IGN for me. I usually agree with their reviews (at least the written parts) and I rarely get burned by them. Also, they have the Chobot.
IGN was the first gaming site I visited (sega sages) and it's been reliable throughout the years.
IGN
its not they are "Too lazy" , jeez.
its that Gamespot doesn't review a game before getting the final build. IGN reviews the review build, IGN is pretty stupid at times, reviewed by a bunch of idiots, and if their fanbase loves a game, they give it an extra score, if the game is not so popular they just rub it off, if the game is too hard to finish they whine about the difficulty and review it before finishing it.
Gamespot however take good notes on what the game offers and what to keep an eye out, their scores however are not the most generous but thats a good thing since it means they are not biased.
so Gamespot.
| PullusPardus said: its not they are "Too lazy" , jeez. its that Gamespot doesn't review a game before getting the final build. IGN reviews the review build, IGN is pretty stupid at times, reviewed by a bunch of idiots, and if their fanbase loves a game, they give it an extra score, if the game is not so popular they just rub it off, if the game is too hard to finish they whine about the difficulty and review it before finishing it. Gamespot however take good notes on what the game offers and what to keep an eye out, their scores however are not the most generous but thats a good thing since it means they are not biased. so Gamespot. |
Kane&Lynch my friend. Kane & Lynch
| PullusPardus said: its not they are "Too lazy" , jeez. its that Gamespot doesn't review a game before getting the final build. IGN reviews the review build, IGN is pretty stupid at times, reviewed by a bunch of idiots, and if their fanbase loves a game, they give it an extra score, if the game is not so popular they just rub it off, if the game is too hard to finish they whine about the difficulty and review it before finishing it. Gamespot however take good notes on what the game offers and what to keep an eye out, their scores however are not the most generous but thats a good thing since it means they are not biased. so Gamespot. |
Okay. Please explain why:
1) They didn't review Valkyria Chronicles until 3 weeks after release
2) The PS3 review of Dead Space was put up a week after the 360 review, and was IDENTICAL.
3) Similarly, Dragon Ball Burst Limit had no PS3 review until WAY after the 360 review.
I don't know why they do it, but they do it.
(Former) Lead Moderator and (Eternal) VGC Detective 
IGN.
No contest.
Kimi wa ne tashika ni ano toki watashi no soba ni ita
Itsudatte itsudatte itsudatte
Sugu yoko de waratteita
Nakushitemo torimodosu kimi wo
I will never leave you
Kantor said:
Okay. Please explain why: 1) They didn't review Valkyria Chronicles until 3 weeks after release 2) The PS3 review of Dead Space was put up a week after the 360 review, and was IDENTICAL. 3) Similarly, Dragon Ball Burst Limit had no PS3 review until WAY after the 360 review. I don't know why they do it, but they do it. |
1) its an rpg, VC takes long to finish.
2) different team, reviewing on different consoles
3) same as above
dorbin2009 said:
|
don't get me wrong, im not saying they are "perfect" im just saying that they made the better written reviews.
IGN is too biased of what they're fanbase want them to do , and also on the mainstream games.
About Us |
Terms of Use |
Privacy Policy |
Advertise |
Staff |
Contact
Display As Desktop
Display As Mobile
© 2006-2025 VGChartz Ltd. All rights reserved.
Pixel Art can be fun.
