It's such bullshit that the gameplay "needs" HD. What kind of stupid concept is "HD" gaming anyway? PC games have been running so-called HD graphics (or higher) resolution for 10+ years, it was no big deal back then that consoles didn't have it.
I do not know of a single game released this generation that could not have been done on a PS2, Xbox or Gamecube. Of course you can have Assassin's Creed gameplay on a Wii!
The reason that those games are not on Wii is because the developers, like a lot of gamers, are graphics/technology whores. It's must-have, just because it is possible. Doesn't make the game more fun.
Played Street Fighter IV on the 360 the other day, nice graphics. The game could have been done on the SNES. Oh wait, it was, it's called Street Fighter II. Exactly the same game, prettier graphics. Big deal.
The graphics race is not innovative, it is stopping innovation. Look at Resident Evil 4, awesome gameplay, decent graphics (even on the PS2 version). Capcom gets the new generation to play with, what do they add to the game? Better textures on the "zombies"? Cool sunlight effects. Look what's the better game.
Sometimes I wish the Wii had cost $100 more at retail, and had stronger specs. Not because I need better graphics, but because the Wii is missing out on nice games because the developers say that their games HAVE TO have it to work. It's gotta have that "cinematic" feel! You know what, I watch movies AT THE CINEMA, I don't control them with a thumbstick.
<</rant over>
What was this thread about again?