By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
PullusPardus on 30 September 2009
Edit Thread
dorbin2009 said:
PullusPardus said:
its not they are "Too lazy" , jeez.

its that Gamespot doesn't review a game before getting the final build. IGN reviews the review build, IGN is pretty stupid at times, reviewed by a bunch of idiots, and if their fanbase loves a game, they give it an extra score, if the game is not so popular they just rub it off, if the game is too hard to finish they whine about the difficulty and review it before finishing it.

Gamespot however take good notes on what the game offers and what to keep an eye out, their scores however are not the most generous but thats a good thing since it means they are not biased.

so Gamespot.


Kane&Lynch my friend. Kane & Lynch

don't get me wrong, im not saying they are "perfect" im just saying that they made the better written reviews.

IGN is too biased of what they're fanbase want them to do , and also on the mainstream games.