angrypoolman said:
highwaystar101 said:
Here you go check this link http://www.alcoholalert.com/drunk-driving-statistics.html
currently 37% of all driving fatalities are caused directly from drink driving. from 1982 to 2003 that figure went from 60% to 40%, which hopefully shows that drivers are becoming more responsible for their actions.
|
I believe being drunk increases the risk of being in an accident, but I am just concerned that people use it as a scapegoat, and make statements like 'everyone who drives drunk is an idiot.' I think there are circumstances where people who drive over the limit are not a danger, and should be let go.
|
People do not use it as a scapegoat. Do you know how much drink driving reduces your action times alone despite it being such a small amount? It is from 1 to 5 seconds depending on how much you have drank. That's enough to cause a fatal accident. Alcohol impairs you ability to drive, fact. Just like it impares your ability to do anything. Everyone who drives drunk and thinks it is a good idea is an idiot in my view, it's a stupid thing to do and it's a good way to end up dead.
Why do you think the government are so keen to stop drink driving? I know in the UK the government and NHS are constantly running adverts against drink driving, drug driving and driving whilst on the phone, because those situations kill people.
In the USA in 1999 drivers caused 7% of road accidents, BUT caused 38% of the fatalities. What does that does that tell you about driving drunk? It's often not a case of just bumping somebodies car bumper like many crashes where the drivers were sober. It is often the case that driving drunk causes irrational behaviour and impaired ability to drive, which, as a vast amount of evidence shows, is a lethal concoction.