n00b said:
Nah, I'd say I'm looking at it from a larger perspective -- some of us have seen this all before, with Nintendo cultists making the same grand pronouncements before. I'd say the people not using any perspective are the ones who have no sense of history whatsoever, yet think they can judge anything based on the first 4 months of a console's life.
Some Wii fanboy writes an article the week before launch saying that it's all over, and people lap that up. It's absolutely hilarious.
I suggest you go read the bulk of Sean Malstrom's articles before you say he or I or John Lucas has a myopic view of things. He looks all the way back to the birth of home consoles in the early 70s, not just the last two generations.
Personally, I think its pretty short-sighted to say "Nintendo lost the last two generations. They'll lose this one too," when there's nearly a quarter century of home console sales and trends to look at before the N64... And long story short, those trends suggest that Wii is following in the footsteps of Pong, Atari 2600 and NES...
Thats not to say there aren't plenty of Nintendo fanboys who are gloating over early Wii sales, and then turning around and saying something idiotic like "Manhunt 2 is one of the most important upcoming games on Wii." But if you think thats me or John Lucas or Sean Malstrom, you're mistaken.
"[Our former customers] are unable to find software which they WANT to play."
"The way to solve this problem lies in how to communicate what kind of games [they CAN play]."
Satoru Iwata, Nintendo President. Only slightly paraphrased.