Write yours down!

Ill start with some Anti-PS3 arguments...Cause i hear these more than anything.

Argument 1.)  PS3 Has no Gamezorz!

MY RESPONSE:-- ...Dude...where the hell have you been?

Argument 2.) XBL OWNS PSN!

My Response:-- The only thing XBL has over PSN ATM is integrated cross game Voice Chat, and that is to be added in the next major PSN update.  Its no secret that the Online servers for the PS3 are more stable, anyone who has played CoD4 or W@W on both systems can attest to that...

BUT on many games it is easier to find people to play with due to the large Gap in userbases.  (Civilization Revolution...EndWar for example) That is one advantage the 360 has...larger online userbase (number wise but not % of owners)

AND 360 has more DLC (Fallout anyone) so i guess this argument is two sided, granted all Fallout DLC is coming to PS3 now, but we will never see Ballad of Gay Tony...

add these: "Bluray is useless." & "graphics doesn't matter".

Motion control is better for FPS.

Add this as well: "more sales mean hardware superiority"

"Nintendo is milking their franchises"

Seriously, the intervals between Nintendo game releases is long enough to make the new released games interresting. It's not like madden or CoD or Guitar Hero or anything like that. With every new game, Nintendo adds new ideas. It's not milking it's franchises to death.

"But it has Blu Ray too."

^ Most of those arguments still work. Except for the PS3 has no games.

Sorry, but I don't think you understand the idea of this thread.  He's asking for things that aren't true.

OT:

"Only soccer moms and old people buy Wiis."

"Wii has no core games."

"Wii owners don't buy games."

"Wii owners don't buy core games."

"Wii owners don't buy core games not made by Nintendo."

"Sega does what Nintendon't!"

PS3 is domed

Teh C3LL is harder to develop for.

Sadly as true today as it was 2 years ago. Despite SONY's protestations.