By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Sony - IGN's Ratchet & Clank Future: A Crack in Time Review - 9.0

Kantor on 20 October 2009

0.4 below ToD? Odd, since his only complaints were lack of innovation in the formula (which ToD didn't have either) and "repetitiousness of side missions".

Still, 9/10 is an excellent score.



(Former) Lead Moderator and (Eternal) VGC Detective

Around the Network
monsterone on 20 October 2009

TOD is an awesome game, should only get better from there.



Rainbird on 20 October 2009
Kantor said:
0.4 below ToD? Odd, since his only complaints were lack of innovation in the formula (which ToD didn't have either) and "repetitiousness of side missions".

Still, 9/10 is an excellent score.

I guess it isn't unreasonable to be even more tired of the same old formula now that we have had both ToD and QfB



Kantor on 20 October 2009
Rainbird said:
Kantor said:
0.4 below ToD? Odd, since his only complaints were lack of innovation in the formula (which ToD didn't have either) and "repetitiousness of side missions".

Still, 9/10 is an excellent score.

I guess it isn't unreasonable to be even more tired of the same old formula now that we have had both ToD and QfB

QfB wasn't the same formula at all, it was completely different. It was also, by far, the lowest score IGN has given to a Ratchet game.



(Former) Lead Moderator and (Eternal) VGC Detective

Xen on 20 October 2009

Another good Ratchet, yeah baby!



Around the Network
sabby_e17 on 20 October 2009

Must buy. I hope this gets a 90+ on metacritic.




Rainbird on 20 October 2009
Kantor said:
Rainbird said:
Kantor said:
0.4 below ToD? Odd, since his only complaints were lack of innovation in the formula (which ToD didn't have either) and "repetitiousness of side missions".

Still, 9/10 is an excellent score.

I guess it isn't unreasonable to be even more tired of the same old formula now that we have had both ToD and QfB

QfB wasn't the same formula at all, it was completely different. It was also, by far, the lowest score IGN has given to a Ratchet game.

It was the same formula with stuff removed to accomodate the whole "downloadable" thing. I don't see an issue labelling the same as ToD anyway



nordlead on 20 October 2009
Riot Of The Blood said:
Platformer of the year, baby.

I gotta get this.

last time I checked, ratchet wasn't much of a platformer and NSMBWii was still coming out this year...

I still need to get the first one, but I'm waiting for the price to drop futher on ebay.




If you drop a PS3 right on top of a Wii, it would definitely defeat it. Not so sure about the Xbox360. - mancandy
In the past we played games. In the future we watch games. - Forest-Spirit
11/03/09 Desposit: Mod Bribery (RolStoppable)  vg$ 500.00
06/03/09 Purchase: Moderator Privilege  vg$ -50,000.00

Nordlead Jr. Photo/Video Gallery!!! (Video Added 4/19/10)

Kantor on 20 October 2009
Rainbird said:
Kantor said:
Rainbird said:
Kantor said:
0.4 below ToD? Odd, since his only complaints were lack of innovation in the formula (which ToD didn't have either) and "repetitiousness of side missions".

Still, 9/10 is an excellent score.

I guess it isn't unreasonable to be even more tired of the same old formula now that we have had both ToD and QfB

QfB wasn't the same formula at all, it was completely different. It was also, by far, the lowest score IGN has given to a Ratchet game.

It was the same formula with stuff removed to accomodate the whole "downloadable" thing. I don't see an issue labelling the same as ToD anyway

Quest for Booty was much more platforming focused than your average R&C game, which focuses on gun combat. It was nice to have a short game which tried something new with the franchise, but I prefer the traditional R&C games.



(Former) Lead Moderator and (Eternal) VGC Detective

Barozi on 20 October 2009

fantastic score. Not as high as ToD, but still great