with these trends but it would be foolish or very scary to think that its comply due to this.



Smash ID: Jski - 0559-6620-9873

Add me if you wish but PM me if you do.